290 likes | 391 Views
Inclusive semileptonic B decays: experimental. Elisabetta Barberio University of Melbourne FPCP: Vancouver April 2006. Standard Model Consistency Tests. V ub and V cb provide a test of CP violation in the Standard Model comparing the measurements on the ( r , h ) plane.
E N D
Inclusive semileptonic B decays:experimental Elisabetta Barberio University of Melbourne FPCP: Vancouver April 2006
Standard Model Consistency Tests Vub and Vcb provide a test of CP violation in the Standard Model comparing the measurements on the (r, h) plane The width of the green ring need to be reduced to match sin2b and other measurements The error on the ring width is dominated by Vub Goal: Accurate determination of |Vub| E. Barberio
Semileptonic B decays Vcb ,Vub u + long distance: ,u tree level, short distance: decay properties depend directly on |Vcb|, |Vub|,mb perturbative regime (asn) But quarks are bound by soft gluons: non-perturbative (LQCD) long distance interactions of b quark with light quark E. Barberio
Inclusive semileptonic decays Many theorists love inclusive semileptonic decays Short distance is calculable Long distance leading orderand short distance contribution are cleanly separated and probability to hadronnize is 1 To compare Operator Product Expansion predictions with experiments: integration over neutrino and lepton phase space provides smearing over the invariant hadronic mass of the final state E. Barberio
Inclusive semileptonic decays Vcb vs Vub Vcb: most accurate determination from the inclusive decays 2% precision limited by theory error precise Heavy Quarks parameters, tests of OPE Vub: 7.5% precision shared between experimental and theoretical errors small rate and large bcln background space cuts to remove bcln background which introduce O(1) dependence on non-preturbative b-quark distribution function E. Barberio
Vcb from inclusive semileptonic decays exp. D|Vcb|<1% Gsldescribed by Heavy Quark Expansion in (1/mb)n and ask non perturbative parameters need to be measured The expansion depend on mb definition: non-perturbative terms are expansion dependent Theory error was dominated by 1/mb3terms and above E. Barberio
Bc moments in semileptonic decays Xn are relate to non-perturbative parameters moments evaluated on the full lepton spectrum or part of it: p > pmin in the B rest frame higher moments are sensitive to 1/mb3terms reduce theory error on Vcb and HQ parameters E. Barberio
Inclusive SL decays rate |Vcb| shape mc, m2G, mb, m2p shape |Vcb| shape rate Difficulty to go from measured shape to true shape: e.g. QED corrections, accessible phase space, resolution, background E. Barberio
moments in semileptonic decays E : lepton energy spectrum in BXc n (BaBar BelleCLEODelphi) MX 2: hadronic mass spectrum in BXc n (BaBarCDFCLEODelphi) Most recent measurements from Belle mx(GeV) P*l (GeV) P*l (GeV) Plmin =0.7 GeV Plmin =0.4 GeV from the moments of these distributions we get Vcb and HQ parameters E. Barberio
Parameters Extraction BABAR: up to 1/mb3:fit ~90 measurement to extract HQ parameter and Vcb at the same time o= used,•= unusedin the nominal fit BABAR MX moments M1x M2x M4x M3x c2/ndf =20/15 M2l M3l M1l M0l P.Gambino, N.Uraltsev hep-ph/0401063 hep-ph/0403166 Red line: HQE fitYellow band: theory errors E. Barberio
Vcb and HQ parameters Exp HQ Gsl Global fit Kinetic scheme expansion (hep-ph/0507253) dVcb @ 2% mb < 1%, mc @ 5% U(1S) expansion scheme has similar results used measurements: E. Barberio
Vub inclusive determination B Xuln rate tree level from OPE corrected forperturbativeas andnon-perturbative1/mb terms In principle main uncertainty from mb5 BUT….. Br(BXuln)/Br(BXcln) =1/50 E. Barberio
