240 likes | 534 Views
Introduction. Zachary G. Ives University of Pennsylvania CIS 650 – Implementing Data Management Systems September 4, 2008. Welcome to CIS 650, Database and Information Systems!. Instructor: Zachary Ives, zives@cis 576 Levine Hall North Office hours: Wednesdays, 2PM
E N D
Introduction Zachary G. Ives University of Pennsylvania CIS 650 – Implementing Data Management Systems September 4, 2008
Welcome to CIS 650, Database and Information Systems! Instructor: Zachary Ives, zives@cis • 576 Levine Hall North • Office hours: Wednesdays, 2PM Home page: www.cis.upenn.edu/~zives/cis650/ Discussion group: cis650-fall08@googlegroups.com Texts and readings: • Hellerstein & Stonebraker: Readings in Database Systems, 4th ed. • Most papers will be linked via the Web, but it’s often nice to have the book • Supplementary papers (will be linked via schedule)
Course Format and Prerequisites • Read “classic” and important research papers • Lectures will be very discussion-oriented; about one topic area per week or two • Gain experience building some sort of data management “engine” and experimentally validating it – this is a systems course • At end: you should be equipped to do research in this field, or apply ideas from data management to your field • Prerequisites: • Strong undergraduate DB course, or CIS 550 • SQL, data modeling, basics of query optimization and execution, ACID, … • Strong Java coding abilities
Grading Summaries/commentary on papers (20%) “Midterm report” (25%) • Take one of the topics we’ve discussed and write a summary and synthesis paper • Graded for organization, clarity, grammar, etc. as well as content Project (50%) – team or individual: • One focus: a SIGMOD demo to build a “smart research environment” – instrumented machines, labs, building (more shortly) • Implementation • Experimentation / validation • Project report (should be in the style of a research paper) • Brief (~15-minute) presentation for each group / project Participation, discussion, intangibles (5%)
Potential Projects • “Smart CIS”: integrate data from sensors, machines, power monitoring, calendars, etc. to build a queriable building, labs, machines • Goal: demo at SIGMOD, possibly some research papers! • Cloud computing: adapt a query processor to run on Hadoop • Sensors: build a real app with Crossbow motes • Data visualizer: help understand and manipulate data • Transformation reverse engineering: create data instances to determine what a Perl or other tool is doing when converting from one format to another
So What Is This Course About? Not how to build an Oracle-driven Web site… … nor even how to build Oracle…
What Is Unique about Data Management? • It’s been said that databases and data management focus on scalability to huge volumes of data • What is it that makes this possible – and what makes the work interesting if NOT at huge scale?
The Key Principle: Data Independence • Most methods of programming don’t separate the logical and physical representations of data • The data structures, access methods, etc. are all given via interfaces! • The relational data model was the first model for data that is independent of its data structures and implementation
What Is Data Independence? • Codd points out that previous methods had: • Order dependence • Index dependence • Access path dependence • Still true in today’s Java/C#: what is the drawback? • What might you be able to do in removing those?
The Relational Data Model More than just tables! • True relations: sets of tuples • The only data representation a user/programmer “sees” • Explicit encoding of everything in values General and universal means of encoding everything! • Connections are explicitly represented as values • All semantics are pushed to queries Additional integrity constraints • Key constraints, functional dependencies, … A secondary concept: views • Define derived relations that are always “live” • A way of encapsulating, abstracting, protecting, integrating data
Constraints and Normalization • Fundamental idea: we don’t want to build semantics into the data model, but we want to be able to encode certain constraints • Functional dependencies, key constraints, foreign-key constraints, multivalued dependencies, join dependencies, etc. • Allows limited data validation, plus opportunities for optimization • The theory of normalization (see CSE 330, CIS 550) makes use of known constraints • Idea: eliminate redundancy, in order to maintain consistency in the presence of updates • (Note that there’s no reason for normalization of data in views!) • Ergo, XML???
