540 likes | 900 Views
Laurie M. Ryan, PhDAssistant Director for Research, Neuropsychologist Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center Walter Reed Army Medical CenterAssistant Professor of Neurology Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. Learning Objectives: After viewing this presentation the participant will be able to:.
E N D
1. Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Challenges in 21st Century Warfare
3. Learning Objectives:After viewing this presentation the participant will be able to: Describe the work of DVBIC
Discuss concussions/TBI that occur in theater especially those resulting from blasts
List the effects of TBI
Make appropriate referrals to the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC)
4. Session Overview Background on Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC)
Recent work with blast injury
Patient interview video
Referral to DVBIC
5. DVBIC Headquarters: Walter Reed Army Medical Center
6. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
7. The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) Originally the Defense and Veterans Head Injury Program (DVHIP)
Congressionally directed program (f. 1991)
Clinical Care
Clinical Research
Education
For the Active Duty Soldier
Military Beneficiary, and Veteran
8. Head Injury Initiative “This funding will be for [DoD to take the lead] in tracking and evaluating head injury survivors, ensuring that the survivor is getting appropriate treatment, studying the outcome of the treatment, and for counseling family members of the survivor.”
9. Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center Components
3 Military Treatment Facilities (Tertiary Care); HQ
4 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers - geographically dispersed across continental US
1 Community Reentry – newly added civilian site to augment existing resources within the military and veterans health care systems
10. DVBIC Sites Walter Reed Army Medical Center- HQ
San Diego Naval Medical Center
Wilford Hall Air Force Medical Center
Minneapolis VA Medical Center
Tampa VA Medical Center
Richmond VA Medical Center
Palo Alto VA Health Care System
Virginia NeuroCare, Inc.
11. The Past Decade 1992 - “Large Randomized Trials can’t be done in rehabilitation”
2000 – JAMA publication of WRAMC Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Cognitive Therapy for moderate-severe TBI
12. Cognitive RehabilitationFor Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Trial AM Salazar, MD; DL Warden, MD; K Schwab, PhD;
J Spector, PhD; S Braverman, MD; J Walter, PA; R Cole, MD; MM Rosner, MA; EM Martin, RNC; J Ecklund, MD,
RG Ellenbogen, MD
for the
Defense & Veterans Head Injury Program (DVHIP) study group
JAMA. 2000; 283:3075-3081
13. The Efficacy of TBI Cognitive RehabilitationA Prospective, Controlled Randomized Trial Hypotheses
In Moderate to Severe TBI Patients:
1) An institutional cognitive rehabilitation program will result in greater return to work/duty rates than a limited home program.
2) Institutional cognitive rehabilitation will result in better behavioral / cognitive recovery and quality of life than a limited home program
14. TBI Cognitive RehabilitationA Prospective Randomized Trial Methods: Patients
(N=120)
1) Closed head injury: (GCS) =12, OR PTA = 24 hours, OR focal CT/MRI.
2) = 3 months from injury
3) Rancho level 7 (oriented, appropriate)
4) No Hx prior severe TBI or any other severe
disability.
5) Active duty military member, not awaiting
medical separation.
6) Volunteer informed consent signed.
7) Available home if randomized to home program
15. TBI Cognitive RehabilitationA Prospective Randomized Trial Methods: Treatments
Group I: Hospital Program (8 Weeks) (N = 67)
Housing on minimal care ward
Cognitive, Coping Skills, Speech, & Milieu Therapy in AM
Structured Job Placement in afternoon
Group II: Home Program (8 Weeks) (N = 53)
Educational literature and home cognitive exercises ad lib
Weekly, 30-minute telephone call from psychiatric nurse
Both Groups
Evaluation, education & counseling in hospital (approx. 5 days)
Trial of return to limited military duty, follow-up at 6, 12, 24 mos.
16. TBI Cognitive RehabilitationA Prospective Randomized Trial
Treatment Group Characteristics
Home Hospital
Number 53 67_________________
Mean age 26 25 NS
Education 45% 39% NS
Mean days post injury 43 41 NS
Traumatic LOC = 1 hour 76% 53% .01
PTA = 7 days 43% 42% NS
MRI Hematoma / contusion 53% 51% NS
Shear Injury on MR 91% 94% NS
Headaches 57% 58% NS
Violent Behavior 9% 7% NS
Depression 28% 24% NS
17. TBI RehabilitationA Prospective Randomized Trial
Return to Work/Duty One Year Post-Injury
GROUP I GROUP II P value
(Hospital) (Home)
Number 66 53
Return to work 88% 93 % NS
Fitness for duty 73% 66 % NS
18. TBI RehabilitationA Prospective Randomized Trial Quality of Life
One Year Post-Injury
GROUP I GROUP II P value
(Hospital) (Home)
Mean Katz Scores
Belligerence 17.1 19.8 NS
Social Irresponsibility 29.3 29.4 NS
Antisocial Behavior 9.5 11.1 NS
Social Withdrawal 9.8 10.8 NS
Apathy 6.9 8.2 NS
19. TBI RehabilitationA Prospective Randomized Trial Patient Subset Analysis
Percent Fit for Duty by Treatment
Patient Subset N Hospital Home P value
LOC = 1 hr. 75 80% 58% .04
LOC < 1 hr. 40 68% 85% .13
20. TBI RehabilitationA Prospective Randomized Trial Conclusions
1) Results question the value of institutional cognitive rehabilitation for the group of Active Duty moderate - severe TBI survivors with LOC < 1 hour.
