1.29k likes | 1.53k Views
Chapter 6. Supply of Labor to the Economy: The Decision to Work. Recall the trends in labor force participation that we discussed in Chapter 2:. a dramatic increase in the number of women in the labor force a decline in labor force participation by men (especially older men)
E N D
Chapter 6 Supply of Labor to the Economy: The Decision to Work
Recall the trends in labor force participation that we discussed in Chapter 2: • a dramatic increase in the number of women in the labor force • a decline in labor force participation by men (especially older men) • the average workweek has fallen from 54.3 hours in 1901 to 37.0 hours in 1989.
What affects an individual's decision to work? • the supply of labor can be thought of as the opposite of the demand for leisure • in this class, every hour that you are not working for pay is considered “leisure” • we’re going to assume that people need 8 hours for sleeping, eating, etc. so they have 16 hours per day available for either work or leisure
Why do people work? • income is used to buy goods and services
People wish to maximize utility • U = U(C , l) + + Or: • U = U(C , h) + - • utility maximization is subject to a consumer’s budget constraint
Marginal utility • the additional utility from consuming an additional unit of a good • MUx is positive, but diminishing
Utility is maximized where MUx/Px = MUy/Py We can then say that if a person is choosing between leisure (l) and consumption (C), utility is maximized when: MUl / Pl = MUC / PC This is another version of the equi-marginal principle
What if MUl/Pl MUC/PC? Suppose that MUl/Pl< MUC/PC : • need to increase the left-hand side or decrease the right hand side • therefore, we need to either decrease l or increase C • this should make sense because the MU of the last $1 spent on C is larger than the MU of the last $1 spent on l • thus, we should buy less l and more C
What if MUl/Pl MUC/PC? Suppose that MUl/Pl >MUC/PC : • need to decrease the left-hand side or increase the right hand side • therefore, we need to either increase l or decrease C • this should make sense because the MU of the last $1 spent on C is smaller than the MU of the last $1 spent on l • thus, we should buy more l and less C
Income Effect • when income increases, the consumer can continue to buy the original combination and still have money left over • we assume that consumers spend their budgets • therefore he buys more normal goods and fewer inferior goods
Substitution Effect • when relative prices change, a consumer will buy more of the relatively cheaper good • substitute the relatively cheaper good for the relatively more expensive good
What happens if income increases? • any increase in nonlabor income (so the wage has not changed) will lead to a drop in hours worked • assume that h = hours of work and Y = income:
What happens if the wage increases? • any increase in wage (when total income has not changed) will lead to an increase in hours worked
Both of these effects occur when wages rise • as w increases, the worker has an increase in real income since at current hours he is now earning more money; the income effect implies a reduction in hours of work • as w increases, the price of leisure rises relative to the price of consumption; thus, there is a substitution effect, where the worker substitutes consumption (the relatively cheaper good)for leisure (the relatively more expensive good) by working more hours
The income and substitution effects offset each other. • if the income effect is dominant, the worker will respond by reducing his hours of work (increasing leisure) • if the substitution effect is dominant, the worker will respond by increasing his hours of work (decreasing leisure)
Individual labor supply curves may be backward bending • the substitution effect usually dominates at low wages and the income effect usually dominates at high wages • because of these offsetting effects, tax incentives may either increase or decrease hours of work
Backward-bending Labor Supply Curve w Hours of work
w When the wage rises from W1 to W2, Ls rises W2 W1 Hours of work L1 L2
w W2 W1 When the wage rises from W1 to W2, Ls falls L2 L1 Hours of work
Graphic analysis of the hours of work decision- - Maximizing utility subject to a budget constraint.
Indifference curves • reflect the combination of consumption (C) and leisure (l) that result in the same level of utility
C($) Leisure
C($) C1 l1 Leisure
C($) C1 C2 l2 l1 Leisure
Rules for indifference curves: • a whole set of indifference curves can be drawn through any point on the plane • indifference curves cannot intersect • indifference curves have negative slopes • indifference curves are convex • indifference curves differ across people
Indifference curves have negative slopes • a person must give up leisure to get additional consumption • the slope of the indifference curve is equal to the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) • MRS shows the rate that the individual is willing to give up an additional unit of C for an additional unit of l along an indifference curve
C($) slope = - MUl / MUC C1 C2 Leisure l1 l2
Indifference curves are convex • when consumption is relatively high (and leisure is relatively low), an additional hour of leisure is highly valued • consumers are willing to give up more consumption for an additional hour of leisure at this point than they are when consumption is low and leisure is relatively high. • this is due to diminishing marginal utility
C($) slope = - MUl / MUC C1 C2 C3 C4 l1 l2 Leisure l3 l4
Different people have different indifference curves • a person who places a high value on leisure will have a relatively steeper indifference curve than someone who places a low value on leisure • likewise, a person who places a high value on consumption will have a relatively flatter indifference curve than someone who places a low value on consumption
C($) Tom places a higher value on leisure (and a lower value on consumption) than Joe does C1 UJoe UTom l1 Leisure
C($) Tom requires more additional consumption to give up another hour of leisure than Joe does C1 UJoe UTom l1 Leisure l1-1
Indifference curves cannot intersect • preferences are assumed to be transitive This means that: If A is preferred to B, and B is preferred to C, then A is preferred to C • more is assumed to be preferred to less
C($) D has more C and l than B does. Therefore, a person could not be indifferent between combinations A and B and A and D A D U0 B U1 Leisure
C($) Which indifference curve represents a higher level of utility? U1 U0 Leisure
Since more is preferred to less, we would like to consume everything possible, but we are constrained by our income.
Budget Constraint • reflects all possible combinations of consumption and leisure that can be purchased given the worker’s wage and the prices of consumption goods
Total time available is T • T can be divided up into hours of work (h) and hours of leisure (l) • the Y-intercept is equal to nonlabor income (v) plus labor earnings (w*h) Y = v + w*h • let’s start with no nonlabor income (v=0)
C($) slope = -w Leisure Hours of work
C($) w*T slope = -w Leisure T
C($) What if nonlabor income is not equal to 0? w*T v } v Leisure T
C($) If nonlabor income is equal to v, the budget constraint shifts up by that amount w*T+v w*T slope = -w v } v Leisure T
Let’s assume: • a person has 16 hours in a day to use to either work or consume leisure (the other 8 are used to sleep, eat, etc.) • the hourly wage is $5 • the individual has no nonlabor income • the price of consumption goods is $1 (we measure consumption in $ worth of goods)
C($) slope = - 5 $80 Leisure 16
C($) If the hourly wage increases to $10, what will happen to the budget constraint? slope = - 5 $80 Leisure 16
C($) $160 slope = - 10 $80 slope = - 5 Leisure 16