1 / 21

Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin

Alabama Water Resources Conference. September 6, 2012. Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin. A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of the Weiss Lake TMDL. Introduction – North Georgia Water Resources Partnership. Drought Years of the late 1990s Highlighted Need for:

scot
Download Presentation

Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 Nutrient Trading Frameworkin the Coosa Basin A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of the Weiss Lake TMDL

  2. Introduction – North Georgia Water Resources Partnership • Drought Years of the late 1990s Highlighted Need for: • Regional Planning • Integrated Planning for Water Supply, Wastewater Treatment, and Stormwater Management Since 2000 the Partnership has been: • Diverse – Comprised of water with-drawal permit holders, local governments, and other advocacy entities with interest in water issues • Collaborative – Formed voluntarily, membership by choice • Largely self-funded • River Basin Centered - Geographic boundaries nearly coincide with the Coosa Basin Brown and Caldwell

  3. Focus Area - Coosa River Basin to Weiss Lake • The Coosa Basin to Weiss Lake • Drainage area over 5,200 square miles • Majority of the watershed in Georgia Brown and Caldwell Source: USEPA 2008

  4. Background • Lake Weiss TMDL completed in 2008 • In order to meet Alabama Chlorophyll a standards, total phosphorus (TP) reduction targets set • 30% phosphorus load reduction goal at the Georgia/Alabama state line. • GAEPD considering TP permit limits for NPDES discharges of 1.0 mg/L (major) and 8.34 lbs/day (minor) • Georgia can meet 30% TP reduction “in any number of ways” (point and/or non-point measures) • The TMDL acknowledges that non-point sources are major contributors to the phosphorus loading Brown and Caldwell

  5. Model Results for Existing Conditions • Growing Season Median TP Loads to Weiss Lake Non-Point Sources 2,280 kg/day 71% Source: USEPA Weiss Lake TMDL (2008) Brown and Caldwell

  6. What is Water Quality Trading? • An approach to meet water quality standards in a more efficient method. • Based on the fact that sources in a watershed can face very different costs to control the same pollutant. • Trading programs allow facilities facing higher pollution control costs to meet their regulatory obligations by purchasing environmentally equivalent pollution reductions from another source at lower cost • Thus achieving the same water quality improvement at lower overall cost • A credit is a tradable unit of pollutant reduction (i.e. pound of TP) Brown and Caldwell

  7. Water Quality Trading Programs • Programs in the US (as tracked by EPA) • 48 with at least one trade • Includes a range parameters and trading frameworks Source: USEPA Brown and Caldwell

  8. Coosa Basin Tasks • Identify and Evaluate potential Nutrient Trading Frameworks • Evaluate Existing Phosphorus Loads within the Coosa River Basin • Identify and Evaluate Alternatives/Reduction Strategies • Set Up Pilot Point to Non-Point Trade Brown and Caldwell

  9. Key Framework Considerations • Type of Trading • NPDES Approach • Administration • Trading Factors Brown and Caldwell

  10. Types of Trading Point Source – Point Source • One point source to one point source trading • Multiple facility point source trading • Point Source Exchange Credits Multiple Facilities One to one trading Brown and Caldwell

  11. Types of TradingPoint Source – Non-point Source • One point source to one non-point source trade • One point source to multiple non-point source trades • Non-point source credit exchange Credit Exchange One to one trading Brown and Caldwell

  12. NPDES Approach • Individual Permit – trades would generally be executed through contracts between trading parties, and then documented in NPDES permits • Watershed Permit - A similar alternative is the issuance of a group NPDES permit (or “general watershed permit”) that represents the aggregate wasteload allocation (WLA) for all participating sources. Typically, a point source can attain compliance by staying under its individual WLA or purchasing credits under the general watershed permit. Brown and Caldwell | Footer | Date

  13. Administration • Agreement between individual parties – trades arranged through direct negotiation between buying and selling sources • Credit exchange – administered by: • a coalition of dischargers • the state • private third-party broker Brown and Caldwell | Footer | Date

  14. Trading Factors • The factors modify the rate from something other than a one-to-one ratio between credits needed at point A and reductions achieved at point B. • Generally, the magnitudes for different locations within the watersheds estimated from models. • Many trading frameworks have included the use of factors to adjust the credit exchange rate. Example of USGS SPARROW Model Phosphorus delivery for the Flint River in Northern Alabama Brown and Caldwell | Footer | Date

  15. Proposed Coosa BasinNutrient Trading Framework Elements • Type of Trading • Point Source – Non-point source • NPDES Approach • Individual Permit • Administration • Individual Negotiations • Trading Factor • Proposed 1:1 ratio Brown and Caldwell

  16. Trading Guidance • Definition of the units of trade. • Definition of the manner in which credits would be calculated for point and nonpoint source load reduction projects. • A procedure for verifying BMPs or nutrient load reductions. • Templates for trading agreements between parties • Common language for incorporation into NPDES permits. Brown and Caldwell

  17. Evaluate Phosphorus Loads • This step is currently underway • Gathering available models and studies to understand phosphorus loads • Identify high phosphorus load subwatersheds • Identify potential point source partners • Identify potential non-point source partners Brown and Caldwell | Footer | Date

  18. Identify and Evaluate Alternatives and Pilot Trade • Identify potential point to non-point source trade • Identify BMPs to reduce TP (type, size, number) • Identify potential sites for BMP implementation • Conduct site visit of potential BMP sites • Develop concept plan for BMP Lower Boise Wetland Concept Brown and Caldwell

  19. Summary • Nutrient Trading is a cost effective solution for meeting water quality requirements that is supported by the EPA and Georgia EPD. • The North Georgia Water Resources Partnership is currently investigating the feasibility of developing a nutrient trading framework and pilot trade for the Coosa Basin. Brown and Caldwell

  20. Questions? Brown and Caldwell | Footer | Date

  21. Questions? Acknowledgements: • North Georgia Water Resources Partnership • Laurie Hawks and Clifton Bell, Brown and Caldwell

More Related