2) Results suggest an advantage of institutional cognitive rehabilitation for those with LOC > 1 hour.
3) The potential therapeutic benefits of the home setting need further study.
21. Have we made a difference? 2002 American College of Rehabilitation Medicine and American Association of Neurorehabilitation
Cited WRAMC study as 1 of only 3 studies in the literature linking severity of injury to a specific intervention.
2002 – NIDRR - Model Systems now doing RCTs
2002 – new NIH Clinical Trials Network for TBI at centers with emergency care through rehabilitation
22. Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center How is DVBIC different from NIH and other brain injury research programs?
Focus on those who put themselves in harms way for our country.
Specialized focus on the unique needs of military and veteran beneficiaries- return to duty considerations, continuity of care with military and veterans hospitals and TRICARE
No other program focuses clinical studies on the welfare of Active Duty military, including paratroopers
Clinical Care, Clinical Research, Education
23. TBI Education in Military/VA Prevention: military health fairs; schools
First responders: medics; military trainers -Concussion recognition
Brief clinical evaluation including severity grading
AAN guidelines on return to play/activity and referral for further medical evaluation
Emergency department personnel
Clinical guidelines for imaging
Risk factors for persistent symptoms
Improved patient education material
24. TBI Education in Military/VA Primary care providers
Veterans Health Initiative to identify and treat
Neurobehavioral consequences of TBI
Case managers (direct care; contractor)
Needs of individuals
Available resources; difficulties locating resources, especially in rural areas
Patients/caregivers
Augment available resources
Military/Veteran system specific materials
Increase utilization of Web-based learning
Sport Concussion Study at West Point: refine appropriate instrument for the evaluation of brain function following concussion; and to implement an incollegiate sports concussion protocol at West Point
San Diego teaches TBI assessment to Navy and Marine independent duty corpsmen
Wilford Hall is looking into the possibility of adding TBI evaluation into orientation for Military Training Instructors at Lackand AFB; gateway to the military for all AF enlisted personnelSport Concussion Study at West Point: refine appropriate instrument for the evaluation of brain function following concussion; and to implement an incollegiate sports concussion protocol at West Point
San Diego teaches TBI assessment to Navy and Marine independent duty corpsmen
Wilford Hall is looking into the possibility of adding TBI evaluation into orientation for Military Training Instructors at Lackand AFB; gateway to the military for all AF enlisted personnel
25. Congressional Brain Injury Taskforce October 2003 – Press Conference Capitol Hill
Survivors of TBI –Afghanistan, Iraq, Pentagon
Initial assessment, treatment including education, follow-up care and appropriate interventions
26. DVBIC Research Initiatives Rehabilitation
VA Cognitive Rehab
VA Methylphenidate Study
Genetic Factors of Recovery
TBI Pharmacology Trials
Sertraline for acute Post Concussion Symptoms; Citalopram for Anxiety
Valproate for agitation – Tampa VA
Exelon® for chronic cognitive deficits (sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals)
27. DVBIC Research Initiatives Military Research
Acute concussion evaluation
Telemedicine for remote concussion evaluation
Enhanced helmet design for concussion protection
Brain Injury Registry follow-up
Evaluation and care of Blast Injury survivors
28. Fort Bragg Paratrooper Evaluation Study
30. Lifetime History of TBI
31. Symptom Reporting after Mild TBI These symptoms represent some of the symptoms respondents reported which disturbed them to a moderate or severe degree. All were significantly different for subjects with prior traumatic brain injury compared to subjects without prior brain injury.These symptoms represent some of the symptoms respondents reported which disturbed them to a moderate or severe degree. All were significantly different for subjects with prior traumatic brain injury compared to subjects without prior brain injury.
