1 / 33

Literature/data integration and

Explore the importance of data integration in digital repositories and how it maximizes access and preservation of valuable research data. Learn about the features and benefits of Dryad, a nonprofit organization that manages data packages associated with published literature. Discover the data archiving landscape and find out how Dryad stands out as a unique and authoritative source for data citations.

sarahr
Download Presentation

Literature/data integration and

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Literature/data integration and Ryan Scherle Data Repository Architect Dryad Digital Repository HighWire Fall Publishers’ Meeting November 20, 2013 You may reuse any of the original content in these slides as you wish, provided you attribute the source

  2. CC-BY-NC-SA nic221 http://www.flickr.com/photos/nic221/391536867/

  3. CC-BY Adamo http://www.piqs.de/fotos/121272.html Bumpus HC (1898) The Elimination of the Unfit as Illustrated by the Introduced Sparrow, Passer domesticus. Biological Lectures from the Marine Biological Laboratory: 209-226.

  4. Who cares if the data is lost? James Cook, portrait by Nathaniel Dance-Holland, c. 1775, National Maritime Museum, Greenwich By Agrant141 (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

  5. Who cares if the data is lost? n=3824 Source: Publishing Research Consortium, http://publishingresearch.net

  6. Data “available upon request” Wicherts and colleagues requested data from from 141 articles in American Psychological Association journals. “6 months later, after … 400 emails, [sending] detailed descriptions of our study aims, approvals of our ethical committee, signed assurances not to share data with others, and even our full resumes…” only 27% of authors complied Wicherts JM, Borsboom D, Kats J, Molenaar D(2006) doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726

  7. Fighting data entropy Time of publication Specific details General details Retirement or career change Information Content Accident Death Time (Michener et al. 1997)

  8. Funder policies US funding agencies that require or strongly recommend data sharing: • CDC • DOD • DOE • EPA • NASA • NIH • NIST • NOAA • NSF • USDA

  9. Joint data archiving policy Data are important products of the scientific enterprise, and they should be preserved and usable for decades in the future. As a condition for publication, data supporting the results in the article should be deposited in an appropriate public archive. Authors may elect to embargo access to the data for a period up to a year after publication. Exceptions may be granted at the discretion of the editor, especially for sensitive information. http://datadryad.org/pages/jdap

  10. Impact factor and archiving policies IF=3.6 IF=6.0 IF=4.5 n=70 Piwowar HA, Chapman WW (2008) hdl:10101/npre.2008.1700.1

  11. Data archiving landscape There are so many data repositories that we need directories of them: • http://re3data.org • http://DataBib.org These repositories vary along many dimensions: • Datatype focus • Community focus • Allowed file sizes • Curation policies • Data access policies • Funding model

  12. Data archiving landscape General Figshare Genbank Zenodo Pangaea Dryad Community Focus Institutional Repository Supplemental Materials Lab Database Focused General Focused Datatype Focus

  13. Dryad vs supplementary materials * A few publisher SOM sites are exceptions to the general rule ** Practices differ among publishers, see Smit (2011), doi:10.1045/january2011-smit

  14. What makes Dryad unique • Tight focus on data associated with published literature • Data packages are curated • Open development process allows broad participation • Nonprofit organization managed by stakeholders DataDryad.org

  15. Dryad features Quick and easy submission process…

  16. Dryad features …referencing authoritative sources…

  17. Dryad features …and leveraging integration with journals…

  18. Dryad features …to maximize the submitter’s valuable time.

  19. DataDryad.org

  20. Data citations Best practice is to cite both the article and the data – they are both useful research products But limit data citations to one data packageper article – this eliminates most concerns about the size/granularity of data files DataDryad.org

  21. DataDryad.org

  22. Materials and Methods References

  23. Dryad uptake >4,000 data packages containing >12,000 files associated with articles in 275 journals 200 submissions each month and growing Some data packages have been downloaded more than 10,000 times Fewer than 10% of authors chose to embargo their data when this option is allowed by the journal

  24. Price schedule

  25. Sponsoring open data Publishers, societies, and other organizations are now sponsoring deposits in 44 Journals

  26. In development… Added value for journals, including a data display widget and a dashboard for editors

  27. Integrated article & data submission Key functionality • Makes data deposition simple for authors (once files are prepared) • Ensures permanent link to data within each article (and vice versa). Options are customized to meet journal policies • Data can be submitted prior to manuscript review or upon acceptance • Journals may allow authors the option of a embargoing data for 1 year after publication

  28. To learn more Repository home: http://datadryad.org News: http://blog.datadryad.org Twitter: @datadryad Ryan Scherle, ryan@datadryad.org

More Related