1 / 25

Crime and Deviance

Crime and Deviance. Why?. First impressions: Why do people commit crimes? Why do people do drugs?. Stan Eitzen: mythbuster. US: religious and violently criminal no crime wave now problem mainly among youth (males esp.) home more dangerous than street no crime gene

sasson
Download Presentation

Crime and Deviance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Crime and Deviance

  2. Why? First impressions: Why do people commit crimes? Why do people do drugs?

  3. Stan Eitzen: mythbuster • US: religious and violently criminal • no crime wave now • problem mainly among youth (males esp.) • home more dangerous than street • no crime gene • social variables related to crime: • poverty • unemployment • racial segregation • family instability • inequality

  4. Merton: structural strain theory Socially approved goals (values) Socially approved means (norms) Unequal access creates “structural strain” Individuals experiencing structural strain must choose a “mode of adaptation” to the resulting anomie.

  5. Structural strain theory

  6. Crime rates: scares vs. realities (Heiner) • Missing children • Serial killers • Crack “epidemic”

  7. Crime Scares: what is the evidence? • Missing children: 50,000 or 500-1,000? • Serial murder: 4,000 or 50-70? • Drug scare: what happened to the crack epidemic?

  8. Crime rates: measures • Index crimes (UCR from FBI) • Victimization studies (DoJ) • http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance.htm

  9. Crime rates: index crime trend Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/cv2.htm

  10. Crime in Context • Rosenfeld (Contexts: Spring 2002): • What caused the 1980s rise in the first place? • Drugs—esp. crack • Guns

  11. Rosenfeld: Crime in Context • What factors account for the decline? • Crack market decline (youth) • Domestic violence trends (adults) • Decrease in marriage • Domestic violence prevention programs • Policing (evidence weak) • Prison boom (what about releases?) • Economy (always strongest correlation)

  12. Rosenfeld: “the big picture” • Multiple, interacting factors • LaFree: rise and fall of institutional legitimacy • Institutions regulate behavior to meet human needs • High legitimacy, people “play by the rules; low crime rate • Low legitimacy, institutions unable to control behavior; crime goes up

  13. How bad is white-collar crime? • We don’t know—no index, no statistics overall, no easy way to discern trends • More harmful than street crime? • Greater monetary cost • Greater cost in lives, if consider tobacco alone • Mokhiber: activist frame says corporations are the problem; essentially anti-democratic • Higher immorality effects

  14. C. Wright Mills: the higher immorality • “Of course, there may be corrupt men in sound institutions, but when institutions are corrupting, many of the men who live and work in them are necessarily corrupted. In the corporate era, economic relations become impersonal-and the executive feels less personal responsibility. Within the corporate worlds of business, war-making and politics, the private conscience is attenuated-and the higher immorality is institutionalized. It is not merely a question of a corrupt administration in corporation, army, or state; it is a feature of the corporate rich, as a capitalist stratum, deeply intertwined with the politics of the military state.” Source: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Book_Excerpts/HigherImmorality_PE.html

  15. Heiner: 3 main American values • Freedom • Individualism • Competition

  16. C. Wright Mills: the higher immorality • “There is still one old American value that has not markedly declined: the value of money and of the things money can buy-these, even in inflated times, seem as solid and enduring as stainless steel.” Source: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Book_Excerpts/HigherImmorality_PE.html

  17. Enron: multinational corporation • 1997: exempt from Investment Company Act of 1940 • This allowed them to create 3,000 limited partnerships; many “offshore,” used to hide debts • Received hundreds of millions of dollars in federal subsidies for overseas investments • Paid $0.00 in federal taxes four of last five years • Stood to get $250 tax rebate from Bush’s proposed economic stimulus package

  18. Enron’s transgressions • Hid debts • Accounting firm (Arthur Anderson) was also consultant, colluded in hiding the debts • Top 12 executives sold stock worth a billion dollars before price tanked • Employees, investors left holding the bag

  19. C. Wright Mills: the higher immorality • “A society that is in its higher circles and on its middle levels widely believed to be a network of smart rackets does not produce men with an inner moral sense; a society that is merely expedient does not produce men of conscience. A society that narrows the meaning of 'success' to the big money and in its terms condemns failure as the chief vice, raising money to the plane of absolute value, will produce the sharp operator and the shady deal. Blessed are the cynical, for only they have what it takes to succeed.” Source: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Book_Excerpts/HigherImmorality_PE.html

  20. Solutions • Eitzen on street crime: conservative and progressive options • Conservative: get tough • Progressive: get roots (poverty, racism, etc.) • Mokhiber on white collar crime: democratic control of corporations

  21. Sutherland: differential association Criminal (deviant) behavior is learned in primary groups where norms differ from those of wider society

  22. Differential association Dominant culture social norms Deviant subculture social norms X

  23. Becker: labeling theory • Social structure gives some people the power to define others as deviant • The label is a stigma; a mark of social disgrace that changes social interaction and self image

  24. Lemert: labeling theory • Primary deviation: an initial act that violates social norms • Secondary deviation: the individual comes to accept the label, and acts accordingly

  25. Labeling theory Powerful interests Label Primary deviation Label accepted Secondary deviation

More Related