1 / 34

Hippity Hop Rabbit Food - A Well-Designed Experiment on Rabbits

This experiment tests the effects of Hippity Hop Rabbit Food on rabbits' fur, energy, and growth compared to the old rabbit food. The experiment uses randomization and a control group for accurate results.

shadle
Download Presentation

Hippity Hop Rabbit Food - A Well-Designed Experiment on Rabbits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 5 Experimental Design

  2. Definitions: 1) Observational study - observe outcomes without imposing any treatment 2) Experiment - actively impose some treatment in order to observe the response

  3. Hippity Hop Rabbit Food I’ve developed a new rabbit food, Hippity Hop. Makes fur soft & shiny! Increases energy! 100% of daily vitamins & essential oils!

  4. Can I just make these claims? NO What must I do to make these claims? Do an experiment Who (what) should I test this on? Rabbits What do I test? The type of food

  5. 3)Experimental unit – the single individual (person, animal, plant, etc.) to which the different treatments are assigned 4) Factor – is the explanatory variable 5) Level – a specific value for the factor

  6. 6) Response variable – what you measure 7) Treatment – a specific experimental condition applied to the units

  7. Iplan to test my new rabbit food. What are my experimental units? What is my factor? What is the response variable? Rabbits Type of food How well they grow

  8. Hippity Hop I’ll use my pet rabbit, Lucky! Since Lucky’s coat is shinier & he has more energy, then Hippity Hop is a better rabbit food!

  9. 8) Control group – a group that is used to compare the factor against; can be a placebo or the “old” or current item 9) Placebo – a “dummy” treatment that can have no physical effect

  10. Old Food Hippity Hop Now I’ll use Lucky & my friend’s rabbit, Flash. Lucky gets Hippity Hop food & Flash gets the old rabbit food. WOW! Lucky is bigger & shinier so Hippity Hop is better!

  11. Old Food Hippity Hop The first five rabbits that I catch will get Hippity Hop food and the remaining five will get the old food. The Hippity Hop rabbits have scored higher so it’s the better food!

  12. Old Food Hippity Hop 6 2 4 5 9 10 1 7 3 8 Number the rabbits from 1 – 10. Place the numbers in a hat. The first five numbers pulled from the hat will be the rabbits that get Hippity Hop food. The remaining rabbits get the old food. 5 8 7 3 9 I evaluated the rabbits & found that the rabbits eating Hippity Hop are better than the old food!

  13. 10) blinding - method used so that units do not know which treatment they are getting 11) double blind - neither the units nor the evaluator know which treatment a subject received

  14. Hippity Hop Rabbit Food Hippity Hop Rabbit Food makes fur soft and shiny, & increases energy for ALL types of rabbits! Can I make this claim?

  15. Principles of Experimental Design • Control of effects of extraneous variables on the response – by comparing treatment groups to a control group (placebo or “old”) • Replication of the experiment on many subjects to quantify the natural variation in the experiment • Randomization – the use of chance to assign subjects to treatments

  16. The ONLY way to show cause & effect is with a well-designed, well-controlled experiment! The ONLY way to show cause & effect is with a well-designed, well-controlled experiment!! The ONLY way to show cause & effect is with a well-designed, well-controlled experiment!!!

  17. Example 1: A farm-product manufacturer wants to determine if the yield of a crop is different when the soil is treated with three different types of fertilizers. Fifteen similar plots of land are planted with the same type of seed but are fertilized differently. At the end of the growing season, the mean yield from the sample plots is compared. Experimental units? Factors? Levels? Response variable? How many treatments? Plots of land Type of fertilizer Fertilizer types A, B, & C Yield of crop 3

  18. Example 2: A consumer group wants to test cake pans to see which works the best (bakes evenly). It will test aluminum, glass, and plastic pans in both gas and electric ovens. Experiment units? Factors? Levels? Response variable? Number of treatments? Cake batter Two factors - type of pan & type of oven Type of pan has 3 levels (aluminum, glass, & plastic & type of oven has 2 levels (electric & gas) How evenly the cake bakes 6

  19. Example 3: A farm-product manufacturer wants to determine if the yield of a crop is different when the soil is treated with three different types of fertilizers. Fifteen similar plots of land are planted with the same type of seed but are fertilized differently. At the end of the growing season, the mean yield from the sample plots is compared. Why is the same type of seed used on all 15 plots? What are other potential extraneous variables? Does this experiment have a placebo? Explain It is part of the controls in the experiment. Type of soil, amount of water, etc. NO – a placebo is not needed in this experiment

  20. Experiment Designs • Completely randomized – all experimental units are allocated at random among all treatments

  21. Treatment B Treatment A Treatment C Treatment D Randomly assign experimental units to treatments Completely randomized design

  22. Randomized block – units are blocked into groups and then randomly assigned to treatments

  23. Treatment B Treatment A Treatment A Treatment B Put into homogeneous groups Randomly assign experimental units to treatments Randomized block design

  24. Matched pairs - a special type of block design • match up experimental units according to similar characteristics & randomly assign on to one treatment & the other automatically gets the 2nd treatment • have each unit do both treatments in random order • the assignment of treatments is dependent

  25. Treatment B Treatment A Next, randomly assign one unit from a pair to Treatment A. The other unit gets Treatment B. Pair experimental units according to specific characteristics. This is one way to do a matched pairs design – another way is to have the individual unit do both treatments (as in a taste test).

  26. 12) Confounding variable – the effect of the confounding variable on the response cannot be separated from the effects of the explanatory variable (factor)

  27. Suppose we wish to test a new deodorant against one currently on the market.

  28. Treatment B Treatment A One group is assigned to treatment A & the other group to treatment B. Treatment A Treatment B Confoundingdoes NOToccur in a completely randomized design! Treatment & group are confounded

  29. Example 4: An article from USA Today reports the number of victims of violent crimes per 1000 people. 51 victims have never been married, 42 are divorced or separated, 13 are married, and 8 are widowed. Is this an experiment? Why or why not? What is a potential confounding variable? No, no treatment was imposed on people. Age – younger people are more at risk to be victims of violent crimes

  30. Example 5: Four new word-processing programs are to be compared by measuring the speed with which standard tasks can be completed. One hundred volunteers are randomly assigned to one of the four programs and their speeds are measured. Is this an experiment? Why or why not? Yes, a treatment is imposed. What type of design is this? Factors? Levels? Response variable? Completely randomized one factor: word-processing program with 4 levels speed

  31. You could do a block design where each person uses each program in random order. Example 5: Four new word-processing programs are to be compared by measuring the speed with which standard tasks can be completed. One hundred volunteers are randomly designed to one of the four programs and their speeds are measured. Is there a potential confounding variable? Can this design be improved? Explain. NO, completely randomized designs have no confounding

  32. Example 6: Suppose that the manufacturer wants to test a new fertilizer against the current one on the market. Ten 2-acre plots of land scattered throughout the county are used. Each plot is subdivided into two subplots, one of which is treated with the current fertilizer, and the other with the new fertilizer. Wheat is planted and the crop yields are measured. What type of design is this? Why use this method? When does randomization occur? Matched - pairs design Randomly assigned treatment to first acre of each two-acre plot

  33. Randomization reduces bias by spreading any uncontrolled confounding variables evenly throughout the treatment groups. Blocking also helps reduce variability. Variability is controlled by sample size. Larger samples produce statistics with less variability.

  34. High bias & high variability High bias & low variability Low bias & low variability Low bias & high variability

More Related