250 likes | 271 Views
Chapter 7. Efficiency and Exchange. Efficiency. Pareto Efficiency No change is possible that will help some people without harming others It is not possible to make some people better-off without harming others Inefficiency: It is possible to help some people without harming others.
E N D
Chapter 7 Efficiency and Exchange
Efficiency • Pareto Efficiency • No change is possible that will help some people without harming others • It is not possible to make some people better-off without harming others • Inefficiency: • It is possible to help some people without harming others
A market equilibrium is efficient • if price and quantity take any other than values different from the values in equilibrium, some people can be better- off by having more or less transactions without harming others • If away from equilibrium, some people can be better-off without harming others by moving toward equilibrium
Recall: Consumer Surplus • the net gain to an individual buyer from the purchase of a good. • the difference between the buyer’s willingness to pay and the price paid.
Consumer Surplus The total consumer surplus generated by purchases of a good at a given price is equal to the area below the demand curve but above that price.
Producer Surplus • the net gain to a seller from selling a good • the difference between the price received and the minimum price the producer is willing to accept
Producer Surplus The total producer surplus from sales of a good at a given price is the area above the supply curve but below that price.
Total Surplus • the total net gain to consumers and producers from trading in the market • the sum of the producer surplus and the consumer surplus
Total Surplus Pf Pc
Observations on Efficiency • When price is above or below the equilibrium, the quantity exchanged will be below the equilibrium. • The vertical value on the demand curve (marginal benefit) is greater than the vertical value on the supply curve (MC). • Only the equilibrium will maximize economic surplus.
Consumer surplus = $900/day S Producer surplus = $900/day D Economic Surplus in an Unregulated Market for Home Heating Oil Figure 7.4, P. 196 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 • Without price controls: • Equilibrium Price = $1.40 • Consumer surplus = (1/2)(3,000)(.60) = $900/day • Producer surplus = (1/2)(3,000)(.6) = 900/day • Economic surplus = $1,800/day Price ($/gallon) .80 1 2 3 4 5 8 Quantity (1,000s of gallons/day)
Consumer surplus = $900/day Lost economic surplus = $800/day Producer surplus = $100/day The Waste Caused by Price Controls Price Ceiling set at $1.00 S 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 D Price ($/gallon) .80 • With price controls: • Producer surplus = (1/2)(1,000)(.20) = $100/day or a loss of $800/day • Economic surplus = $1,000 or a loss of $800/day Figure 7.5, P. 197 1 2 3 4 5 8 Quantity (1,000s of gallons/day)
Consumer surplus = $9,000/month Reduction in total economic surplus = $1,000,000/month S Domestic price with subsidy D The Reduction in EconomicSurplus from a Subsidy • The cost of the tax = $6 million • The benefit of the subsidy = $5 million • Loss of economic surplus = $1 million 5.00 4.00 Price of bread ($/loaf) 3.00 2.00 World price = $ 1.00 Figure 7.8, P.200 2 4 6 8 Quantity (millions of loaves/month
Market Equilibrium and Efficiency • Markets will be efficient when: • Buyers and sellers are well informed. • Markets are perfectly competitive. • Supply measures all relevant costs. • Demand measures all relevant benefits. • Government intervention needed when market failure
Market Equilibrium and Efficiency • What do you think? • Is efficiency the only goal? • Why should efficiency be the first goal?
Without a tax P = $3/lb and Q = 3 million lbs/month S + tax S • With a tax of $1/lb • MC increases by $1/lb • Supply shifts up by $1 • P = $3.50; Q = 2.5 million • Consumers and producers share the burden of the tax equally • Producers receive $2.50/lb • Consumers pay $3.50/lb 3.50 3 2.50 D 2.5 The Effect of a Tax on the Equilibrium Quantity and Price of Avocados 6 5 4 Price ($/pound) 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 Quantity (millions of pounds/month)
S + $100 $20,100 S $20,000 • Supply shifts to $20,100 • The burden of the tax falls entirely on the consumer D 1.9 2.0 The Effect of a Tax on Sellers of a Good with Infinite Price Elasticity of Supply Assume a tax levy of $100 tax/car Price ($/car) Quantity (millions of cars/month)
Taxes and Efficiency • Who Pays a Tax? • When supply is perfectly elastic, the tax burden will fall entirely on the consumer.
S Total economic surplus = $9 million/month How a tax collected for a seller affects economic surplus D The Market for Avocados Without Taxes 6 5 4 Price ($/pound) 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 Quantity (millions of pounds/month)
S + tax S 6 5 How a tax collected from a seller affects economic surplus 4 3.50 Price ($/pound) 3 2.50 2 1 D 1 2 3 4 5 2.5 Quantity (millions of pounds/month) The Effect of a $1 perPound Tax on Avocados
Taxes and Efficiency • Deadweight Loss • The reduction in total economic surplus that results from the adoption of a policy
S + tax Deadweight loss caused by tax 3.50 2.50 2.5 The Deadweight Loss Caused by a Tax S 6 5 4 Price ($/pound) 3 2 1 D 1 2 3 4 5 Quantity (millions of pounds/month)
Deadweight loss Deadweight loss S + T S + T 2.60 S S 2.40 2.00 2.00 1.60 1.40 D1 D2 19 24 21 24 Elasticity of Demand and the Deadweight Loss from a Tax Price ($/unit) Price ($/unit) Quantity (units/day) Quantity (units/day) The greater the elasticity of demand, the greater the deadweight loss from a tax
Deadweight Loss Deadweight Loss S2 + T S1 + T S2 2.65 S1 2.35 2.00 2.00 1.65 1.35 D D 57 72 63 72 Elasticity of Supply and the Deadweight Loss from a Tax Price ($/unit) Price ($/unit) Quantity (units/day) Quantity (units/day) The greater the elasticity of supply, the greater the deadweight loss from a tax
Taxes and Efficiency • What do you think? • Why would a tax on land be efficient? • Would a tax on pollution increase economic surplus?