180 likes | 375 Views
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics. Alexei Safonov Lecture #2. Particle Physics and the Origin of Universe. One example of an open question is the baryon asymmetry Lots of protons, very few antiprotons Why? Shouldn’t there be equal numbers?. time.
E N D
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #2
Particle Physics and the Origin of Universe • One example of an open question is the baryon asymmetry • Lots of protons, very few antiprotons • Why? Shouldn’t there be equal numbers? time • Something must have happened in the very early Universe at the level of basic interactions that shifted things there
Standard Model of Particle Physics • Physical content: • 12 basic particles • Each has an antiparticle • Interact via force carriers called gauge bosons • Higgs boson giving mass to all other particles • Includes 2.5 forces: • Electroweak=“electromagnetic + weak” combined force • All basic particles participate, transmitted by W/Z/g bosons • Responsible for radioactive decays and electromagnetic interactions • Strong force: • Only quarks participate, transmitted by gluons • Holds proton and other composite hadrons together • Dark Matter is unexplained at all • Discovery of neutrino oscillations makes Standard Model at least “not quite right” • Gravity is not included
Special Relativity and QM • Particle physics deals with very small objects where quantum mechanics is the only way to describe things • These things tend to move very fast, so special relativity is equally important • Need to combine both • Start with good old QM equation for a free particle: • This is nothing but E=p2/2m • The trouble is this equation is non-relativistic
Dirac’s Equation • Need to go from • So you write something like this: • But the problem is that the density is not always positively defined in this case • Dirac took this equation: • And tried to write the part under the square root as a square of an operator: • But you need to remove cross-terms, which is only possible if AB+BA=0 • Too bad numbers don’t work that way
Dirac’s Equation • But it works with matrices • That’s great because electron has a spin, you actually want these wave functions to be 2-component spinors like in QM • The strange thing was that one needs 4x4 matrices to satisfy all the requirements • Write as • Apply the same operator again (from left): • That looks familiar if k=m and so • Can write in an explicit 4-dimensional form: • Where matrices
Solution of Dirac’s Equation . . • Solutions: • Fourier transformation for general solution: • Where s is spin +/- ½ and a and b can be thought of as operators creating/annihilating a fermion/anti-fermion • Lagrangian: • This is because one should be able to get equations of motion from the Lagrangian as in classic mechanics: • In field theory you do
Propagator • Take particle from point x to point y: • Where T is “time ordering”: • Plug in our solutions from before: • where
Fermion Propagator • We just learnt how to calculate the amplitude (related to probability) for a particle to travel from point x to point y • In momentum space: • This is something we will need to know how to do to calculate probabilities for scattering processes • Can propagate other particles too
Anything Else? • Yeah, we only know how to describe a free electron and know how to propagate it from point A to point B • Electromagnetism is not about that, it’s about interactions with electromagnetic field – need to add photons that can interact with electrons • Where D is the covariant derivative • Aμ is the covariant four-potential of the electromagnetic field generated by the electron itself; • Bμis the external field imposed by external source; • is electromagentic field tensor
Calculating Amplitudes • This is what we need to do at the end: • Calculate quantum mechanical probability of a specific process happening • First calculate amplitude, amplitude squared is the probability • For scattering processes it is called “cross-section”
Other Processes • What else can happen? • There could be more complex diagrams that include more interconnections and intermediate particles
Good vs “Not So Good” Theories • Renormalizability • Once you start adding more and more complex diagrams, all sorts of ugly things start happening • Infinite amplitudes and cross-sections • Renormalization takes care of it • Or can be an “effective” theory, then no requirements
References • Historical overview and derivation of Dirac’s equation: • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics • A formal (and lengthy) introduction to QED: • Peskin, Schroeder, “An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory”, section 3 • Feynman rules for QED: • Peskin, Schroeder, “An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory”, section 4