1 / 28

Early Failure of a Modular Hip Implant

Case Study. Early Failure of a Modular Hip Implant. Summary of Failed S-ROM Prosthesis. Total hip implant failed after six months in vivo. Patient (male, 60 yrs in age) indicated symptoms of pain and device failure to his surgeon.

shana
Download Presentation

Early Failure of a Modular Hip Implant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Case Study Early Failure of a Modular Hip Implant

  2. Summary of Failed S-ROM Prosthesis • Total hip implant failed after six months in vivo. • Patient (male, 60 yrs in age) indicated symptoms of pain and device failure to his surgeon. • Howmedica SROM with a 42 mm neck and a 28 mm head. A +12mm skirt was used in this device. The acetabular liner was a Howmedica polyethylene shell with a 20mm inside diameter and a 54mm outside diameter. • Upon retrieval, the surgeon noted a large amount of white fluid with black particulate in the hip joint. The surgeon noted that there was a substantial amount of corrosion at the Morse taper and that it had a burnished appearance.

  3. Typical Failure Analysis • How is a failure analysis conducted? • Collect medical report. Histological analysis and x-rays. What materials and design used? • Visual observation of device. Note any irregularities. • Optical micrographs to capture all damage on device. Comparison to pristine device. • Chemical and mechanical analysis. • Scanning electron microscopy to look for micromechanisms of fracture.

  4. Failure Analysis • Once the failed device was explanted it was documented with both optical and electron microscopy. • Clear evidence of burnishing, pitting, and crevice corrosion were present on the device. Especially prevalent in the region of the Morse taper. • Scanning electron microscopy of the retrieval revealed intergranular attack and pitting associated with crevice corrosion and burnishing or scratching indicative of micromotion or fretting.

  5. Burnishing/ Fretting

  6. Burnishing/Fretting Corrosion

  7. SEM Analysis of Taper Intergranular attack

  8. Scientific Assessment • Fretting • Initial tolerance mismatch • stresses associated with the long neck (+12 mm neck) • Devices exceeding designed tolerances can lead to poor mechanical stability and may disrupt the interference fit required for long term structural integrity at the taper (Jacobs et al. 1998) • Brown et al. (1995) has shown a correlation between neck extension and fretting corrosion. Longer necks contribute to higher bending moments and enhance relative motion between the head and stem. It is postulated that fretting leads to a continuous passive film breakdown and repassivaton leading to oxygen consumption within the crevice. • The fractography of the failed device exhibits burnishing (associated with fretting), an etched microstructure associated with low pH, and pitting associated with crevice corrosion.

  9. Possible solutions • Possible alternatives to prevent corrosion in Co-Cr heads coupled with Ti stems: (I) use hardened Ti head on Ti stem (II) use a cobalt-on-cobalt system (III) use a ceramic head on Ti or Co stem (IV) eliminate fluid from tapered interface (V) use self-locking mechanism to prevent fretting

  10. Important Elements of the Case • Corrosion occurs in all metal implants(Jacobs et al, JBJS, 1998). • Corrosion is more prevalent in modular devices: corrosion observed in >30% of mixed alloy head/stem combinations vs. <6% all Cobalt alloy devices(Collier et al., Clin Orthop, 1995). • Biomechanical stresses are developed at the taper junction. Serves as a source of crevice corrosion (Gilbert et al., JBMR, 1993).

  11. Orthopedic Metallic Implants

  12. Taper Junction • Source of relative motion--fretting • Bending in the cone • Bending of the long neck extension (skirt) with proximal-distal slipping • Bore angle too large • Bore angle too small

  13. Crevice corrosion • Micromotion between components results in fretting corrosion that can lead to initiation of crevice corrosion. • Metallic implants rely on passive oxide film for protection from corrosion. • Repetitive motion leads to continuous breakdown and repassivation. • Repeated breakdown consumes oxygen in crevice and results in drop in pH--crevice corrosion.

  14. Crevice Corrosion OH- O2 OH- O2 O2 OH- OH- • Found in crevices or deep, narrow flaws (mismatch of components at interface • Can arise from localized oxygen depletion and metal ion concentration gradients

  15. Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion • In the head-neck taper, tolerances are such that narrow crevices exist with fluid present • At onset of loading, interfacial shear stresses are sufficient to fracture oxide film • Unpassivated metal is exposed to initially oxygen rich fluid. Oxidation occurs--depleting oxygen in crevice fluid--increases free metal ions--which attract Cl ions-->metal chlorides • Metal chlorides react with water to form metal hydroxide and HCl--lowers pH • Cr2O3 is unstable below pH of 3-- results in active attack of CoCr alloy--etched appearance (intergranular attack)

  16. Multifactorial problem--depends on geometry, metallurgy, stresses, solution chemistry Driven by two primary factors: thermodynamic driving forces (Oxidation/Reduction) and kinetic barriers An electro-chemical attack resulting in material degradation Exacerbated by mechanical and biological attack Compromises Material Properties Mechanical Integrity Biocompatibility Aesthetics Corrosion Basics

  17. Corrosion Basics • Occurs mostly in ionic, aqueous environments • Primarily a concern for metals • Oxidation – Reduction Reaction: • Loss of metal • Become ions in solutions • Combine with other species to form compound (oxides, hydroxides) • M → Mn+ + ne- • nH+ + ne- → nH

  18. Uniform Attack • General corrosion that is evenly distributed over entire corrosion region • Rusting of iron, tarnishing of silverware • Most readily detectable (visual) and preventable (alloying)

  19. Galvanic Corrosion • Two different metals/alloys that are in close proximity in an electrolytic environment • Distinct tendencies toward oxidation • Common in orthopaedics – Modular implants • Titanium femoral stems coupled with CoCr heads M+ N+ M+ e- N+ nM = nM+ +ne- nN+ + ne- = N M+ N+ M N M+ N+ N+ Metal 1 Metal 2

  20. Crevice Corrosion OH- O2 OH- O2 O2 OH- OH- • Found in crevices or deep, narrow flaws (mismatch of components at interface • Can arise from localized oxygen depletion and metal ion concentration gradients

  21. Pitting Corrosion • Subset of Crevice Corrosion • Formation of pits: local thickness reduction • Difficult to detect O2 O2 O2 OH- OH- OH- Cl- Cl- H+ H+ M+ M+ M+ M+ Cl- Cl- H+ M+ H+ http://www.materialsengineer.com/dup%20image/corrosion%2005b.jpg

  22. Intergranular Corrosion • Preferential attack along grain boundaries • Results from localized differences in chemistry • Common in SS, nickel some Al alloys Sensitive Regions precipitates http://www.corrosionresolutions.com/example_diagnostic_photographs.htm

  23. Fretting • Wear process due to relative motions in highly loaded devices exaggerated by corrosive environment • asperities of contacting surface • Device micromotions Load Relative Motion

  24. Environmental Factors • Ion concentraion • Fluid velocities • Human Body – Conducive to Corrosion • Acidic – High ionic (H+)concentration • Aqueous (Blood, Synovium) – fluid flow • 37 C – Elevated Temperature

  25. Importance to Implants • Mechanical Properties • Enhanced risk of crack propagation and fatigue fracture • Biocompatibility – Presence of metal ions triggers enhanced foreign body response • Osteolysis, implant loosening • Blood clotting (thrombosis)

  26. Importance to Implants • Long term stability of metal implants critical for patient health & survival: • Stents • Arthoplasty • Fracture Fixation • Pacemakers

More Related