190 likes | 212 Views
This discussion explores the fidelity of Quantum Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) in comparison to Classical ARQ protocols, focusing on error detection and correction using Quantum codes. The presentation delves into the asymptotic and finite-length cases of Quantum ARQ, considering Quantum Enumerators and the Steane code among others. It highlights the probability distributions, error correction capabilities, and optimal encoding for different Quantum codes, emphasizing the theoretical bounds and thresholds. The talk concludes with essential theorems and practical implications for Quantum ARQ efficiency.
E N D
Fidelity of a Quantum ARQ Protocol • Classical Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) Protocol • Quantum Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) Protocol • Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol • Quantum Codes of Finite Lengths • The asymptotical Case (the code length ) Alexei Ashikhmin Bell Labs
Binary Symmetric Channel Classical ARQ Protocol • is a classical linear code • If is a parity check matrix of then for any • Compute syndrome • If we detect an error • If , but we have an undetected error
Binary Symmetric Channel Classical ARQ Protocol • Syndrome • is the distance distribution of • is the channel bit error probability • The probability of undetected error is equal to for good codes of any rate we have as • If , but we have an undetected error
Binary Symmetric Channel Classical ARQ Protocol • Syndrome • is the distance distribution of • The conditional probability of undetected error • For the best code of rate as • If there exists a linear code s. t. • If , but we have an undetected error
In this talk all complex vectors are assumed to be • normalized, i.e. • All normalization factors are omitted to make notation short
Quantum Errors Depolarizing Channel Depolarizing Channel
ARQ protocol: • We transmit a code state • Receive • Measure with respect to and • If the result of the measurement belongs to we ask to repeat transmission • Otherwise we use The fidelity is the average value of Quantum ARQ Protocol If is close to 1 we can use
Quantum Enumerators is a code with the orthogonal projector P. Shor and R. Laflamme (1996):
Quantum Enumerators • and are connected by quaternary MacWilliams identities • where are quaternary Krawtchouk polynomials: • The dimension of is • is the smallest integer s. t. then can correct any • errors
Quantum Enumerators • In many cases are known or can be accurately estimated (especially for quantum stabilizer codes) • For example, the Steane code (encodes 1 qubit into 7 qubits): • and therefore this code can correct any single ( since ) error
Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol Recall that the probability that is projected on is equal to The fidelity is the average value of is the projection onto and Theorem
Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol Quantum Codes of Finite Lengths We can numerically compute upper and lower bounds on , (recall that )
Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol For the Steane code that encodes 1 qubit into 7 qubits we have
Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol LemmaThe probability that will be projected onto equals Hence we can consider as a function of
Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol • Let be the known optimal code encoding 1 qubit into 5 qubits • Let be a “silly” code that encodes 1 qubit into 5 qubits defined by the generator matrix: • is not optimal at all
(if Q encodes qubits into qubits its rate is ) Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol The Asymptotic Case Theorem ( threshold behavior ) • Asymptotically, as , we have for • If then there exists a stabilizer code s.t. Theorem (the error exponent)For we have
Existence bound Fidelity of Quantum ARQ Protocol Theorem (Ashikhmin, Litsyn, 1999) There exists a quantum stabilizer code Q with the binomial quantum enumerators: Substitution of these into gives the existence bound on Upper bound is more tedious