120 likes | 283 Views
Review of Scrutiny Activity 2004 – 2006, Scrutiny Protocol and the Scrutiny Programme 2006-2009. Ian Munro Chair of the Scrutiny Panel. Presentation Overview. Scrutiny activity Engagement and participation Review outcomes and impact Independent review of scrutiny
E N D
Review of Scrutiny Activity 2004 – 2006, Scrutiny Protocol and the Scrutiny Programme 2006-2009 Ian Munro Chair of the Scrutiny Panel
Presentation Overview • Scrutiny activity • Engagement and participation • Review outcomes and impact • Independent review of scrutiny • Changes to scrutiny protocol • Scrutiny forward plan
Scrutiny Activity 2004 -2006 Topics examined by the Scrutiny Panel: Broadband Business development Tourism Sustainable energy
Regional Strategic Review – wider engagement • Interviews • Focus groups • Academics and experts • Senior professionals and practitioners
BroadbandRegional Strategic Review • Outcomes and Impact • Recommendations on the strategic development and policies surrounding the application of broadband technologies • Addressing issues of social exclusion, skills, spatial planning and business competitiveness • Partnership arrangements in the public sector for the roll-out of technologies
Business Development Regional Strategic Review • Outcomes and Impact • Raised profile for business development and related issues • Influenced Government policy at a critical stage for departments and in light of an increasing role for SWRDA • Improved clarity and vision on plans for business development in the region.
TourismRegional Strategic Review • Outcomes and Impact • Recommendations to reduce fragmentation of support and duplication of effort • Value for money through coordinated effort • Better understanding of the split responsibility for tourism • Greater ownership and endorsement of the Towards 2015 Tourism Strategy
Independent review – How well are we doing? • Arup and partners conducted independent review of SWRA scrutiny activity focused on: • Improving the overall approach • Ensuring adequate resources • Exploring wider engagement of regional players • Arup reported that when compared nationally SWRA had: • Made significant progress in collaborative working • Pioneered the Scrutiny Protocol approach • Engaged stakeholders innovatively • Successfully used different techniques for gathering evidence
Independent review – What could we improve? • Arup recommended that reviews should: • Engage and not scrutinise regional partners • Focus primarily on connecting regional issues and agendas • Involvement/engagement of the SWRDA Board • Be flexible in the forward plan for topic selection • Produce distinctive reports which reflect the evidence gathered during the review process
Independent review – How we will improve • Improvements to the scrutiny protocol: • Clarity on how scrutiny relates to other SWRDA monitoring and evaluation activity • Improvements in the process for following up scrutiny recommendations and reports • Appointment of a lead SWRDA Board member for scrutiny • Flexibility in the identification and timing of topics for review
Scrutiny Forward Plan 2006 -2009 • Next review topic: • Quality of Employment Opportunity • Topics in reserve include: • Transport • Cities and Regions • ….and will be flexible, responsive and timely as the region requires