1 / 36

Carbon Taxation

Carbon Taxation. NEW CHAPTER. Environmental Taxes. Few would today dispute that humans are a part of the global warming problem - This is not the reason for the interest Our issue is how we create maximum CO2 reductions with least pain

selma
Download Presentation

Carbon Taxation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carbon Taxation

  2. NEW CHAPTER

  3. Environmental Taxes Few would today dispute that humans are a part of the global warming problem - This is not the reason for the interest Our issue is how we create maximum CO2 reductions with least pain Generally the idea is to allow society to function, GDP and growth to be maintained yet progressively lower CO2 emissions

  4. Is Tax Right Environmental taxes are unique - why? Taxes are not about stopping or curtailing behaviour Taxes are revenue raisers - at least in developed economies Only comparables are sin taxes – alcohol, tobacco and similar

  5. The Tax Theory The optimal tax should be set so that : Marginal environmental damage = Marginal economic benefit (MED = MEB) There fore MED = $50bn on car pollution may require another $1 / litre tax on fuel. But would create political problems In addition while social welfare may increase by reducing CO2 emissions GDP may drop – currently or any other time not easy to accept by societies

  6. Tax Theory Optimisation may also be economically difficult if the Laffer Curve effect holds This means the optimal rate could be where the tax take declines hence makes it even more difficult both economically and politically In addition the optimal tax point is dynamic and may never be truly attainable

  7. The European Approach Tax policy inevitably lags Politicians need to go through a parliamentary due process Thus to track a difficult moving target has proved impractical

  8. The Reality on the Ground Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here 07957 303 892

  9. The Reality on the Ground The UK has a declining trend Many other EU countries the same Scandinavia always seen as a leading light but Denmark DK only 6% of GDP is environmental taxes

  10. The Specifics Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  11. The Specifics Energy taxes are favourite But no possible general trend Cultural mind set and political expedience decides

  12. The Trend Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  13. The Trend Quite a mix between EU states Around 50% of member states have reduced their tax take from environmental taxes Most interesting is that the net amount of take has also been reduced Reduced for EU25, EU27, and EA 15

  14. Energy Taxes - The Trend Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  15. The Trend 1999 was the peak for EU Environmental Taxes But clearly many such taxes were there as revenue raising instruments rather than to save the planet We do not see the Tax Shift we all talk about with the introduction of environmental taxes in the 1990s

  16. What Are The Taxes Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  17. The Specifics Shown are the obvious taxes The UK Government has said that it wishes to use the market to address environmental issues The taxes are there to address what it considers to be areas of market failure “Market failure” is an euphemism for higher than desirable CO2 output for an activity These euphemisms however raise suspicions for Taxpayers

  18. The Specifics There are also some very detailed tax measures E.g. enhanced Capital Allowances for environmentally friendly building components. Highly complex and technical Relief can apply to a specified type of wall which could reduce energy use Separate relief from Stamp Duty for zero emissions residential property

  19. The Specifics Taxation of cars has also changed from 2010 Annual road tax for cars has risen more that 300% for the most polluting vehicles 255g/km CO2 from 2010 In addition for above average emissions vehicles 160g/km and above depreciation allowances will be reduced significantly from 20% to 10% Also addition “showroom” tax on high CO2 output vehicles polluting vehicles as much £1,000 - 2010. Big push to fund electric vehicle production and promotion of £100m and provide public electric charging points and £5,000 per car subsidy on new technology cars e.g. GM Volt

  20. The Specifics Conversely high political sensitivity to consumer’s concerns Recent rises due on fuel duties in 2008 and 2009 were stopped due to high oil prices but two rises in 2010 This is the issue with environmental taxes throughout Europe Significant consumer resistance as lack of understanding what the tax is for

  21. The Specifics One area which might be helpful for the future would be a greater see through (transparency) for environmental taxes – hypothecation Hence taxpayers could see: -that a tax on their cars was paying for a CO2 reducing initiative or -the tax paid for more hospitals but overall tax levels were maintained as Income Tax levels were reduced – Tax Shift Broadly environmental taxes acting as a substitution is probably acceptable to most European tax payers but not a way of augmenting them Thus perhaps the implementation strategy needs to be considered

  22. Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) UK was to introduce a scheme in 2012 where highest polluting businesses and public sector pay in to a fund Fund distributed to least polluters But now fund will be pocketed by Government Nothing to dispel cynicism of environmental taxes

  23. Emissions Trading A part of the EU strategy in this area involves what is called emissions trading Broadly this is how it works 2008 EU member states allocated and sold emissions credits to CO2 emitters via an approved purchaser known in the UK as a “primary purchaser” The UK is currently in phase 2 i.e. most emissions credits issued free but up to 7% auctioned Auction for first time was on 19th November 2008

  24. Emissions Trading Phase 2 from 2008 - 2012 2012 onwards around 100% of credits will be auctioned There can then be additional buying and selling among holders of the credits thus creating a full market Year by year the level of credits hence CO2 emissions will reduce therefore reducing EU emissions Problem in down turn prices dropped through the floor

  25. Emissions Trading Tax effects are meant to be benign Full VAT (GST) recovery where appropriate May also be out side the scope in certain cases therefore not creating partial exemption of itself Companies my elect But has been the subject of missing trader fraud very significant tax losses and created yet another fraud opportunity

  26. Emissions Trading Direct tax perspective Tax profits from sales Deduct from profits costs Therefore see-through and transparent

  27. EU Level The commission is also looking at tax in this area They are in favour of market based instruments (MBIs) – as now happens in member states But also looking to minimum tax levels for energy producing products i.e. gas, coal etc. The commission will look much more to promoting the use of MBIs in the areas of transport, trying to extend these to shipping and aviation The commission recognises that the distributional impacts i.e. less well off impacted more would need to be addressed perhaps through targeted measures For instance UK offers free transport for pensioners

  28. The Future – Concluding Comments The global recession has probably delayed or deferred a greater switch to environmental taxes But even with a new administration in the US there is no clear global consensus The great hopes where the US might lead plans for CO2 emissions reductions have been disappointed Environment taxes only seem to have fair weather friends clear disappointing to see a move to tax shift put on hold or reversed The US mid-term elections if anything indicate an environmental backlash. Many of the now majority party in the House of Representatives question the science behind Global Warming Should we look to Regulation rather than tax

  29. TITLE Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  30. TITLE Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  31. TITLE Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  32. TITLE Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  33. TITLE Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here Lines of text go here

  34. Tax theory

More Related