1 / 11

Teacher’s rating of tli and their curriculum

Teacher’s rating of tli and their curriculum . Sarah Williams . INTRODUCTION. 2001 No Child Left Behind High Stakes Testing Curriculum focused on testing Target Testing/Pacing Guides Private Companies (TLI). STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM.

santos
Download Presentation

Teacher’s rating of tli and their curriculum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teacher’s rating of tli and their curriculum Sarah Williams

  2. INTRODUCTION • 2001 No Child Left Behind • High Stakes Testing • Curriculum focused on testing • Target Testing/Pacing Guides • Private Companies (TLI)

  3. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM • To determine how teachers at Ozark Lower, Upper Elementary, Ozark Middle School and Ozark Junior High School rate the effectiveness of TLI testing and pacing guides.

  4. REVIEW OF LITERATURE • Good • Helps align curriculum • Provides data • Aligns to standards, frameworks • Bad • Narrows curriculum • Reduces non tested curriculum time • Takes away self efficacy

  5. METHODS • PARTICIPANTS • Ozark Lower and Upper Elementary • Ozark Middle • Ozark Junior High • INSTRUMENT • Survey: surveymonkey.com • Open Response Questions

  6. METHODS (continued) • Design and Analysis • 25 Teachers responded • 5 Fourth grade • 4 Fifth grade • 5 Sixth grade • 5 Seventh grade • 3 Eighth grade • 2 Ninth grade

  7. QUESTIONS • 1. What grade do you teach? • 2. What subject do you teach? • 3. Is your course Benchmark tested for your grade level? • 4. Do you feel you were properly trained in how to administer and use TLI? • 5.Do you think TLI provides adequate feedback? • 6.How would you rate TLI pacing guide for your subject?

  8. QUESTIONS (continued) • 7. What, if any, do you think are the strengths of TLI’s pacing guide and test material? • 8. What do you think are the problems with TLI’s pacing guide and testing material? • 9. What suggestions do you have on improving our schools use of TLI? • 10. Do you think by using TLI it has limited what and when you can teach your curriculum?

  9. DISCUSSION/ANAYLSIS • Data shows some disagreement on overall adequacy. • Some views are negative because questions do not match benchmark. • The sample did not think that the pacing guide limited curriculum or their self efficacy. • There was limitations with data since so few teachers responded to survey (25).

  10. RECOMMENDATIONS • Provide standardization of the TLI throughout the district. • Make sure all faculty within the district receive TLI training and TLI technology training. • Provide teachers within the district time for TLI assessment analysis.

  11. CONCLUSION • Even though the data from the teachers indicate that they disagreed on whether TLI adequately met their needs. • Teachers did indicate that it helped identify strengths and weaknesses within their students. • Teachers did agree did help standardize the curriculum.

More Related