1 / 93

Experience of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in NTUH, 1983-2012

Experience of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in NTUH, 1983-2012. 唐季祿 醫師 台大醫院 , 內科部血液科 , 骨髓移植病房 台灣大學台成幹細胞治療中心 . HSCT Center Advancement in NTUH. *HEPA: high-efficient particle absorbing. Largest HSCT center in Taiwan, 14 beds, >100 cases/year. Cumulative numbers of HSCT, 1983-2011 .

senwe
Download Presentation

Experience of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in NTUH, 1983-2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experience of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in NTUH, 1983-2012 唐季祿 醫師 台大醫院,內科部血液科,骨髓移植病房 台灣大學台成幹細胞治療中心

  2. HSCT Center Advancement in NTUH *HEPA: high-efficient particle absorbing Largest HSCT center in Taiwan, 14 beds, >100 cases/year

  3. Cumulative numbers of HSCT, 1983-2011 Allo-BMT 501 -PBSCT 611 -BM+PB 4 -PB+UCB 1 Auto-PBSCT 360 -BMT 36 -BM+PB 10 CBT 24 Total 1547 N 175101111 1191333 28474957535663 64 81 7972777077 7483104 151 151

  4. Annual Numbers of HSCT, 1983-2011 N=1547

  5. Types of Donor, 1983-2011 N=1547

  6. 5PW BMT ward Clean and safe environments Anteroom Pressure / Humidity Central monitor

  7. Friendly and comfortable patient support HEPA-class 10,000 room Toilet- dry/wet separated

  8. HEPA-room (class 10,000) Pressure-releasing facilities Toilet- dry/wet separated Family communication window Anti-mold painting

  9. Autologous Stem Cell Sources by Recipient Age, 1983-2011 Age≦20 yrs Age >20 yrs

  10. Allogeneic Stem Cell Sources by Recipient Age, 1983-2011 Age≦20 yrs Age >20 yrs

  11. Trends in Transplantation by Recipient Age, 1983-2011 N=84 N=322 N=380 N=761 % 8% 12% 32% > 50 y < 50 y Autologous Allogeneic

  12. Allogeneic transplantations by conditioning regimen intensity and age, 2000-2011

  13. 69 y, AML, CR2, s/p MUD-RIST, D+17,轉出隔離病房,D+24出院

  14. Transplant outcome for age older than 55 years of AML or high-risk MDS at NTUH (median age 58 y, 55 - 69) 3-yr overall survival 56.9% 2006 – 2012, unpublished

  15. Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Sources by Recipient Age, 1994-2011 Age >20 yrs Age≦20 yrs

  16. Indications of HSCT, 1983-2011 N=1547 %

  17. Reasons to do HSCT twice or more, 1983-2011 N=113 35 remains alive

  18. Numbers of 2nd Malignancy N=57 20 remains alive

  19. Overall Survival,1983-2011 Disease free survival, 1983-2011 692 dead, 719 alive, 242 remains alive more than 10 years

  20. Overall survival, by transplant eras, 1983-2011

  21. Main cause of death N=692

  22. Main cause of death – by Donor type Autologous Unrelated donor Matched sibling donor

  23. Overall survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplantation for AML, by risk group and cell sources, 1984-2011

  24. Overall survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplantation for ALL, by risk group and cell sources, 1984-2011

  25. Overall survival after HLA-matched sibling transplantation for CML, by risk group and transplant year, 1984-2011

  26. Overall survival after autologous transplantation for Lymphoma, by risk group, 1983-2011

  27. Overall survival for Lymphoma, by transplant type, 1983-2011

  28. Overall survival after allogeneic transplantation for MDS/MPD, 1986-2011

  29. Overall survival after allogeneic transplantation for Anemia, by age group, 1984-2011

  30. 108 / kg BW 106 / kg BW 18 18 Total cells 15 15 CD 34+ cells 12 12 9 p = 0.01 9 p < 0.001 6 6 3 3 0 0 BMT PBSCT (n= 55) (n- 34) BMT PBSCT (n= 55) (n- 34) Results of Stem Cell Yields in Allo-HSCT (Median and 95% C.I.)

