1 / 11

MIFIRA Training Module Lecture 6 Domestic a vailability and prospective s ource m arkets

MIFIRA Training Module Lecture 6 Domestic a vailability and prospective s ource m arkets. Chris Barrett and Erin Lentz February 2012. I ntegration with the global market. MIFIRA questions we address: 2a. Where are viable prospective source markets?

shadi
Download Presentation

MIFIRA Training Module Lecture 6 Domestic a vailability and prospective s ource m arkets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIFIRA Training ModuleLecture 6Domestic availability and prospective source markets Chris Barrett and Erin Lentz February 2012

  2. Integration with the global market MIFIRA questions we address: 2a. Where are viable prospective source markets? 2b. Will agency purchases drive up food prices excessively in source markets? 2c. Will local or regional purchases affect producer prices differently than transoceanic shipments?

  3. Price Bands Due to transactions costs, smaller, more remote markets may not be integrated with with the global market or with the main wholesale market Source: Barrett (2008), Food Policy

  4. Price Bands In this setting, domestic markets may be segmented. This result leads to a generalized version of Deaton’s net benefit ratio: where 1st [bracketed] term is the standard formulation, but the two price transmission terms link the IPP (pcb) to the local market (pcm) and the local market to the household-specific shadow price (pc*) . Either may be zero.

  5. Import parity price IPP = anchor price relating domestic wholesale market to the global commodity market. Should set an upper bound on domestic market commodity price. = pCIF + tariff at the national market hub Sometimes available directly from secondary sources. More commonly, mustconstruct IPP series from secondary data series or interviews with importers or NGO or WFP offices that procure aid regionally.

  6. Implications for response analysis If IPP ≤ local wholesale market price, traders have a commercial incentive to import unless restricted by government or by financial or logistical bottlenecks. So long as this is not because of barriers to trade, then cash or vouchers likely to stimulate commercial imports. If IPP > local market price, segmented from global market. - If this is b/c ample food available, explore local purchase options for food procurement. - If this is b/c admin, financial or logistical barriers yield low prices plus food scarcity, explore regional food procurement options.

  7. Using IPP in Local and Regional Procurement • WFP procurement (as reported by Tschirley and del Castillo, 2006) switches away from local procurement when local prices exceed import parity.

  8. Calculating IPP • Take world market price, usually FOB in export market – get from pink sheet, IFS or related source. • Add ocean freight and insurance costs – get from key informants or Baltic Exchange series. • Convert to local currency terms using exchange rates – from IFS, central bank or local banks. • Add tariff rates (note if it is ad valorem or specific). • Adjust for any local transport, storage or handling costs. Compare this against local market price series, commonly available from central statistical agency (for computing consumer price index) or Ministry of Agriculture. Note that sometimes the local product and the imported product are not directly comparable (e.g., palm oil produced domestically versus imported vegetable oil).

  9. Analyzing IPPs Plot the hub market wholesale price series for the same commodity against the IPP. Are domestic market prices ≤ or ≥ IPP? If possible, also plot commercial import volumes to see if commercial imports respond as expected. After visual review, compute mkt integration statistics to test for price comovement Bangladesh example:

  10. Import Parity Prices • Limitations to the analytic • IPPs become less useful when there are: • - significant non-tariff barriers (e.g., quotas, GMO bans, binding SPS or other regulatory/technical barriers to trade) • - not free and open competition among importers or on the domestic wholesale market (e.g., due to gov’t licensing) • - binding FX restrictions so that official and black market exchange rates diverge.

  11. Import Parity Prices and Price Bands Limitations of the IPP The IPP is not always relevant to smaller, more remote markets. Smaller, remote markets are often not well-integrated with the main wholesale market. In this sort of setting, the impact of changes in the IPP can often be zero.

More Related