1 / 36

Potential + /- Difference Inc.

Potential + /- Difference Inc. Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology Demonstration University of Ottawa Lab. Demo Test # 1 Conventional Generator vs. Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology.

sarila
Download Presentation

Potential + /- Difference Inc.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Potential +/- Difference Inc. Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology Demonstration University of Ottawa Lab

  2. Demo Test # 1Conventional Generator vs. Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology • The Regenerative Acceleration Generator is very similar to any conventional generator but it also employs extra high voltage coils to counteract and reverse the effects of armature reaction (or Lenz’s Law) inside the generator.

  3. When the Regenerative Acceleration Generator delivers power to the same load (light bulb) NOW the generator causes the motor to accelerate. Now the motor is consuming the least power while the generator is delivering the maximum power. Rotor speed is maximum at 3500 RPM. Demo Test # 1 Conventional Generator vs. Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology • When a conventional generator delivers power to a load (light bulb) the generator causes the motor (prime mover) todecelerate. • In the above photo the motor is consuming the maximum power but delivering virtually no power. • Rotor speed is only 100 RPM.

  4. Demo Test # 1 Conventional Generator vs. Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology • INPUT POWER REDUCTION = 41% • OUTPUT POWER INCREASE = 373% • The Regenerative Acceleration Generator has the proven ability to increase generator output energy by more than 373% over a conventional generator while at the same time decreasing motor input energy by 41%.

  5. Demo Test # 2Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization Further Regenerative Acceleration Generator developments include the optimization of the high voltage coils to deliver increased generator output power with system acceleration and the elimination of the high current coils.

  6. Demo Test # 2 Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization • NO LOAD CONDITION • At full speed and with no load on the generator the system’s steady state speed is 3433 RPM. • The prime mover is consuming 166 Watts. • The generator is turned off and delivering 0 Watts.

  7. Demo Test # 2 Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization • ON LOAD CONDITION • Now the generator is turned on, delivering 31 Watts to the load (light bulbs). • The generator has accelerated the motor 11 RPM up to 3444 RPM from the no load speed of 3433 RPM. • The motor input power has decreased by 6 Watts down to 160 Watts from the previous 166 Watt no load condition. • Currently only two coils are employed but the rotor can accommodate at least 33.

  8. Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.Conventional Generator • Now a conventional generator coil has been added (gold & green coil). • The conventional generator coil is mounted on the opposite side of the rotor and employs 6 poles (magnets). • We will compare the conventional generator reaction to loading vs. the regenerative acceleration generator performance.

  9. Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.Conventional Generator • NO LOAD CONDITION • Motor Power = 282 Watts • Steady State Speed = 3283 RPM

  10. Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs. Conventional Generator • ON LOAD CONDITION CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR • Conventional generator delivers 6.4 Watts to the load (light bulb). • Motor power consumption increases 10 Watts to 293 Watts. • Speed decreases 21 RPM to 3262 RPM.

  11. Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.Conventional Generator • ON LOAD CONDITIONCONVENTIONAL GENERATOR and PEREPITEIA GENERATOR • Both conventional generator and regenerative acceleration generators are now delivering power to their loads. • Conventional generator delivers 6.4 Watts • Regenerative acceleration generator delivers 37.4 Watts • Motor power has decreased 19 Watts down to 274 Watts • Speed has increased 49 RPM up to 3311 RPM.

  12. Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.Conventional Generator • CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR OFF LOAD • PEREPITEIA GENERATOR ON LOAD. • Now the conventional generator has been turned off. • The regenerative acceleration generator output increases to 39 Watts. • Motor power decreases 15 Watts down to 259 Watts. • Speed increases to 3334 RPM.

  13. Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs. Conventional Generator • PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY • Conventional generator on load alone delivers an output 6.35 Watts with a corresponding prime mover power input increase of 4% or 11 Watts. • Regenerative acceleration generator and conventional generator on load deliver a combined output of 43.8 Watts with a prime mover input reduction of 19 Watts. • This represents a 589% output power increase with a 6.5% input power decrease. • Regenerative acceleration generator alone delivers a 498% output power increase over the conventional generator alone with a 11.6% decrease in prime mover input.