  31. 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Probability of Acute GVHD grade 2-4 in HLA-matched Allo-HSCT NTUH 1993-2008.07 P = 0.020 Probability PBSCT 27% (n =174) Allo-BMT 14% (n =180) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time (Days)

  32. 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Probability of chronic cGVHD in HLA-Identical Allo-HSCT NTUH 1993-2008.07 All type cGVHD Extensive cGVHD PBSCT 70% (n =142) PBSCT 48% (n =142) Probability P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001 BMT 25% (n =162) BMT 10% (n =162) 0 6 12 18 24 0 6 12 18 24 months months

  33. GVHD can improve 5-year Leukemia-free survival GVHD (+) 78% No GVHD 61% P =0.006

  34. 19M Stem Cell Donors Worldwide

  35. Allogeneic Transplants for Age > 20yrs,Registered with the CIBMTR 1992-2009- by Donor Type and Graft Source - Number of Transplants * * Data incomplete Slide 11 SUM-WW11_11.ppt

  36. 1.0 0.8 HLA-Matched sibling donor P = 0.05 0.6 0.4 Allo-PBSCT (n =34) 0.2 Allo-BMT (n =55) 0 0 60 120 Time (Days) First Taiwan UD-BMT Outcome Report (Shaw CK et al, BMT 23:727, 1999) • 1994~1997 Total 48 Taiwan patients analyzed Engraftment rate 83.3% Acute GVHD 80% ≧ grade 2 67.5% grade 3-4 37.5%  Similar to NMDP data but higher than that from JMDP, Japan

  37. Grade 3-4 acute GVHD 1.0 1.0 CsA + MTX 73% (12/22) 0.8 0.8 P < 0.0001 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 ATG + MMF/MTX 5% (1/35) FK-506 + MTX +Steroid 0% (0/17) 0.2 0.2 0 0 Post-HSCT days 0 20 40 60 80 100 Impact of GVHD Prophylaxis on Acute GVHD after URD-HSCT, NTUH 1994-2005 Grade 2-4 acute GVHD CsA + MTX 84% (18/22) P < 0.0001 ATG + MMF/MTX 47% (14/35) FK-506 + MTX 36% (4/17) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Post-HSCT days

  38. Improving 3y-OS after URD-HSCT in leukemia since 2004 in NTUH (n=254) SR + IR HR 2004-2012 52% (n=102) 2004-2012 50% (n=39) 1994-2003 24% (n=41) 1994-2003 8% (n=12) P < 0.001 P < 0.001

  39. Protocol for Allo-HSCT with PMRD F F F F F Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d x 5d C C Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/Kg/d x 2d Fractional TBI total 1200 cGy or Busulfan 16 mg/Kg PBSCT D-8 D-7 D-6 D-5 D-4 D-3 D-2 D-1 D 0 D+1 D+2 D+3 D+4 Donor : G-CSF 10 ug/Kg/d x 5d A A A (rabbit) ATG 2.5 mg/Kg/d x 3d GVHD prophylaxis : CsA 3 mg/Kg/d, D-1~D+30 then taper Methotrexate

  40. Haploidentical HSCT ─ Results • All engrafted with 100% donor chimerism (FISH or STR) • Acute GVHD: 9% (1/11, grade 1) • Chronic GVHD: 100% (5/5, 2 extensive) • CMV infection: 73% (8/11), EBV-PTLD: 18% (2/11)

  41. Parental donor vs. URD HSCTNTUH 2001-2011

  42. AML: significant advancement in the past decades

  43. Intensity of Consolidation correlated with adult AML Survival (NTUH, 1985-1999) BMT (n=41) BMT (n=41) Standard C/T (n=182) Standard C/T (n=139) Low-dose or no C/T (n=24) Low-dose or no C/T (n=36) All patients (n=259) Patients age 50 years or less (n=204)

  44. HSCT for AML (NTUH, 1984-2011) • 425 HSCT, 54 received twice, total 479 • Auto-HSCT 33 (8%), allo-HSCT 392 (92%) • Sex (M: F) 213 : 212 • Median age (range) 32 y/o (1-69) • Disease status at HSCT • CR1 (SR) 176 (42%) • CR2 (IR) 143 (34%) • Relapsed/refractory (HR) 103 (24%)

  45. Comparable outcome of Auto- vs Allo-HSCT for AML in CR1 Overall Survival Relapse risk At 5 years, 62% vs. 64%, p=0.602 At 5 years, 33% vs. 29%, p=0.770 Allo-HSCT (n=155) Auto-HSCT (n=21) Auto-HSCT (n=21) Allo-HSCT (n=155)

  46. Poor outcome after auto-HSCT in AML >CR1 Overall Survival Relapse risk Auto-HSCT (n=9) 100% vs. 54%, p=0.003 At 5 years, 0% vs. 30%, p=0.196 Allo-HSCT (n=237) Allo-HSCT (n=237) Auto-HSCT (n=9) • Auto: 8 at CR2, 1 at CR3, all died, 8 relapse, 1 TRM

  47. Independent risk factors for OS in 325 AML Multivariate Cox regression analysis for OS

  48. Post-HSCT 5 year OS Post-HSCT 5 year RFS CEBPA double mutation 88% (n=9) CEBPA double mutation CEBPA double mutation 78% (n=9) Other genotypes 46% (n=91) Other genotypes 38% (n=91) P=0.045 P=0.045 CEBPA double mutation had better OS and RFS

More Related