1 / 49

RADAR: Dataflow Analysis for Concurrent Programs using Datarace Detection

This study explores the importance of studying concurrency, tackling architectural trends and bugs with our sequential and concurrent dataflow analysis approach, showcasing RADAR's results and its application in examples. Learn about our modular framework for race detection and optimizations. Leverage our approach to enhance concurrent analysis and optimize race-free scenarios for improved program efficiency. Dive into the intricacies of non-null and constant analysis under RADAR to ensure safer and more scalable code. Stay ahead in the ever-evolving landscape of concurrency with RADAR.

seckert
Download Presentation

RADAR: Dataflow Analysis for Concurrent Programs using Datarace Detection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RADAR: Dataflow Analysis for Concurrent Programs using Datarace Detection Ravi Chugh, Jan Voung, Ranjit Jhala, Sorin Lerner {rchugh, jvoung, jhala, lerner} @ cs.ucsd.edu UC San Diego

  2. Studying Concurrency is Important

  3. Studying Concurrency is Important

  4. Studying Concurrency is Important

  5. Studying Concurrency is Important • A “counting argument” • > wget http://pldi2008.cs.ucr.edu/program_schedule.html • > grep –i “concurr” program_schedule.html | wc –l • 6

  6. All Jokes Aside… Architectural Trends Pressing Issue Devilish Bugs

  7. Our Approach Leverage sequential work Sequential Dataflow Analysis Concurrent Dataflow Analysis

  8. Sequential Reasoning is Incorrect p = new_or_die(); p != null x = compute(); p != null *p = x; if (p != null) { use(p); p = null; }

  9. Sequential Optimization is Incorrect flag = 0; while (flag == 0) { /* spin */ } use(g); Constant propagation would be incorrect g = compute(); flag = 1; 0 • Compilers forced to be conservative • Optimization opportunities missed

  10. Our Approach Concurrent Dataflow Analysis RADAR Sequential Dataflow Analysis

  11. Our Approach Sequential Dataflow Analysis Concurrent Dataflow Analysis RADAR Concurrency Analysis Race Detector

  12. Modular Framework Sequential Non-Null Analysis Sequential Constant Analysis Sequential Dataflow Analysis Concurrent Dataflow Analysis Concurrent Non-Null Analysis Concurrent Constant Analysis RADAR Race Detector

  13. Modular Framework Sequential Constant Analysis RADAR Concurrent Constant Analysis Race Detector precise scalable

  14. RADAR: Results • Concurrent non-null analysis • Scales to: • Apache (~130 KLOC) • OpenSSL (~210 KLOC) • subset of Linux kernel (~830 KLOC)

  15. Example with Locks lock(l); p = new_or_die(); x = compute(); *p = x; unlock(l); lock(l); if (p != null) { use(p); p = null; } unlock(l);

  16. Can this be Optimized? lock(l); p = new_or_die(); unlock(l); x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); lock(l); if (p != null) { use(p); p = null; } unlock(l);

  17. Optimized Version is Race-free lock(l); p = new_or_die(); unlock(l); x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); lock(l); if (p != null) { use(p); p = null; } unlock(l);

  18. Oops… lock(l); p = new_or_die(); unlock(l); x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); lock(l); if (p != null) { use(p); p = null; } unlock(l);

  19. Sequential Non-Null Analysis lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); p != null lock(l); p != null *p = x; p != null unlock(l); lock(l); if (p != null) { p != null use(p); p != null p = null; p != null } unlock(l);

  20. RADAR on Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); p != null lock(l); p != null *p = x; p != null unlock(l); lock(l); if (p != null) { p != null use(p); p != null p = null; p != null } unlock(l);

  21. RADAR on Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); Can fact be invalidated by concurrent thread? Can p be written by a concurrent thread?

  22. RADAR on Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); Race Detector No Race pseudo-read(p) Race Can p be written by a concurrent thread?

  23. RADAR on Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); Race Detector No Race pseudo-read(p) Race Can p be written by a concurrent thread?

