210 likes | 226 Views
Editing. Commenting. Translation Tool. Browsing. Print Generation. Public Commenting. Peer Review. Linearization Generation. Public Proposals. Public Scoring Mini questionnaires. Public Commenting . Open to public Comments attachable to concepts or property values Allows threads
E N D
Editing Commenting Translation Tool Browsing Print Generation Public Commenting Peer Review Linearization Generation Public Proposals Public Scoring Mini questionnaires
Public Commenting • Open to public • Comments attachable to concepts or property values • Allows threads • Keeps track of changes of the content that it is attached to. • Supports moderation of comments
Public Scoring • Allows the public to give scores on individual property values. (i.e. descriptions, synonyms, etc.) • Similar to stars or up vote / down vote mechanisms used in various sites.
Public Mini Questionnaires Is this category in the right place? Yes No • Is the definition clearly formulated • 1 Very Clear • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 Not clear at all
Proposal Mechanism • Allows public to propose changes in the classification • Content of individual concepts. • Classification hierarchy (structural changes) • Proposal can be attached to concepts at any level in the classification. • There may be multiple proposals attached to one ICD concept. Users of the tool generate proposals Feedback / filter by web of trust TAG ME applies changes
Proposals for Structural Changes • This type of proposals involves changes in the classification hierarchy mainly by splitting or moving concepts. • These proposals will include a text explaining the changes together with some additional structured content about the proposal. • These proposals can be attached to multiple ICD concepts.
Content Proposals • The actual proposal will be done by editing a clone of the ICD11 concept • A proposal might suggest changes to one or more of the content model parameters • It may be as simple as suggesting a synonym • Or it might have a several of the content model parameters filled in including the ones bound to a value set.
Peer Reviewing - 1 Request review • The tool will keep a pool of Reviewers • The TAG Managing Editor will be in charge of sending the content to reviewers when it’s ready. • The tool will provide a mechanism to select the unit to be reviewed together with reviewer(s) from the pool to start the process. • The tool will automatically notify the reviewer with a hyperlink to a web form that he/she will use for the review Tag managing editor Reviewer Send review
Peer Reviewing – 2 • Review of the foundation and linearization hierarchy • The unit of review in this case will be a sub-tree of a linearization. • Reviewers of this type for the linearizations will be mainly horizontal TAGs (MTAG, MbTAG and their work groups) • The review will be done by filling a template form. • Review of concept content • The unit of review in this case will be one concept • Reviewers will be domain experts. • The review will be done by filling a template form
Translation Tool • Allows translation of ICD-11 content • Uses a translation memory filled with pre-existing translations of ICD-10 • To support the translation workflow
Editing Commenting Translation Tool Browsing Print Generation Public Commenting Peer Review Public Scoring Mini questionnaires Linearization Generation Public Proposals
WHO Stanford Public Platform ? Public Commenting Browsing iCat Scoring Mini Questionnaire Linearization Generation Persisted objects Print Generation Peer Review iCatdb dump Loader Public Proposals
Proposal Processing at the iCat • After the some of the proposal items are accepted the platform would expose the following information in a web service • iCat periodically checks this service and applies the changes.