1 / 23

European Regional Policy 2007-2013: Regional Competitiveness Objective

European Regional Policy 2007-2013: Regional Competitiveness Objective. From Objective 2 to Regional Competitiveness: Experiences & Lessons Turin, 15-16 September 2005 Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

saul
Download Presentation

European Regional Policy 2007-2013: Regional Competitiveness Objective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. European Regional Policy 2007-2013: Regional Competitiveness Objective From Objective 2 to Regional Competitiveness: Experiences & Lessons Turin, 15-16 September 2005 Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

  2. European Policies Research Centre • specialises in comparative research on public policy throughout Europe • focus on monitoring and analysis of regional development policies at European and national levels • policy advice and exchange of experience through two networks: • EoRPA (European Regional Policy Research Network) - national government departments responsible for regional policy – 10 countries • IQ-Net (Improving the Quality of Programme Management) – regional and national Structural Fund programme management authorities from 12 Member States www.eprc.strath.ac.uk/iqnet/

  3. IQ-Net partners – regional and national programme management authorities • Belgium • Min of Flemish Community • Austria • Lower Austria • Styria • Denmark • North Jutland/Nat Agency • Italy • Lombardy • Tuscany • IPI/MAP • Finland • Western Finland Alliance • Ministry of the Interior • Hungary • National Office for • Regional Development • France • DATAR/CNASEA • Spain • País Vasco • Germany • North-Rhine Westphalia • Saxony Anhalt • Sweden • Norra Norrland • Norra • United Kingdom • North-East England • ODPM • Wales (WEFO) • Western Scotland (SEP) • Greece • Min of Economy & Finance

  4. From Objective 2 to Regional Competitiveness: Experiences & Lessons • Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness issues: review of trends • Programme management and delivery: strengths and weaknesses • Looking forward: pressures and opportunities • Looking forward: questions and issues

  5. Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness:review of trends • Relationship between Structural Funds and Lisbon • Priorities for support • business competitiveness • employment • knowledge economy and innovation • sustainable development • accessibility

  6. Objective 2 programmes and Lisbon:shared objectives • some congruence between the objectives of the Lisbon agenda and Structural Funds objectives (economic growth, high employment, low unemployment, environmental sustainability) • most Lisbon investment themes are present in SF programmes (employment, IT infra, R&D, HRD, business development, social inclusion, environmentally sustainable development) • share of SF support allocated to fields directly relevant for Lisbon is high in O2 regions, frequently above 50% (much less in O1 regions – 18-33 percent)

  7. Objective 2 programmes and Lisbon: differences and tensions • Tensions • economic growth vs economic and social cohesion • different priority to higher aggregate EU rate of growth • important spatial dimension to Structural Funds • Structural Funds decentralised, Lisbon is top down • prioritisation of investment

  8. Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness: business development Trends – shifts from…… • general business investment support (often through grant schemes), especially for new start-ups and SMEs • provision of premises, creation or equipping of business centres • site (re)development / rehabilitation ......towards more support for • inter-firm cooperation / business networks • advisory/counselling services to business (esp. strategic planning, internationalisation) • integrated, multi-service business support within business centres • targeted start-up support (university graduates, young entrepreneurs, women, innovative activities, employment-intensive growth areas) • micro-enterprises and community enterprises • access to finance Problems with business demand because of downturn in the business cycle

  9. Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness: employment Trends – shifts from…… • general skills-based training measures (employed / unemployed) • sector-specific training programmes • investment in the training infrastructure ......towards more support for • targeted training on specific groups eg. women, youth, disabled, immigrants (ltd) • development of new training methods (ICT teaching techniques, distance learning, HRD management) • training related to innovation and ICT Community development remains important for urban programmes – mix of social, employment and economic measures – more cross-cutting approaches Problem of some programmes (c.40%) being without ESF component

  10. Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness: innovation & the knowledge economy Trends – shifts from…… • investment in RTD infrastructure (science parks, technology centres, university facilities) • incentives for business R&D and innovation • business-research links ......towards more support for • integrated support (regional innovation system approach) – research services, entrepreneurship, training, business advice • broadening of business-research links  innovation networks • ICT: access/use by businesses (e-commerce), communities, public sector • access to specialist finance (risk capital, venture capital, seed capital) • environmental RTDI • human capital – training of researchers

