180 likes | 315 Views
Region II Infertility Prevention Project Advisory Committee May 16-17, 2007 New York, New York. Steven J. Shapiro Infertility Prevention Project Coordinator CDC/NCHHSTP/DSTDP/PTB (proposed)
E N D
Region II Infertility Prevention Project Advisory CommitteeMay 16-17, 2007New York, New York Steven J. Shapiro Infertility Prevention Project Coordinator CDC/NCHHSTP/DSTDP/PTB (proposed) Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Performance MeasuresData Review • Region II and National Summary Data • Data Verification • Prevalence Monitoring and Performance Measure Data • Regional Summary • Project Area Snapshot
Performance MeasureIPP CS1 Among clients of IPP Family Planning clinics, the proportion of women with positive chlamydia tests treated within 14 and 30 days of the date of specimen collection.
Performance MeasureIPP CS2 Among clients of IPP Family Planning clinics, the proportion of women with positive gonorhea tests treated within 14 and 30 days of the date of specimen collection.
Performance MeasureCSPS MLS1 Proportion of female admittees to large juvenile detention centers tested for chlamydia.
Data Verification • Performance Measures Guidance: • IPP Family Planning Clinics: All family planning clinics that report data as part of the Chlamydia Prevalence Monitoring Project, regardless of whether they are integrated clinics or not. • Denominator: Total number of women who tested positive for chlamydia (at those family planning clinics) • In other words: If ten FP clinics in a jurisdiction report 500 CT positives and 9500 CT negatives to the prevalence monitoring database, then the denominator for the performance measure should be 500.
Prevalence Monitoring v. Performance MeasureFemales in IPP Family Planning ClinicsChlamydia and Gonorrhea 2005Region II Summary
Reasons for Differences • 2005 data • If Prev. Monitoring > Perf. Measures • Prevalence Monitoring data includes only those clinics who reported more than a total of 25 tests during the year • Not counting integrated clinics • If Prev. Monitoring < Perf. Measures • Non-prevalence monitoring FP sites submitting data for performance measures • Counting non-FP sites • ???
Prevalence Monitoring v. Performance MeasureFemales in IPP Family Planning ClinicsChlamydia 2005
Prevalence Monitoring v. Performance MeasureFemales in IPP Family Planning ClinicsGonorrhea 2005