60 likes | 151 Views
Number Optimization Working Group (NRO-WG) Report. NANC Meeting Washington D.C. September 19, 2000. Meetings held since July NANC: August 10, 2000 - Chicago August 25, 2000 - conference call September 6, 2000 - Kansas City September 14, 2000 - conference call .
E N D
Number Optimization Working Group (NRO-WG) Report NANC Meeting Washington D.C. September 19, 2000
Meetings held since July NANC: • August 10, 2000 - Chicago • August 25, 2000 - conference call • September 6, 2000 - Kansas City • September 14, 2000 - conference call • Future meetings scheduled: • September 28, 2000 - conference call, 1 - 4 PM Eastern • (conference bridge 954-797-0718, PIN 982913) • October 11 - 13, 2000 - Seattle WA. • October 26, 2000 - conference call • November 9, 2000 - Washington, D.C.
Fees for Reservation Extensions • Letter forwarded to NANC Chair on September 15th • NRO-WG recommends: • End users should be allowed to extend their reservations, • subject to the payment of a common monthly fee • The fee should be set at a level that compels end users to • retain only those reservations they actually need • Service providers should be allowed to retain that portion • of the fee that covers their costs • Revenues collected in excess of costs, should be remitted • to the NBANC to be used to offset number optimization • and administration costs. • Service providers may choose to not offer extensions • Service providers that do choose to offer extensions • (subject to fees) should not be penalized for doing so.
Fees (continued) • Questions raised on the fee amount: • Should the fee be discounted for certain classes of customers • (e.g., governmental agencies, not-for-profit organizations, etc.)? • At what level does the fee become a disincentive to end users for • holding reservations they don’t actually need? • At what level does the fee become cost-prohibitive, even for end • users that desperately need to retain their reservations? • At what level does the fee ensure that most carriers can cover • their costs for reserving numbers? • Should carriers remit revenues collected in excess of fees, if the • amount is insignificant?
Fees (continued) • Wide range of opinions on these questions from NRO-WG participants, • which included representatives from ILECs, CLECs, Wireless carriers, • state PUCs and consumer groups. • Participants acknowledged the lack of empirical data and expertise to • render a fully supportable decision on the fee amount. • Participants also acknowledged that completion of a thorough economic • study may not be possible by December 1. • As an interim measure, the NRO-WG recommends that the FCC set a • minimum rate of $0.25 per reserved number, per month. Service • providers with higher costs should be allowed to set a higher interim fee. • The interim fee will address the current situation whereby many service • providers offer reservations at little or no charge.
Other NRO-WG Activities • Work continues on a COCUS requirements document. Objective • is to complete by October NANC meeting. • Discussion has begun on ITN pooling. Objective is to complete a • recommendation by November NANC meeting or sooner. • Consensus reached to allow the INC LNPA workshop to develop a • report/recommendation on UNP, since work is already underway • within that committee and it is staffed by many of the same people. The NRO-WG co-chairs invite and encourage all NANC and NARUC members to actively participate in the NRO-WG meetings and conference calls.