1 / 13

Example: Outokumpu

Tornio. Example: Outokumpu. Terneuzen. Milano. Example: Nike. Amsterdam. Rotterdam. Antwerpen. Laakdal. Zeebrugge. Hamina. Example: Nike outbound. Moskou. Antwerpen. Laakdal. Oradea. Example: Ford. Killingholme. Dartford. Vlissingen. Purfleet. Genk. Keulen. Saarlouis.

sclement
Download Presentation

Example: Outokumpu

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tornio Example: Outokumpu Terneuzen Milano

  2. Example: Nike Amsterdam Rotterdam Antwerpen Laakdal Zeebrugge

  3. Hamina Example: Nike outbound Moskou Antwerpen Laakdal Oradea

  4. Example: Ford Killingholme Dartford Vlissingen Purfleet Genk Keulen Saarlouis

  5. Rail shuttles Departures per week • Germany 101 • Italy 47 • Austria 34 • Tsjech Republic 24 • Switzerland 13 • Belgium 12 • Poland 10

  6. Intermodal shortsea Departures per weekmain destinations Cont. RoRo • Ireland 25 1 • Russia 22 3 • Spain 20 2 • UK 58 14 (per day)

  7. Rotterdam Shortsea terminals Eemhaven ECT Home Terminal Rail Service Centre

  8. Case Netherlands - Italy • Shortsea (29%*) • 9 container and 2 Ro-Ro services • 11 resp. 1 sailings per week • Shortsea cheaper south of Rome • Transit time longer than by road or rail • Rail (27%*) • 9 container services, 64 departures per week • Transit time and price compatetive with road transport (Alps passage, driving hours, ban on weekend driving, Maut in Germany and Austria) • Mainly intermodal transport to northern Italy * Share in modal split; roadtransport = 44%

  9. DIRETTRICE GOTTARDO 1 Certosa Cemat 2 Certosa ONT 3 Greco Hupac 4 Rogoredo Cemat 5 Smist. Messina 6 Smist. Mara 7 Smist. Cemat 8 Greco Hupac 9 Pioltello Saima DIRETTRICE SEMPIONE Rail terminals rond Milaan LUINO-Norfolkline ARCISATE MENDRISIO CO VA SESTO C. BG GALLARATE-Ambrogio BUSTO-Hupac DESIO-Hupac MXP BRESCIA - Net MONZA RHO-Sogemar 1 TREVIGLIO 2 8 6 MELZO-Com Sogemar ARLUNO- Spinelli 7 9 TORINO 3 5 VERONA NO 4 TAVAZZANO-Chem T. MORTARA PV CASALPUST. CR GENOVA POTENZIAMENTO TRAFFICO PASSEGGERI (LP e SFR) BOLOGNA

  10. Issues • When to use shortsea or rail from Italy to Northern Europe? • Competitive position of ports • transit time by sea

  11. Case Netherlands - Russia • Shortsea to Russia (Baltic ports) • 19 container and 2 Ro-Ro services • 20 / 4 sailings per week • Shortsea least expensive modality • Transit time (slightly) longer than road and rail • Rail • Limited volume to Russia • Mainly project cargo (machinery) • Different rail gauge, transhipment Malaszewice

  12. Issues • In future one type of liability vs CIM/SMGS • Ports, maily St Petersburg (were) often congested • Growth use of trans-siberian route • Railferry Sassnitz-Klaipeda: most5 westerly station of the trans-siberian express. (slightly)

  13. More information? Rail Cargo information Netherlands info@railcargo.nl www.railcargo.nl Shortsea Promotion Centre Holland shortsea@shortsea.nl www.shortsea.nl

More Related