32. Postconcussion Symptoms (PCS) Headache
Dizziness
Irritability
Decreased Concentration
Memory Problems
Fatigue Visual Disturbances
Sensitivity to Noise
Judgement Problems
Anxiety
Depression
33. USMA Concussion Study
34. Simple Reaction Time
35. Modern Warfare and TBI
36. Brain Injuries in War On Terrorism Bullet wound or penetrating head injury
Dr. Warden will discuss in next session
Blast injuries
result of explosive munitions (e.g., bombs, grenades, land mines, missiles, and mortar/artillery shells)
37. Blast Injuries Multifactorial injury mechanism:
Direct exposure to overpressurization air wave – velocity >/= 300m/sec (speed of sound in air)
Impact from blast energized debris – penetrating and nonpenetrating
Displacement of the person by the blast and impact
Burns/Inhalation of gases
Combination with MVA in war theater
38. Blast Injuries Biological Injury dependent upon:
Peak overpressure
Duration of the positive wave of the overpressure (above atmospheric pressure)
Peak overpressure wave decays rapidly passing thru air
Difficulty predicting forces due to multiple reflections of shock wave, including available venting
39. Blast Injuries Primary blast injury: interaction of the overpressurization wave and the body; differences occurring from one organ to system to another
Air-filled organs such as the ear, lung, and gastrointestinal tract especially susceptible
The brain is also vulnerable: direct injury, e.g. cerebral contusion; indirect injury, e.g. cerebral infarction secondary to air emboli
40. Blast Injuries and Modern Warfare Blast injuries are a common occurrence in modern warfare/conflicts both in civilian disasters (e.g., terrorist actions) and military operations.
Suggested 50% of combat injuries result of explosive munitions (e.g., bombs, grenades, land mines, missiles, and mortar/artillery shells; Coupland & Meddings, 1999).
Brain injury from blasts also common.
41. Blast Injury Induced Brain Injury
42. Blast Injury Induced Brain Injury
43. Observations in bomb blast fatalities in Northern Ireland 1969-77
44. The Beirut Terrorist Bombing 12 tons of TNT equivalent
167/ 234 immediate fatalities demonstrated evidence of head injury
70% fatality rate from head injury
59% rate of head injury
(Higher than previous explosions except Northern Ireland, likely reflects large amount of TNT)
45. The Beirut Terrorist Bombing 112 Marines treated at Battalion Aid Station
86 Marines required further treatment
72 transferred to Iwo Jima nearby
14 referred directly to local Beirut hospital
28 patients with concussion
(25% immediate survivors)
7/28 with post concussion syndrome
2/7 with disability retirements including PCS
13 with skull fracture: all concussion or
scalp laceration
46. Desert Storm Injuries 1991 143 soldiers (140 males) received ballistic injury
17.3% had head wounds; 4.3% had neck wound; 90% had extremity wound; 6% chest; 9% abdomen.
136 (95%) had fragments; 7 (5%) were injured by bullets.
Only 2 had a PBI – both from entry below the Kevlar helmet area frontally.
47. Blast Injuries Seen in Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom High incidence of blast secondary to the use of explosive munitions.
Increasing reports of head injury in soldiers in Iraq (Wagner, 2003).
Blasts
Survivability: Body armor, medical care
48. Recent Blast Injuries Seen at Walter Reed Army Medical Center 155 Patients from combat operations screened for TBI ( e.g., blasts, MVA’s, falls, GSW); most seen between August 2003 and 02 December 2003; 96 of the 155 ( 62%) were identified as having sustained a TBI
88 of the 155 (57%) patients screened were involved in blasts (e.g., Land mine, RPG, IED)
54 (61%) of the 88 blast cases were identified as having sustained a TBI
49. ACRM Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI) Definition A traumatically induced physiological disruption of brain function manifested by at least one of these symptoms:
Loss of consciousness < 30 minutes
Loss of memory for events immediately before (retrograde amnesia) or after the accident (Post Traumatic Amnesia <24 hours)
Any alteration in mental state at the time of the injury (dazed, disoriented, confused)
Presence of focal neurological deficits
If given, GCS score > 13
50. DVBIC TBI Screening/Evaluation Those at risk based on mechanism of injury (blast, vehicle crash, bullet/shrapnel, fall, etc.)
Any LOC, impaired memory for or after the event (ACRM criteria)
Cognitive screening (i.e., RBANS) and/or full neuropsychological evaluation
Neurologic, psychiatric (including PCS), psychosocial, audiologic evaluation; EEG; MRI as clinically indicated
51. Neurocognitive Changes Following TBI
Reduced Information Processing Capacity
Problems with attention/concentration, new learning
Slowed speed of cognitive processing
52. Cognitive Screening Results to Date 52 RBANS Administered
24 out of 52 (46%) patients demonstrated impairment and required full neuropsychological evaluation
22 out of 52 (42%) patients’ results were within expected limits
6 out of 52 (12%) had borderline/equivocal results
53. Patient Education and Follow-up Education:
PCS
Expected Course
Contact Information and Available Resources
Follow-up:
Telephone
Re-evaluation
54. Referral to Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) Formal
Informal
Toll Free Referral and Information Line
1-800-870-9244
DSN 662-6345
Web Site: www.DVBIC.org
EXHIBIT Booth 205