1 / 19

Is this a benign lesion in a benign condition?

Who Needs Angioplasty in 2008? Stable Angina. Is this a benign lesion in a benign condition?. Keith A A Fox Professor of Cardiology University & Royal Infirmary Edinburgh. Advanced angioplasty 2008. Conflicts of interest slide. Device industry: None

sanne
Download Presentation

Is this a benign lesion in a benign condition?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Who Needs Angioplasty in 2008? • Stable Angina Is this a benign lesion in a benign condition? Keith A A Fox Professor of Cardiology University & Royal Infirmary Edinburgh

  2. Advanced angioplasty 2008 Conflicts of interest slide Device industry: None Grant Funding: British Heart Foundation, Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, ESC, Sanofi-Aventis, BMS, GSK Travel & honoraria: Sanofi-Aventis, BMS, GSK

  3. Event Rates: “Primary Prevention”; Stable Angina ; non-ST Elevation ACS. Death / MI after 12 months 16 12 8 4 0 Approx 1.5% Stable CAD Death/ MI (%) Unstable angina/non Q wave MI (FRISC II) Stable angina (SAPAT) Primary Prevention (WOSCOPS) ACTION trial (stable CAD) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Months of follow up Wallentin L et al. Lancet 2000;356:9–16 Juul-Moller S et al. Lancet 1992;340:1421–1425 Shepherd J et al.N Engl J Med 1995;333:1301–1307 Poole-Wilson et al ACTION Lancet 2004;364:849-57.

  4. salvage of ischaemic myocardium Stable angina Non-ST elevation ACS ST Elevation MI Concepts: Extent of salvage (infarction) proportional to clinical benefit: death or MI Extent of reversible ischaemia proportional to benefit on relief of angina

  5. BHF RITA-3 25 20 15 10 Cumulative percentage 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Follow-up time (years) RITA 3, 5 yr outcome: All deaths Cardiovascular Deaths: p = 0.026 odds ratio: 0.68 95% CI 0.49 – 0.95 15.1% p = 0.054 odds ratio: 0.76 95% CI 0.58 - 1.00 Conservative Intervention 12.1% Death or MI: odds ratio 0.78, 95%CI 0.61-0.99, p= 0.04 Lancet 2005: 366; 914-20

  6. PCI vs. Conservative Therapy: Stable CAD Meta-analysis (pre-COURAGE) Stable CAD & >1 stenosis: 2950 patients from randomized trials (PCI versus conservative medical therapy) Conservative Therapy n=1474 PCI n=1476 • Primary Endpoint: Death, or nonfatal MI, CABG, and PCI during follow-up (in the target vessel or other vessel/segment). Katritsis DG et al Circulation 2005; 111:2906-2912

  7. PCI vs. Conservative Therapy: Meta-Analysis • No significant difference: death, cardiac death or MI, nonfatal MI, and need for CABG # patients Katritsis DG et al Circulation 2005; 111:2906-2912

  8. Stable CAD: PCI vs ConservativeMedical Management Meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials; N = 2,950 Favours PCI Favours Medical Management 0 1 2 Risk ratio (95% Cl) Katritsis DG et al. Circulation. 2005;111:2906-12.

  9. RITA-2: PTCA vs Medical Therapy in Stable Angina(n=1000) Lancet 1997

  10. RITA-2: Impact on Grade 2 Angina (Med v PTCA) RITA-2 Lancet 1997

  11. RITA 2: Quality of Life over 3 years of Follow-up Pocock et al. JACC 2000

  12. PCI vs. Conservative Therapy: Summary • Compared with conservative therapy, PCI does not decrease mortality or the risk of MI during follow-up in patients with chronic CAD. • A trend for increased risk of MI in patients undergoing PCI was observed. • Even when analyses were limited to studies that used stents, the meta-analysis found no evidence of superiority for the PCI strategy. • Need for more randomized trials… Katritsis DG et al Circulation 2005; 111:2906-2912

  13. 2287 patients • objective evidence of myocardial ischemia • stenosis > 70% in > one proximal coronary artery Objective myocardial ischemia: ST-segment depression or T-wave inversion on the resting ECG or inducible ischemia (exercise or vasodilator stress) or at least one coronary stenosis > 80% plus classic angina “Optimal Medical Therapy“ At 5 yrs: 70% had LDL <2.20 mmol per liter) 65% and 94% had systolic and diastolic BP < 130/85 45% of patients with diabetes had Hb A1c <7% High adherence to diet, exercise, and smoking cessation BMS not DES; all patients suitable for PCI; low event rate

  14. COURAGE: Freedom from angina Boden WE et al. N Engl J Med 2007 http://www.nejm.org.

  15. COURAGE: Cumulative event rates (4.6 yrs) Boden WE et al. N Engl J Med 2007 http://www.nejm.org.

  16. COURAGE: Cumulative event rates (4.6 yrs) Boden WE et al. N Engl J Med 2007 http://www.nejm.org.

  17. COURAGE study 2000 2003 Stress Rest Stress Rest Apex Patient randomized to medical treatment only Mid Base After optimal anti-ischemic medical therapy Before treatment Case presented at ACC 2003 by Dr. Robert O´Rourke

  18. Conclusions: 2008 • PCI in stable angina… • Event rates of death & MI approx 1.5% per annum - • on optimal medical therapy • Scope to improve rate of death or MI is very limited - • even in patients with proximal stenosis & inducible ischaemia • PCI is superior to medical therapy (at least over 3 yrs) • in relief of angina, but not longer term • Greater benefit in those with more extensive ischaemia • (>5% LV) • Role of PCI in those with angina and LV dysfunction • is unresolved

More Related