130 likes | 241 Views
It’s Transactions, Stupid! Networks of Czech Social Movement Organizations Twenty Years after Communism. Ondrej Cisar and Jiri Navratil Institute for Comparative Political Research Masaryk University. Specific Research Goals/Questions.
E N D
It’s Transactions, Stupid! Networks of Czech Social Movement Organizations Twenty Years after Communism Ondrej Cisar and Jiri Navratil Institute for Comparative Political Research Masaryk University
Specific Research Goals/Questions • How do the networks of Czech SMOs look like? Are there differences between the distribution of particular network properties in the case of post-materialistically-oriented ‘new’ SMOs and the ‘old’ type of participatory activism? • What accounts for the observed variation in network properties?
Two Modes of Activism • Participatory activism - its strength and legitimacy depends on its ability to mobilize a significant number of followers, who also supply it with necessary resources (trade unions…). • Transactional activism - its strength depends on its (transactional) capacity to link up with other organizations, and integrate them into broader platforms (environmentalists, human rights…).
Expectations • Descriptive part Two different network structures – a dense networking of transactional activists and a less dense networking of participatory activists • Explanatory part The bigger the exposure to international assistance programs, the bigger the capacity on the part of a local organization to assume a central position within inter-organizational networks.
Data: Czech SMOs Survey • sectors: environmental, women’s rights, gay and lesbian, civil rights, developmental, agrarian, socialservices, radical Left groups, and trade unions • snow-ball sampling (some sectors supplemented byexpert knowledge), 70 % response rate, N=220 • key informant face-to-face interviewing using a standardized questionnaire, October 2007 – December 2009
Operationalization • Two dimensions of horizontal transactional capacity: „real“ (sharing resources) and „nominal“ (potential facilitation of information flow) • Real ties – existing relations of cooperation among SMOs – all-degree centrality measure • Nominal ties – position of actor within the whole network – betweenness centrality measure
Network(s) of Czech SMOs I. Weak components of the network (energy layout, Kamada-Kawai, separate components, adjusted)
Network(s) of Czech SMOs II. Distribution of the all-degree centrality within the network - main issue area (energy layout, Fruchterman Reingold)
Network(s) of Czech SMOs III. Distribution of the all-degree centrality within the network – internally mobilized resources (energy layout, Fruchterman Reingold)
Network(s) of Czech SMOs IV. Extraction of the strong network components – the main issue area (energy layout, Fruchterman Reingold, adjusted)
Network(s) of Czech SMOs V. Extraction of the strong network components – internally mobilized resources (energy layout, Fruchterman Reingold, adjusted)
Questions • Operationalization • Explanation model improvement • Structure of argument