1 / 17

by Kousar Taj

A Seminar Paper on LITERATURE REVIEW. by Kousar Taj. Definition of a Literature Review. A literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources

shalom
Download Presentation

by Kousar Taj

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Seminar Paper on LITERATURE REVIEW • by • KousarTaj

  2. Definition of a Literature Review • A literature review • surveys scholarly articles, books and • other sources • (e.g. dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory. • provides a short description and • critical evaluation of work critical to • the topic. • offers an overview of significant • literature published on a topic. • cont…

  3. What is a Literature Review? • It is a process of gathering information from other • sources and documenting it. • Precursor in the introduction of a research paper. • It can be an entire paper in itself. • Critical and in depth evaluation of previous • research. • Summary and synopsis of a particular area of • research. • Expands upon the reasons behind selecting a • particular research question. • cont…

  4. Conducting a Literature Review • Begin research in an academic library. • Journals found in academic library can be • regarded as safe and credible. • Use the Internet • Structure the Internet research. • Bookmark papers, in one folder and make • another subfolder for a ‘short list’. • cont…

  5. Scanning the work, using the abstract and • introduction as guides. • Critically evaluate the paper and decide if • the research is sufficient quality. • Check into the credentials of any source. • Look for agreements. • cont…

  6. Literature Search • Perform a preliminary search of the literature. • Search literature to see what other work in the area of interest has already been published. • Gives a preview of the number of articles available on the topic. • If your topic is already written about, select a slightly different topic or modify the focus of the objective. • Recent journal issues in areas central to the topic may provide leads to content that should be in the review. • Consult Web of Science’s Journal Citation Index for an idea of the most important journals in the field • Develop a list of subject headings that relate to themes of interest cont…

  7. Search across multiple databases and information resources. • It’s not adequate to use Medline as your one and only resource • Read the literature throughout the search process. • What you read will guide your subsequent searches and refine your topic. • Your search should help refine the topic and objective of the overview being written. • cont…

  8. Read the Material Closer • Step 1: Read the abstract • Decide whether to read the article in detail • Step 2: Read introduction • It explains why the study is important • It provides review and evaluation of relevant literature • Step 3: Read Method with a close, critical eye • Focus on participants, measures, procedures • Step 4: Evaluate results • Do the conclusions seem logical • Can you detect any bias on the part of the researcher? • Step 5: Take discussion with a grain of salt • Edges are smoothed out • Pay attention to limitations • cont…

  9. Quality of published work • Look critically at any published work. • The fact that something has been published does not mean • the findings are automatically trust worthy. • Most trust worthy conclusions are those reached in • double blind randomized controlled trials with a • representative sample of sufficient size to detect the • smallest worthwhile effects. • cont…

  10. Weakest findings are those from case studies. • How subjects were sampled is an important • issue. • Look at the key original papers cited in any • earlier reviews. • Judge yourself whether the conclusions of the • reviews are justified. • cont…

  11. Organization of literature review • Ageneral organization looks like a funnel • Broader topics • Subtopics • Studies like yours • cont…

  12. Organization of literature review • Introduction to the lit review • Content - what is covered • Structure - how it is organized • Boundaries - what is outside of its scope • SECTION 1 • The most important topic or a key concept • discussed and evaluated • summarized and related to your research project • Conclusion • From each of the section summaries, • highlight the most relevant points • relate these back to the need for research • reiterate what these mean for the research design • cont…

  13. How to write a Literature Review • Avoid technical terms. • Avoid abbreviations. • Use simple sentences. • Avoid common errors of punctuation and • grammer. • Use the first person (I, we) rather than the • passive voice. • Link your ideas into a sensible sequence without • repetitions or discontinuities. • Get feedback on your article form colleagues. cont…

  14. Check List. • Check these before you submit your review. • The Summary is no longer than 300 • words(including subheading words). • The Summary includes real data and • magnitudes of effects. • The content of each section is appropriate to • the section. • Perform a spelling check in the language • appropriate for the journal. • References are in the style required by the • journal. Cont…

  15. Example :

  16. Keywords: Use of BIBLIOMETRICS, SCIENTOMETRICS, INFORMETRICS In LIS Research The authors have made a comparative analysis of research hot-spots in medical information in China in different periods of time using the co-words cluster analysis method of high frequency key words with the key words of papers published in Journal of Medical Informatics and Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science. Results show that the research hot-spots were medical information service, medical library service, medical journal and literature retrieval before 1990, assessment of literature novelty and medical literature retrieval with medical information service weakened in 1991-2000, and networking, digitalization, quantification and personalization with insufficient research in medical information theories and methods from 2001 which should be strengthened. Bibliographical references Li, Xiao-tao., Liu, Yan., Liu, Ya-min & Du, Hua-rong. (2011). Research Heat-Spots Published in Different Periods of Time of the Two Major Medical Library and Information Science Journals of China: A Comparative Analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 20(1), 10 – 14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest. com/docview/870996217?accountid=27563

More Related