1 / 21

Magnets and Other issues

Magnets and Other issues. Elena Wildner WP4 meeting, CERN team. Present activities II. Visit to Krakow 4/1/ 2010, Epiphany 2010, International Physics Conference Disseminate our results http://epiphany.ifj.edu.pl/current/

sevita
Download Presentation

Magnets and Other issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Magnets and Other issues Elena Wildner WP4 meeting, CERN team

  2. Present activities II • Visit to Krakow 4/1/ 2010, Epiphany 2010, International Physics Conference • Disseminate our results http://epiphany.ifj.edu.pl/current/ • Show importance of manpower support for ion production (Ne) to be able to present a realistic baseline for beta beams that, according to my understanding, is now emerging. • Visit to Legnaro 13/1 2010 (Venice airport) • EmanueleVardaci has extensive work to present in Paris (Li) • Enhance FLUKA for simulation of reaction in target • Boron experiments in India? Legnaro sets up the contact!

  3. Present activities I • SPC-work finished (results will be available after Chamonix?) • Stability analysis of PS(2) and SPS for FP6 Baseline (PS, Christian does SPS), 5 months/machine • Consolidation FP6 • Search for limits and improvements for FP7 • Stripping after ion source (emmittance, particle loss) • Methods • EXCEL sheet, FLUKA, Geant4?? • Charge states to be discussed in Paris • Magnet specification for the decay ring improvement • Interactions with TE/MCS and CEA • Decay Ring redesign

  4. Superconducting Magnets • Specify for main Dipole and Quadrupole • Magnet Field and Gradient • Magnet Length • Apertures • Liner thickness for dipole (not open midplane) • Magnet cross section for the FLUKA model • Optics dependent • Collaboration with CEA

  5. Choice of magnets (Antoine is calculating optics) • Main Dipole (will certainly decrease duty-factor by some 10 %) • Max 5 m for Nb3Sn • 160 mm total aperture, one bore • 12 T, Nb3Sn • Liner 10 mm • Yoke diameter ? • Magnet cross section: simplify, use LHC cable • Quad • 1 m long? Good to shorten!

  6. New efforts to increase intensity • Injection and merging • More merges (30 ?) • Increase RF • Change injection energy • Displace injected beam • Other options not realistic? • Change bunch length for B and Li in SPS? • We need some time to see if smart solutions exist • Proposal, Rubbia et al. • How was the intensity issue addressed?

  7. Intensity/Number of merges Courtesy A. Chance

  8. Intensity/Number of Merges (ref) Courtesy A. Chance

  9. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  10. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  11. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  12. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  13. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  14. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  15. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  16. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  17. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  18. Beam Size Courtesy A. Chance

  19. Courtesy A. Chance

  20. Rf Voltage Courtesy A. Chance

  21. Dutyfactor Courtesy A. Chance

More Related