220 likes | 330 Views
Working with Judicial Decisions Part One by Annette Demers BA LLB MLIS. Judicial Decisions. What Database?. Health Services and Support -- Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27, [2007] 2 SCR 391. Refresher. Choose the right system.
E N D
Working with Judicial Decisions Part Oneby Annette Demers BA LLB MLIS Judicial Decisions
What Database? Health Services and Support -- Facilities SubsectorBargaining Assn. v British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27, [2007] 2 SCR 391.
Refresher Choose the right system. Choose the right database within the system. Judicial Decisions
Refresher • Review your problemfor: • Specifics; Judicial Decisions
Specifics –Full Cite Health Services and Support -- Facilities SubsectorBargaining Assn. v British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27, [2007] 2 SCR 391.
Specifics -Partial Has Carol McDermott (who is a lawyer at Legal Assistance of Windsor) ever argued a case before the Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board?
You Try It! Locate this case: Style of Cause: BP Canada Energy Group ULC (Re) Date: 2011 Tribunal: Ontario Energy Board
You Try It! Locate this case: Citation: 2011 CFSRB 37 Tribunal: Ontario - Child and Family Services Review Board
You Try It! Locate this case: Citation: Ruling No. 10-01-1237 Tribunal: Ontario Building Code Commission
Use Secondary Sources If asked to research on a topic, first try: a. Dictionary b. Encyclopedia c. Textbook or looseleaf d. Journal article Judicial Decisions
Use Secondary Sources Can a person’s Facebook profile be used as evidence in court? Locate 1 relevant case which answers this question. Hint: Search Halsbury’s on QL for help.
Unique Terms Are there any cases where the Chinese cultural custom of filial piety was considered in an award for damages for personal injury?
Key Legal Issues The client has complained that she was denied a job due to racism.
Key Legal Issues The client has complained of discrimination on the basis of race in an application for employment.
Synonyms accomplice accessory co-conspirator abettor
Try it! Use Quicklaw to locate this 1989 Supreme Court case: “Irwin Toy”
Try it! Does the contract principle of “caveat emptor” (buyer beware) still apply in cases where the seller engaged in fraudulent misrepresentation?
Try it! “caveat emptor” /s “fraudulent misrepresentation”
THANK YOU! Annette Demers ademers@uwindsor.ca http://www.uwindsor.ca/law/library Judicial Decisions