1 / 13

Tax Options for Alaska: Distributional Implications of Major Alternatives October 5, 2002

Tax Options for Alaska: Distributional Implications of Major Alternatives October 5, 2002. Matt Gardner Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy 1311 L Street NW Washington, DC 20005 (202) 626-3780 www.itepnet.org. Evaluating Tax Equity.

selima
Download Presentation

Tax Options for Alaska: Distributional Implications of Major Alternatives October 5, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tax Options for Alaska: Distributional Implications of Major AlternativesOctober 5, 2002 Matt Gardner Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy 1311 L Street NW Washington, DC 20005 (202) 626-3780 www.itepnet.org

  2. Evaluating Tax Equity • Progressive tax: High income taxpayers pay a greater share of their income than do low income taxpayers. • Regressive tax: Low income taxpayers pay a greater share of their income than do high income taxpayers. • Proportional or “flat” tax: All taxpayers pay the same share of their income.

  3. Alaska taxes are regressive.

  4. What Makes State and Local Taxes Regressive? ITEP’s 1995 “Who Pays” study found that the most regressive tax systems tend to: + Rely heavily on sales and excise taxes. + Not impose a personal income tax + Impose an income tax, but at a low, flat rate. Conversely, the least regressive tax systems were those that: + Impose a progressive income tax. + Rely very little on sales and excise taxes.

  5. The Permanent Fund Dividend has its biggest impact, as a percentage of gross income, on the poorest Alaskans.

  6. A statewide sales tax would fall most heavily on low-income taxpayers.

  7. This is because low-income Alaskans spend a greater percentage of their income on items subject to the sales tax.

  8. Approaches to a Federal-Based Income Tax • + Adjusted Gross Income (FAGI). This approach links to the federal tax before exemptions and deductions are allowed, and before the tax rates are applied. • + Taxable Income (FTI). This approach links to the federal tax after exemptions and deductions are allowed, but before the tax rates are applied. • + Federal Tax. This approach links to the federal tax after exemptions and deductions are allowed, and after the tax rates are applied.

  9. Personal income taxes are among the most progressive taxes states can levy– but some income taxes are more progressive than others.

  10. Why Federal Deductibility Matters: Impact of a $300 Million “% of Federal” Tax Before and After Fed Offset

  11. The More Progressive the Income Tax, the Greater the “Federal Offset”

More Related