1 / 19

Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle. Peter Vitousek Stanford University. We are entering the Anthropocene “the geologic epoch in which the human species has emerged as a globally significant force reshaping the face of Earth” P.J. Crutzen 2002.

sen
Download Presentation

Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle Peter Vitousek Stanford University

  2. We are entering the Anthropocene “the geologic epoch in which the human species has emerged as a globally significant force reshaping the face of Earth” P.J. Crutzen 2002

  3. Global Terrestrial N Budget(Galloway and others 2007) “Natural” Biological N Fixation 70 - 100 Lightning 5 Total Fixed Naturally 75 – 105 Inorganic N Fertilizer 100 Crop N Fixation 30 Fossil Fuel Fixation 25 Industrial Uses of fixed N 20 Total Fixed by Humanity ~175

  4. United States Nitrogen Budget EPA Nitrogen Report 2011

  5. Vitousek 1994

  6. 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Year IPCC Third Assessment Report, 2001

  7. Robertson and Vitousek 2009

  8. Anthropogenic reactive N is distributed unevenly across Earth In some areas we use far too little N, in others we release far too much – and both extremes damage the environment and threaten human well-being.

  9. Comparison of Nutrient Balances Kenya North China Midwest US Maize Yield 2000 N P All in kg ha-1 y-1 Fertilizer 7 8 Removal in harvested 59 7 products Agronomic inputs minus -52 +1 harvest removals Sanchez and Palm pers. communication.

  10. Comparison of Nutrient Balances double crop, w wheat Kenya North China Midwest US Maize Yield 2000 8500 N P N P All in kg ha-1 y-1 Fertilizer 7 8 588 92 Removal in harvested products 59 7 361 39 Agronomic inputs minus harvest removals -52 +1 +227 +53 Ju et al. 2009

  11. Maize-Wheat double-cropping, North China Plain Ju et al. 2009

  12. Comparison of Nutrient Balances Rotation w/soybean Kenya North China Midwest US Maize Yield 2000 8500 8000 N P N P N P All in kg ha-1 y-1 Fertilizer (plus N fixation) 7 8 588 92 155 14 Removal in harvested products 59 7 361 39 145 23 Agronomic inputs minus harvest removals -52 +1 +227 +53 +10 -9 David and Drinkwater pers communication. (Vitousek et al. 2009)

  13. EPA Nitrogen Report 2011

  14. Prof. Fusuo Zhang, Dean, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University

  15. Maize-Wheat double-cropping, North China Plain Ju et al. 2009

  16. Yield and Fertilizer Use ISSM versus Farmer Practice Farmer Practice ISSM Maize Yield (t/ha) 6.8 (1.6) 13.0 (1.6) N input (kg/ha) 257 (121) 237 (70) Yield per unit N added (g/g) 26 (20) 57 (13) N inputs minus harvest removals (kg/ha) +127 (42) -12 (56) Chen et al. 2011

  17. From P. Johnes (personal communication)

  18. We are entering the Anthropocene “the geologic epoch in which the human species has emerged as a globally significant force reshaping the face of Earth” P.J. Crutzen 2002

More Related