1 / 19

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in SESLHD: The feasibility of using a student-assisted model.

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in SESLHD: The feasibility of using a student-assisted model. Jessica Worton - Neurological Rehabilitation, St George Hospital , Sydney (for SESLHD). Background.

shaina
Download Presentation

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in SESLHD: The feasibility of using a student-assisted model.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in SESLHD: The feasibility of using a student-assisted model. Jessica Worton - Neurological Rehabilitation, St George Hospital, Sydney (for SESLHD)

  2. Background • Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) has strong evidence in the Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management (2017) Reference: Stroke Foundation (2017). Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from https://app.magicapp.org/app#/guideline/2282

  3. Background • Within South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD) CIMT has not been provided consistently or with fidelity. • Clinicians who reported previous use of CIMT did not demonstrate knowledge of all essential components. • Perceived lack of time and resources was a barrier

  4. Aim • To investigate the feasibility of delivering CIMT via a student-assisted model for patients following a stroke.

  5. Acknowledgements Clinicians Project Team Jessica Worton (Project Lead – SESLHD) Karleen Dumbrell (OT advisor – SESLHD) Daniel Treacy (PT advisor – SESLHD) Becky Walsh, Dan Shaw, Leshae Johnston (Improvement and Innovation Hub, SESLHD) Prince of Wales Hospital Clare Griffin (OT) Elizabeth Hobbs (AHA) Jayne Agostino (OT) Karin Vogel (OT) Kathleen Makgroglou (OT) Kelly Drowley (OT) Lauren Taylor (OT) Madeline Petrie (OT) Stephanie Potts (PT) Whitney Harris (PT) St George Hospital Callie Chan (OT) Lauren Stanwell (PT) Leisa Johns (PT) MillinaSavann (OT) Nicole Austin (PT) Sutherland Hospital Alex Piepers (PT) Deanne Miro (PT) Elise Klumpes-Grant (OT) Genna O’Neill (OT) Michelle Reed (OT) Special Thanks Stephanie Ho (consumer rep & steering committee member) OT and Physiotherapy Department Managers – Prince of Wales Hospital, St George Hospital, Sutherland Hospital Claire O’Connor – Director of Allied Health SESLHD Rehabilitation Physicians – Prince of Wales Hospital, St George Hospital, Sutherland Hospital Physio and OT students, 2018-2019 (ACU and Macquarie University) Deirdre Cooke (ACU Brisbane), Lauren Christie (Liverpool Hospital), Lauren Rutzou (St Joseph’s Hospital), Phillip Fay (Constraint Induced Therapy Australia)

  6. Outcome • Development • CIMT structure • Identify clinicians and run CIMT course • Resources developed • Dates set, students requested • Student orientation program and tutorials • Participants identified • Intranet and internet sites SESLHD website: https://www.seslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/services-clinics/directory/constraint-induced-movement-therapy-cimt

  7. Outcome • 5 programs run in 2018/19 – 28 participants • 6 patients: 6 students: 2 clinicians • Participant demographics

  8. Assessments • Motor Assessment Scale – Upper limb items • Box and Block test • Nine hole peg test • Motor Activity Log • Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

  9. Results Average change of 2.52 points on 18 point scale

  10. Results Average increase in blocks transferred in 1 minute - 5.26 Average reduction of time taken to complete test - 17.44 seconds

  11. Results Average rating increased by 1.26 points on a 5 point scale Average rating increased by 1.42 points on a 5 point scale

  12. Results Average increase in rating was 2.21 points Average increase in rating was 2.74 points

  13. Outcome • Student program

  14. Outcome • Comparing models 24 hours of clinician time per patient 52 hours of clinician time per patient

  15. Outcome • Comparing models $2166 per patient $979 per patient

  16. Outcome • Comparing models

  17. Outcome Delivering CIMT to 6 patients Time saving = 167 hours of clinician time Cost saving = $7122

  18. Conclusion • A student assisted model of CIMT delivery to a group is feasible • Less impact on clinician time • Reduced cost to the organisation • Participant results are good

  19. Questions? Contact Details: Jessica Worton Email: jessica.worton@health.nsw.gov.au Phone: 9113 2395 References Chen, H.M., Chen, C.C., Hsueh, I., Huang, S., Hseih, C. (2009). Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of five hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(5), 435-440. Law, M., Baptiste, S., et al. (2004). COPM questions and answers. From http://caot.ca/copm/questions.html Simpson, L.A., & Eng, J.J. (2013). Functional recovery following stroke: Capturing changes in upper extremity function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 27(3), 240-250. Stroke Foundation (2017). Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from https://app.magicapp.org/app#/guideline/2282 Wolf, S.L., Thompson, P.A., Winstein, C.J, Miller, J.P, Blanton, S.R., Nicols-Larsen, D.S., Morris, D.M., Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Light, K.E, & Sawaki, L. (2010). The EXCITE Stroke Trial Comparing Early and Delayed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Stroke, 41, 2309-2315. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588723

More Related