  14. Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs. Conventional Generator PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY Generator TypeOutput PowerArmature Reaction Input Increase / Decrease Conventional 6.35 W 11 Watt Generator Increase Regenerative 43.8 W 19 Watt Acceleration Decrease Generator (589% output power increase with a 6.5% input power decreaseover the conventional generator)

  15. Potential +/- Difference Inc. Bi-Toroid TransformerTechnology DemonstrationUniversity of Ottawa Lab

  16. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • Conventional transformer NO LOAD. • Coil current = 71 mA • Power factor = 0 • Load voltage = 0 volts

  17. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • Conventional transformer ON LOAD. • Coil current = 139 mA • Power factor = 1 • Load voltage = 3.6 volts

  18. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • Bi-Toroid Transformer NO LOAD. • Coil current = 130 mA • Power factor = 0 • Load voltage = 0 volts

  19. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • Bi-Toroid Transformer ON LOAD. • Coil current = 130 mA • Power factor = 0 • Load voltage = 1.6 volts

  20. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer ON LOAD NO LOAD ON LOAD Conventional Transformer Bi-Toroid Transformer Bi-Toroid Transformer Power Factor = 1 Power Factor = 0 Power Factor = 0

  21. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer Primary Coil Current and Power Factor Comparison Conventional Conventional Bi-Toroid Bi-Toroid Transformer Transformer Transformer Transformer NO Load ON Load NO Load ON Load Current 71 139 130 130 mA Power 0 1 0 0 Factor

  22. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer Bi-Toroid Transformer NO LOAD Bi-Toroid Transformer ON LOAD The above photo-data show the power factor (Pf) of the Bi-Toroid transformer with an increased 18.5 input voltage. The power factor is virtually unchanged.

  23. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • Although it is hard to believe the above left close up scope shot is the Bi-Toroid NO LOAD and the right is ON LOAD. • There is a slight 25%increase in primary coil current (100 mA) with the higher input voltage although the power factor is virtually zero.

  24. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer Conventional Transformer ON LOAD With an increased 18.5 volt input to the primary coil, the conventional transformer’s purely resistive load dictates the primary coil’s power factor of 1 and the primary current quadruples.

  25. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • In the conventional transformer, the primary coil delivers flux to the secondary coil via the transformer’s ferromagnetic core. • A voltage is induced in the secondary coil. • On no load, the primary coil’s voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase and only reactive power exists in the primary coil. • Primary Real Power = 0

  26. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • When the secondary coil is placed on load, current flows in the coil. • This current produces a secondary induced flux (blue) which couples back to the primary coil. • This secondary flux reduces the primary coil’s impedance (AC resistance) and more source current enters the primary coil. • The increase in primary current increases the primary flux (red) and this flux increase maintains the voltage across the load. • The load power factor is transferred back to the primary and now real power is consumed in the primary coil.

  27. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer

  28. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • In the Bi-Toroid transformer the primary flux is divided between the two secondary coils – Secondary 1 and Secondary 2. • Voltages are induced in both secondary coils. • The primary coil’s voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase and only reactive power exists in the primary coil. • Primary Real Power = 0 Watts.

  29. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer

  30. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer • When the Bi-Toroid transformer is placed on load the secondary induced fluxes DO NOT enter the primary core leg due to its higher reluctance (magnetic resistance). • Instead Secondary 1’s flux enters Secondary 2 and vise versa and the coils self regulate their own voltages across the loads. • Real power is delivered to the loads. • Primary Real Power = 0 Watts.

  31. Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY Transformer TypeNo LoadOn Load Conventional Primary draws Primary draws Transformer reactive power real power power factor mirrors load Bi-Toroid Primary draws Primary draws Transformer reactive power reactive power power factor ignores load

  32. Demo Test # 5New Bi-Toroid Transformer Design & Performance TestsJuly 11, 2009 • The next generation Bi-Toroid Transformer design includes an additional secondary core, which provides another secondary coil induced flux path route – keeping it away from the primary core.

  33. Demo Test # 5New Bi-Toroid Transformer Design & Performance TestsJuly 11, 2009 • Performance Data • Primary Input Voltage = 58.8 volts • Primary Input Current = 0.017 amps • Primary Power Factor = 85 degrees / 0.087 • Primary Input Power = 87.1 mWatts

  34. Demo Test # 5New Bi-Toroid Transformer Design & Performance TestsJuly 11, 2009 • Primary voltage and current sine waves • Pf = 85 degrees or cos85 = 0.087 • Each mark on the X axis = 6.92 degrees (x 26 = 180 degrees)

  35. Demo Test # 5New Bi-Toroid Transformer Design & Performance TestsJuly 11, 2009 • Performance Data • Primary Input Voltage = 58.8 volts • Primary Input Current = 0.017 amps • Primary Power Factor = 85 degrees / 0.087 • Primary Input Power = 87.1 mWatts • Secondary Load = 27 ohms • Secondary Load Voltage = 3.1 volts • Secondary Output Power = 356 mWatts • Transformer Efficiency = 409%

  36. Potential +/- Difference Inc. Christopher Napior V.P. Business Development Potential Difference Inc. 613.292.7730 office 613.692.2220 fax napior@rogers.com

More Related