  11. Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness: sustainable development Trends – shifts from…… • environmental infrastructure projects eg. waste-processing • clean-up and rehabilitation of derelict / contaminated sites • protection /enhancement of areas of ecological interest ......towards more support for • company-based environmental and energy management • development of green areas, outdoor space, natural parks, protected areas • investment in renewable energy sources • sustainable development management/monitoring projects • preservation of biodiversity / wildlife

  12. Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness: accessibility Trends – shifts from…… • basic transport infrastructure – road and rail networks, ports, telecoms ......towards more support for • secondary infrastructure links (feeder roads, bottlenecks, missing links) • development of multimodal and intermodal transport facilities • logistics projects to improve use of physical/ICT infrastructure • improvement of transport-related services (eg. port services) • information exchange networks (eg. joint municipal computer systems)

  13. Objective 2 programmes and regional competitiveness: overall trends • More strategic approach to interventions • Better integration of support – linking interventions together eg: • RTDI – technology centre facilities, with technology transfer, brokerage, access to finance, training, community awareness etc • Human resources – competence development combined with interfirm cooperation, ICT • Greater targeting – identifying and addressing gaps in the system; focusing support on specific groups • Territorial focus – in some programmes • Investing in capacity to support/manage interventions

  14. Programme management and delivery Implementation of Structural Fund Programmes - strengths and weaknesses: • management • delivery – project generation, selection, appraisal • monitoring

  15. Programme management - trends • Shift in programme management responsibilities towards the regions • Delegation or decentralisation of aspects of programme delivery to regional and local intermediaries • Streamlining of administration eg. use of measure managers • Use of larger or framework projects • Better information exchange within programme networks

  16. Programme management -challenges • Strategic constraints: • fragmentation of eligible areas • relationship between EU and domestic policies • Coordination problems increasing – vertically and horizontally • Mixed record on ERDF:ESF coordination • Need for investment in capacity building - resources inadequate for coordination / implementation • Involvement of the private sector

  17. Project delivery - trends • Improved implementation systems – more rigorous project selection procedures, better financial control and evaluation and improved monitoring systems • Emphasis on project quality and stronger underlying strategic rationale (legacy) • Better communication with partners (part driven by publicity and communication) – increase in intensity and sophistication of communication • Progressive shift to ‘pro-active management’ – part driven by strategic ambitions, part defensive to avoid problems with n+2

  18. Programme delivery - challenges • Standard measures going well, but difficulties with implementing more innovative types of measures • Impact of n+2 – pressure to spend has impact on project quality in some MS • Over-ambitious systems - problems of over-complex project application, selection and monitoring systems • Accessibility problems, eg. measures structured to suit administrative bodies rather than beneficiaries • Under-used/exploited area is project follow-up and aftercare • Poor integration of environment into project application process in some programmes

  19. Programme monitoring • Step change in quality of monitoring – ambitious measures to improve: • monitoring infrastructure • indicator frameworks • monitoring practices • capacities • Despite investment, monitoring remains a weakness in many programmes related to: • partial and unreliable data from beneficiaries • differences in interpretation among implementing bodies • systemic problems

  20. Looking forward: external pressures • Less money • New thematic priorities • No EU-level geographical targeting • New financial management arrangements

  21. Looking forward: internal pressures Evolution of added value since 1989 suggests the need to rejuvenate some Objective 2 programmes: Added Value • “accommodation” • (1989-93) 2. “development and innovation” (1994-99) 3. “consolidation” (2000-06)

  22. Looking forward: new opportunities • Advanced process of regional restructuring / diversification platform for development • Stronger regional institutions – devolution / deconcentration of economic development • Networks of intermediaries – economic, social and environmental actors • Legacy of partnership – taken on within domestic policies • Greater national and EU policy coherence • shared commitment to Lisbon agenda (to greater or lesser extent) • process of formulating a shared agenda – CSF/NSRF • concrete steps being taken to align EU and domestic policy priorities

  23. Looking forward: challenges Questions/issues: • regional policy vs sectoral policy priorities? • spatial focus of interventions – broad/narrow; areas of opportunity/need; urban/rural? • limits to Lisbon (potential conflicts, capacity issues?) • adapting programme management – fewer resources, need for coordination? • supportive SF Regulations? • implications of State aid reforms?

More Related