1 / 27

Essential Question

Essential Question. How does the Constitution protect citizen rights?. Citizen Rights (1). Freedom of Speech. Democratic government requires every person has the right to speak freely. Pure Speech. Verbal expression of opinion before an audience that has chosen to listen. Symbolic Speech.

sandro
Download Presentation

Essential Question

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Essential Question • How does the Constitution protect citizen rights?

  2. Citizen Rights (1)

  3. Freedom of Speech • Democratic government requires every person has the right to speak freely

  4. Pure Speech • Verbal expression of opinion before an audience that has chosen to listen

  5. Symbolic Speech • Using actions and symbols to express opinions

  6. Texas v. Johnson (1989) • Flag-burning is protected as symbolic speech

  7. Limiting Speech • Right of free speech must be balanced against the need to protect society

  8. Seditious Speech • Any speech urging resistance to lawful authority or advocating the overthrow of the government

  9. Court Guidelines • Three constitutional tests to establish limits on speech: • The clear and present danger rule • The bad tendency doctrine • The preferred position doctrine

  10. Clear and Present Danger • When the speech in question clearly presents an immediate danger

  11. Schenck v. United States (1919) • Schenck urged draftees to obstruct the war effort in WWI • During wartime this speech threatened the well-being of the nation

  12. The Bad Tendency Doctrine • Gitlow v. New York (1925) • Speech restricted if it had a tendency to lead to illegal action

  13. Preferred Position Doctrine • First Amendment freedoms hold a preferred position over competing interests • Government must show limiting them is absolutely necessary

  14. Brandenberg v. Ohio • KKK leader arrested for refusing to end a rally and cross burning • Court ruled in his favor as there was no evidence his speech intended to create immediate acts of violence

  15. Defamatory Speech • 1st Amendment does not protect false speech that damages a person’s name • Slander – spoken • Libel - written

  16. “Fighting Words” • Words so insulting they provoke immediate violence • Do not constitute free speech

  17. Freedom of the Press • At times the right of the press to gather and publish information conflicts with other rights

  18. Prior Restraint • Censoring of the press by government • Can only occur in cases related to national security

  19. Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966) • Overturned conviction of murderer because of pre-trial press coverage

  20. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) • Internet speech deserves the same First Amendment protection as print media

  21. Freedom of Assembly • Right of the people to peaceably assemble and petition the government

  22. DeJonge v. Oregon (1937) • DeJonge was convicted of holding a Communist Party meeting • Conviction overturned as peaceful assembly for discussion

  23. Public Assembly • Freedom includes right to parade and demonstrate in public

  24. Cox v. New Hampshire (1941) • A city can require a parade permit in order to march because of safety to citizens

  25. Grayned v. City of Rockford • Upheld a ban on demonstrations near schools that were intended to disrupt classes

  26. The Skokie Case (1977) • The American Nazi Party planned to hold a rally in a Jewish suburb of Chicago • Court allowed the march

  27. Feiner v. New York (1950) • Police arrested a man whose public speaking incited a violent crowd response • Court upheld his arrest as an act to keep the peace

More Related