1 / 77

Orthopedic Urgencies and Emergencies:

Orthopedic Urgencies and Emergencies:. Problems You Don’t Want to Miss!. Francis G. O’Connor, MD, FACSM Director, Primary Care Sports Medicine Uniformed Services University. Objectives.

saxon
Download Presentation

Orthopedic Urgencies and Emergencies:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Orthopedic Urgencies and Emergencies: Problems You Don’t Want to Miss! Francis G. O’Connor, MD, FACSM Director, Primary Care Sports Medicine Uniformed Services University

  2. Objectives • Discuss common orthopedic urgencies and emergencies that are not uncommonly misdiagnosed and/or initially mismanaged. • Detail pertinent diagnostic features and clinical criteria for referral to an orthopedic colleague.

  3. Case 1 • Patient is a 16 y/o soccer player who presents to the ER with a painful forearm after a FOOSH injury. He is quite tender to palpation over the proximal forearm and has visible deformity. The skin is intact. Neurovascular examination is normal. • Radiographs. • Patient is placed in a long arm splint. • Prior to discharge from the ED for Ortho f/u in the am, the patient complains of thumb numbness.

  4. Acute Compartment Syndrome

  5. Epidemiology • Compartment Syndrome(CS) is a serious life and limb-threatening complication of extremity trauma. • Fractures, burns, crush injuries and arterial injuries can all result in CS. • Three quarters of cases are associated with fractures; tibia most common. • Other sites include: hand; forearm; arm; shoulder; back; buttocks; thigh; foot.

  6. Pathophysiology • CS develops when there is increased pressure within a closed tissue space e.g. muscle compartments bound by fascial sheaths. • Increased pressure compromises the flow of blood through vessels supplying contained muscles and nerves. • External: circumferential cast or burn eschar • Internal: edema or soft tissue hematoma formation

  7. Clinical Anatomy • Each limb contains a number of compartments at risk for CS. • Upper arm: anterior(biceps-brachialis) and posterior(triceps). • Forearm: volar(flexors) and dorsal(extensors) • 3 gluteal, 2 thigh, 4 in the lower leg.

  8. Diagnosis • High index of clinical suspicion, with pain out of proportion to the mechanism of injury being the hallmark symptom. • Five Ps: pain; paresthesia; paresis; pallor; pulses. • Loss of normal sensation is the most reliable sign. • Diagnosis is based on the compartment pressure.

  9. Radiographic Findings • Common fractures associated with ACS: • tibial fractures • supracondylar fractures of the humerus • humeral shaft • forearm fractures • multiple metacarpal or metatarsal fractures • Lisfranc fractures • calcaneal fractures

  10. Pressure Monitoring • Normal tissue pressure ranges between 0 and 10mmHg. • Capillary blood flow is compromised at 20 mmHg, while the muscles and nerves are at risk for ischemic necrosis at pressures greater than 30 to 40 mmHg.

  11. Treatment • Acute CS is a surgical emergency. • Delays over 24 hrs can result in myoglobinuria, renal failure, metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, ischemic contracture. • Indications for fasciotomy: • clinical signs of CS • tissue pressure over 30 mmHg with clinical picture of CS • interrupted arterial circulation over 4 hours.

  12. Case 1 Follow-up • Clinical diagnosis of ACS made. • Taken to the OR for ORIF and compartment fasciotomy. • Delayed skin closure.

  13. Case 2 • Pt is a 45 y/o male with a history of colon CA, who presents with a history of low back pain and a history of new onset bladder incontinence.

  14. Cauda Equina Syndrome

  15. Epidemiology • 80% of the population experiences back pain at some point in their lives. • 90% of low back pain resolves in 6 -12 weeks • “Red Flag” symptoms include: age over 50, trauma, fever, incontinence, night pain, weight loss, progressive weakness. • Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare disorder, representing only 0.0004% of all back pain patients

  16. Clinical Anatomy • Three joint motion complex consisting of the facets and the intervertebral disc. • The spinal cord extends from the foramen magnum to the L1-L2 disk where the cauda equina continues to the coccygeal region

  17. Mechanism of Injury • Usually secondary to extrinsic pressure from a massive central HNP • Other causes include: • epidural abscess • epidural tumor • epidural hematoma • trauma

  18. Clinical Presentation • Bilateral leg symptoms that include sciatica, weakness, sensory changes and gait disturbance. • Physical examination demonstrates bilateral weakness as well as decreased sensation, in particular in the “saddle” region. • Sphincter tone is decreased in 60 to 80% of patients • All patients who complain of urinary or fecal incontinence should be considered to have CES until proven otherwise.

  19. Diagnosis • Clinical diagnosis: • loss of bladder control; perianal numbness; pain and weakness involving both legs • Evaluation of the urinary post-void residual volume assists with diagnosis: • the absence of a post-void residual volume of over 100ml, essentially excludes a diagnosis of CES, with a negative predictive value of 99.99%

  20. Imaging • Plain films • MRI imaging of the entire spine

  21. Treatment • Neurosurgical consultation • High dose systemic corticosteroids • Emergent surgical decompression

  22. Case #3 • Pt is a professional football player, wide receiver, who presents to with wrist pain. He describes a FOOSH mechanism of injury and complains of numbness in the distribution of the median nerve.