  24. RADAR on Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); Race Detector No Race Race pseudo-read(p)

  25. RADAR on Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); p != null lock(l); p != null *p = x; unlock(l); UNSAFE

  26. RADAR on Safe Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null x = compute(); *p = x; unlock(l); Race Detector No Race pseudo-read(p) Race

  27. RADAR on Safe Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null x = compute(); p != null *p = x; unlock(l); Race Detector No Race Race pseudo-read(p)

  28. RADAR on Safe Example lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null x = compute(); p != null *p = x; unlock(l); SAFE

  29. More on RADAR • Round trip queries to race detector • Inter-procedural analysis

  30. (1) Round-trip Queries lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); p != null lock(l); p != null *p = x; p != null unlock(l); Race Detector No Race pseudo-read(p) Race Possible Race pseudo-read(p) Allow sequential analysis to run Get superset of (concurrent) facts

  31. (1) Round-trip Queries lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); p != null lock(l); p != null *p = x; p != null unlock(l); Insert all pseudo-reads at once pseudo-read(p) Race Detector pseudo-read(p) pseudo-read(p) pseudo-read(p) Send whole program to race detector pseudo-read(p)

  32. (1) Round-trip Queries lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); p != null lock(l); p != null *p = x; p != null unlock(l); pseudo-read(p) Get results back from Race Detector pseudo-read(p) pseudo-read(p) pseudo-read(p) pseudo-read(p)

  33. (1) Round-trip Queries lock(l); p = new_or_die(); unlock(l); x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); pseudo-read(p) Get results back from Race Detector pseudo-read(p) pseudo-read(p) Rerun analysis using race results pseudo-read(p) pseudo-read(p)

  34. (1) Round-trip Queries lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); lock(l); *p = x; unlock(l); Rerun analysis using race results

  35. (1) Round-trip Queries lock(l); p = new_or_die(); p != null unlock(l); p != null x = compute(); p != null lock(l); p != null *p = x; unlock(l); UNSAFE

  36. (2) Handling Procedures void foo() { if (*) { unlock(l); compute(); lock(l); } } lock(l); if (p != null) { foo(); *p = 10; } unlock(l); lock(l); p = null; unlock(l); Unlock in foo allows interference Want to summarize effect of calling foo

  37. (2) Handling Procedures void foo() { if (*) { unlock(l); compute(); lock(l); } } lock(l); if (p != null) { foo(); *p = 10; } unlock(l); lock(l); p = null; unlock(l);

  38. (2) Handling Procedures lock(l); if (p != null) { foo(); *p = 10; } unlock(l); pseudo-unlock(l); pseudo-read(p); pseudo-lock(l); • In the caller, RADAR inserts: • pseudo-unlock for every unlock in foo • pseudo-reads

  39. Evaluation • Is RADAR scalable? • Is RADAR precise? • Where can we do better?

  40. Experiments: Benchmarks • Apache 2.2.6 (130 KLOC) • worker threads + modules (e.g., caches) • OpenSSL 0.9.8g (210 KLOC) • model a multi-threaded client • Linux 2.6.15 (830 KLOC) • subset from RELAY experiments

  41. Sequential Race Detector + = Non-Null Escapes ⇒ race Conservative Non-Null Non-Null Optimistic (sequential) Never race Non-Null

  42. GAP Sequential Race Detector + = Non-Null Escapes ⇒ race Conservative Shared ⇒ race Non-Null No locks ⇒race Non-Null Optimistic (sequential) Never race Non-Null

  43. Sequential Race Detector + = Non-Null Escapes ⇒ race Conservative Shared ⇒ race Non-Null No locks ⇒race Non-Null Optimistic (sequential) Never race Non-Null

  44. Sources of Imprecision • Alias analysis • affects sequential dataflow and race detection • Lockset-based race analysis • ignores fork, join, condition variables • RADAR framework • pseudo-read (for non-null fact) races with • “x = NonNullAddress;”

  45. Related Work • Programming-model-based approaches • [Knoop et al 96], [Grunwald et al 93], … • par-begin / par-end • handles introduction of facts between threads • Thread-modular • [Owicki et al 76], [Jones 83], [Flanagan et al 03], … • more precise (use environment assumption) • inference not as scalable

  46. Conclusion Sequential Dataflow Analysis RADAR Concurrent Dataflow Analysis Race Detector precise scalable

  47. THANKS!

  48. What is filtered for non-null? if (a->f != null) { b->f = null; deref(a->f); //filter if warned deref(b->f); //don’t filter }

More Related