Shape Function F(K+) L = MB -mb K+ 0 Limited phase space to reduce the B Xcln background: OPE doesn’t work everywhere in the phase space non-perturbativeShape Function F(K+) to extrapolate to the full phase space Detailed shape not constrained, in particular the low tail Mean and r.m.s. are known Shape Function need to be determined from experimental data E. Barberio
Inclusive B Xuln El = lepton energy l q2 = lepton-neutrino mass squared n B mX = hadron system mass Xu P+ = EX -|PX| bc bc bc bc bu bu bu bu mu << mc exploits different kinematics Signal events have smaller MX and P+ Larger El and q2 Not to scale! E. Barberio
Lepton Endpoint BABARPRD 73:12006Belle PLB 621:28CLEO PRL 88:231803 BaBar First measurement from CLEO El>2.3 GeV BaBar El>2.0 GeV Belle El> 1.9 GeV Crucial accurate subtraction of background is crucial! S/B ~1/10 eff~ 40% E. Barberio
Measuring mXq2 P+ BABARhep-ex/0507017Belle PRL 95:241801 Reconstruct all decay products to measure MX,q2 or P+ fully-reconstructed B meson flavor and momentum known lepton in the recoil-B mmiss consistent with a neutrino lepton charge consistent with B flavor left-over particles belong to X equal mB on both sides; mmiss = 0 S/B ~ 2 Eff~ 0.1% E. Barberio
Measuring Partial Branching Fraction P+ BLNP PRL93:221802 E. Barberio
b → sg Inclusive b → clv Eg El mX ShapeFunction HQE Fit mb Turning DB into |Vub| SSFs Inclusiveb → ulv El HFAG main results: HQ parameters form b Xcln and b Xsg hep-ph/0507253 |Vub| q2 mX duality WA
Dealing with Shape Function Belle Eg>1.8 GeV easy to fit shape function Better resolution K* peak (more difficult for SF) E*g (GeV) Eg (GeV) Solution use directly the g spectrum: theory E. Barberio
Inclusive |Vub|: BLNP framework |Vub| world average as of Winter 06 Inputs: mb(SF) = 4.60 0.04 GeV mp2(SF) = 0.20 0.04 GeV2 |Vub|BLNP=(4.45 0.20 0.26) 10-3 d|Vub| = 7.3% E. Barberio
Theory Errors l b B u q n q Quark-hadron duality is not considered (cut dependent) • b clnand b sg data fit well HQ predictions Weak annihilation 1.9% error • Expected to be <2% of the total rate • Gw.a./G(b u) < 7.4 % from CLEO HQ parameters 4.1% mainly mb; kinematics cuts depend on mb,! Sub-leading shape function 3.8% dominated by the lepton endpoint measurements E. Barberio
Inclusive |Vub|: DGE framework Dressed Gluon Exponentiation (DGE) on-shell b-quark calculation converted into hadronic variables used as approximation to the meson decay spectrum Still digesting the method |Vub|DGE = (4.41 0.20 0.20) 10-3 DGE theory 2.9%matching scheme method and scale mb(MS) 1.3% on event fractionmb(MS)=4.200.04 GeV as 1.0% on event fraction total GSL 3.0 % E. Barberio
Vub without Shape Function Babar Based on Leibovich, Low, Rothstein, PLB 486:86 First proposal by Neubert Weight function Babar Babar mxcut OPE mx<2.50 GeV LLR mx<1.67 GeV E. Barberio
|Vub|: inclusive vs exclusive |Vub| exclusive |Vub| inclusive W.A. Winter 06 W.A. Winter 06 E. Barberio
|Vub|: CKM consistency Vub from exclusive measurements Vub from inclusive measurements Most probable value of Vub from measurements of other CKM parameters Standard Model predictions with Dms measurement (thank to Pierini) E. Barberio
Conclusions b cln Vcb2% error dominated by theory, mb@1% (kinetic and U(1S) schemes), mc @5% (kinetic scheme) but how well do we know the B Xcln spectrum? b uln Vub~7.4% error shared between theoretical and experimental inclusive vs exclusive less than 1.4 s difference, depending on the inclusive extracting method We have now different methods to extract Vub |Vub| @ 5% possible? Improve knowledge of B Xcln, B Xuln and more work on the theoretical error E. Barberio
Inclusive |Vub|: comparisons HQ parameters from cln and sg HQ parameters from sg only E. Barberio
Mx unfolded spectrum for BXcln Belle D* D D** E. Barberio
photon energy spectrum u, c, t Belle Eg>1.8 GeV Eg>2 GeV Eg: photon energy spectrum in Bsg (BaBar BelleCLEODelphi) photon energy spectrum in BXsg not sensitive to new physics and give information on B structure CLEO E. Barberio