Relational Completeness(Plus Extensions): Declarativity What is special about relational query languages that makes them amenable to scalability? • Limited expressiveness – particularly when we consider conjunctive queries (even with recursion) • Guaranteed polytime execution in size of data • Can reason about containment, invert them, etc. • Equivalence between relational calculus and algebra • Calculus fully declarative, basis of query languages • Algebra imperative but polytime, basis of runtime systems • Predictability of operations (in bulk) cost models • Ability to supplement data with auxiliary structures for performance • Interfaces to other “external” languages
Concurrency and Consistency • Traditionally, DB efforts provide “ACID” properties: • Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability • Transaction : an atomic sequence of database actions (read/write) on data items (e.g. calendar entry) • Recoverability via a log: keeping track of all actions carried out by the database • But there’s a cost to all of this! • How do distributed systems, Web services, service-oriented architectures, and the like affect these properties? • We’ll consider one “relaxation” of these properties – the MapReduce / BigTable style of computing
Other Data Models • Concepts from the relational data model have been adapted to form object-oriented data models (with classes and subclasses), XML models, etc. • Doesn’t this result in some loss of logical-physical independence?
What Is a Data Management System? • Of course, there are traditional databases • The focus of most work in the past 25 years • “Tight loops” due to locally controlled data • Indexing, transactions, concurrency, recovery, optimization • Also, today there are DB-like components in: • Your email client and server (transactional storage) • Enterprise Java Beans (distributed transactions) • Google Base, BigTable, … (distributed indexing, storage) • But…
80% of the World’s Data is Not in Databases! Examples: • Scientific data (large images, complex programs that analyze the data) • Personal data • WWW and email • Network traffic logs • Sensor data, network router data, stream data, … • Are there benefits to declarative techniques and data independence in tackling these issues? • Need to deal with data we don’t control and can’t guarantee consistency over • In recent years: increasing connection between databases, data integration, information retrieval, information extraction, sensors…
Some Questions We’ll Consider • What are the “right” architectures for data sharing? How do they change as consistency needs (or other requirements) change? • How much can we abstract away heterogeneity, physical properties, etc.? • How do we get good performance from declarative queries?
Some Classes of Systems We’ll Consider Databases How do we optimize and execute queries or ensure ACID? Data integration How do we handle heterogeneity in data and meaning? Data streams and sensor data How do we process infinite amounts of data? Cloud computing, Web search How do we partition computation along 1000s of machines and achieve reliable execution? Peer-to-peer architectures What’s the best way of finding data?
Our Agenda this Semester • Reading the canonical papers in the data management literature, starting with databases and later going to other data management systems • Some are very systems-y • Some are very experimental • Some are highly algorithmic, complexity-oriented • Gaining an understanding of the principles of building systems to handle declarative queries over large volumes of data
Recap: Query Answering in a Data Management System • Based on declarative query languages • Based on restricted first-order logic expressions over relations • Not procedural – defines constraints on the output • Converted into a query plan that exploits properties; run over the data by the query optimizer and query execution engine • Data may be local or remote • Data may be heterogeneous or homogeneous • Data sources may have different interfaces, access methods, etc. • Most common query languages: • SQL (based on tuple relational calculus) • Datalog (based on domain relational calculus, plus fixpoint) • XQuery (functional language; has an XML calculus core)
Recap: Layers of a Typical Data Management System API/GUI (Simplification!) Query Optimizer Stats Physical plan Exec. Engine Logging, recovery Schemas Catalog Data/etc Requests Access Methods Data/etc Requests Buffer Mgr Red = logical Blue = physical Pages Pages Physical retrieval Data Requests Source
Hash STUDENT Merge COURSE Takes by cid by cid Processing the Query Web Server / UI / etc Execution Engine Optimizer Storage Subsystem SELECT * FROM STUDENT, Takes, COURSE WHERE STUDENT.sid = Takes.sID AND Takes.cID = cid
DBMSs in the Real World • Big, mature relational databases • IBM, Oracle, Microsoft • “Middleware” above these • SAP, PeopleSoft, dozens of special-purpose apps • “Application servers” • Integration and warehousing systems • DB2 Integrator, Oracle Fusion, … • Current trends: • Web services; XML everywhere • Smarter, self-tuning systems (AutoAdmin, …) • Stream systems (Vertica, Microsoft, IBM)
For Next Time • Skim Codd if you haven’t already • Read the overview papers of the two first database systems: • Astrahan et al., pp. 117- • Wong et al. (skip Section 2; focus on pp. 200-) • Write a summary of your assigned paper and post to the Google Group: cis650-fall08@googlegroups.com • Key question: how well did this system mesh with Codd’s relational model? (You may need to skim through other aspects of your assigned paper to help answer that question)