  23. Perilunate Injury

  24. Epidemiology • Wrist injuries account for 2.5% of all ED visits. • Lunate and perilunate injuries are thought to represent 10% of all carpal injuries.

  25. Clinical Anatomy • There are 8 carpal bones comprising two carpal rows; the scaphoid bridges both rows. • With radial deviation the scaphoid and lunate palmar flex • Intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments maintain carpal stability.

  26. Mechanism of Injury • Perilunate and lunate dislocations result from hyperextension injuries. • Most common mechanism of injury is a FOOSH, followed by an MVA. • Progressive Injuries: • Stage I: scapholunate dissociation • Stage II: perilunate dislocation • Stage III: dislocation of the triquetrem • Stage IV: lunate dislocation

  27. Clinical Presentation • History of high energy mechanism of hyperextension • Palpable pain over the dorsum of the wrist • Tenderness distal to Lister’s tubercle in the area of the scapholunate ligament

  28. Diagnosis • High index of suspicion • Palpation over the dorsum of the wrist • Watson Click Test • Radiographs

  29. Imaging • PA and lateral radiographs • PA view: • constant 2 mm intercarpal joint space • 3 arcs • Lateral view: • four Cs • capitolunate angle 0-15 degrees • scapholunate 30-60 degrees • Stress views

  30. Treatment • Consultation with a hand surgeon to discuss management

  31. Case #4 • Pt is a 23 y/o active duty special operations soldier who presents with persistent dorsal foot pain. He stepped in a hole over a week ago, and has not improved with self-care.

  32. Lisfranc Fracture

  33. Epidemiology • The articulation between the tarsal and metatarsal bones in the foot is named after Jaques Lisfranc, a field surgeon in Napoleon's Army. • Lisfranc injuries may represent 1% of all orthopedic trauma, but 20% are missed on initial presentation.

  34. Clinical anatomy • The second metatarsal is the keystone to the Lisfranc joint. • Transverse ligaments join the metatarsals, excluding the first and second. • Soft tissue support is abundant on the plantar surface, leaving the dorsal surface relatively vulnerable.

  35. Mechanism of Injury • Lisfranc injuries are caused by either direct or indirect trauma. • Indirect injuries account for the majority of injuries: either a rotational force to the forefoot, or axial loading on a plantar flexed, fixed foot. • Common source of trauma: falls from a height; motor vehicle accidents; equestrian and athletic injuries.

  36. Clinical Presentation • Presentation varies from a mild undetectable subluxation to an obvious fracture dislocation • Midfoot pain, swelling and difficulty bearing weight are clinical clues • Pain with passive pronation and abduction of the forefoot with the hindfoot supported • Tense swelling may indicate a CS.

  37. Diagnosis • High index of suspicion in ankle and foot injuries • Proper radiographic interpretation

  38. Imaging • AP, lateral and oblique views • On AP and obliques the 2nd met medial border should align with the middle cuneiform • On the lateral the metatarsal shaft should not be more dorsal than the respective tarsal bone • Contralateral foot films • Weight-bearing views

  39. Treatment • Orthopedic consultation for possible ORIF • Identify and manage compartment syndrome

  40. Case #5 • Pt is an 18 y/o football player who presents with an ankle sprain. • Pt has considerable swelling and demonstrates more tenderness proximal to the ATFL in the area of the AITF ligament. • Radiographs are negative for fracture.

  41. Syndesmotic Ankle Sprain

  42. Epidemiology • Ankle sprains are the most common lower extremity injury in sports medicine, and constitute 25% of all sports injuries. • In one series, syndesmotic injuries constituted 17 % of ankle sprains. • Syndesmotic injuries result in longer periods of disability than standard lateral ankle sprains. • Syndesmotic injuries are not uncommonly associated with fractures.

  43. Clinical Anatomy • The syndesmotic ligaments maintain stability between the distal tibia and fibula • Anterior tibiofibular ligament • Posterior tibiofibular ligament • Transverse tibiofibular ligament • interosseous ligament • interosseous membrane

  44. Mechanism of Injury • Injuries to the syndesmosis occur as a result of a forced external rotation of the foot, or during internal rotation of the tibia on a planted foot. • Common in soccer, skiing, motocross and football. • Syndesmosis injuries are commonly associated with ankle fractures (Weber B &C) and deltoid ligament ruptures.

  45. Clinical Presentation • Usually the patient cannot put weight upon the leg. • Pain is located anteriorly along the syndesmosis. • Active movement of external rotation of the foot is painful. • Positive Squeeze Test • Positive External Rotation Stress Test

  46. Diagnosis • Clinical diagnosis • mechanism of injury • correlative physical examination • Radiographic imaging assists in risk stratifying

  47. Imaging • Ottawa Ankle Rules: AP, lateral and mortise views should be obtained: • tenderness over the lateral and medial malleolus • unable to bear weight for four steps immediately or in the ED • Syndesmosis Radiographic Criterion • Mortise: medial clear space > 4mm • AP: tibiofibular overlap < 10 mm

  48. Treatment • Ligamentous injuries without fracture or gross widening can be treated conservatively • Fractures or radiographic evidence of syndesmotic widening warrant orthopedic consultation for operative repair.

  49. Case #6 • Pt is a 35 y/o physician/mother who while running up the stairs, noted a painful pop involving the lateral foot. • On palpation, she has considerable tenderness over the proximal fifth metatarsal.

More Related