370 likes | 511 Views
Purpose. For NVAC to: Be informed and aware of key decisions and progress toward polio eradication. Support US participation in the global stockpile and response and access to mOPVSupport WHO's efforts to stop the proliferation of wild polioviruses for IPV production and program to assess safety and efficacy of Sabin-IPV Endorse plans for a NAS meeting on antiviral agents .
E N D
1. NVAC Meeting February 9-10 2005
2. Purpose For NVAC to:
Be informed and aware of key decisions and progress toward polio eradication.
Support US participation in the global stockpile and response and access to mOPV
Support WHO's efforts to stop the proliferation of wild polioviruses for IPV production and program to assess safety and efficacy of Sabin-IPV
Endorse plans for a NAS meeting on antiviral agents
3. Overview Status of global polio eradication
Post-eradication era: policies, strategies, products
4. In 1988, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution to eradicate polio globally.
At the time, over 350,000 children were paralysed by polio in more than 125 countries.
Since then, the initiative has become the largest public health initiative in history, as 20 million volunteers have been involved in immunizing over 2 billion children across the world.
Six countries in the world remain polio endemic: Nigeria, India, Pakistan, Niger, Afghanistan and Egypt. However, 5 African countries re-established polio transmission due to an imported poliovirus.In 1988, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution to eradicate polio globally.
At the time, over 350,000 children were paralysed by polio in more than 125 countries.
Since then, the initiative has become the largest public health initiative in history, as 20 million volunteers have been involved in immunizing over 2 billion children across the world.
Six countries in the world remain polio endemic: Nigeria, India, Pakistan, Niger, Afghanistan and Egypt. However, 5 African countries re-established polio transmission due to an imported poliovirus.
5. Reported Polio Cases'Comparison of 2002–2004* In the past year Asia and the Middle east nearly halved its numbers of polio cases from 330 in 2003 to 187 in 2004 (at 25 January 2005):
(132 cases in India, 50 in Pakistan and 4 in Afghanistan, 1 importation saudi arabia).
Polio transmission in Asia is now limited to just six of 51 major geographic areas (i.e. state, province or region).
However, a large outbreak in Africa has created a major challengeIn the past year Asia and the Middle east nearly halved its numbers of polio cases from 330 in 2003 to 187 in 2004 (at 25 January 2005):
(132 cases in India, 50 in Pakistan and 4 in Afghanistan, 1 importation saudi arabia).
Polio transmission in Asia is now limited to just six of 51 major geographic areas (i.e. state, province or region).
However, a large outbreak in Africa has created a major challenge
6. Impact of 'Intensification', AsiaFocal Transmission in 2004 Pakistan: 8 large-scale SIAs, including 7 NIDs reaching 33 million children each time and 1 SNID reaching 16 million children.
Afghanistan: 8 large-scale SIAs, including 4 NIDs reaching 7 million children each time, 2 SNIDs reaching 5 million children each time, and 2 mop-ups.
India: 8 large-scale Supplementary Immunization Activities (SIAs), including 5 National Immunization Days (NIDs) reaching 170 million children each time; 1 Subnational Immunization Day (SNID) reaching 130 million children; and 2 mop-up campaigns in the highest-risk areas reaching 84 million children each time. India in particular has made much progress toward polio eradication in 2004. fewest # of cases ever.
In sum, Asia now has the best opportunity ever to interrupt transmission of wild poliovirus in 2005. The fullest commitment of political and health leaders at all levels is needed to reach every child during upcoming polio campaigns Pakistan: 8 large-scale SIAs, including 7 NIDs reaching 33 million children each time and 1 SNID reaching 16 million children.
Afghanistan: 8 large-scale SIAs, including 4 NIDs reaching 7 million children each time, 2 SNIDs reaching 5 million children each time, and 2 mop-ups.
India: 8 large-scale Supplementary Immunization Activities (SIAs), including 5 National Immunization Days (NIDs) reaching 170 million children each time; 1 Subnational Immunization Day (SNID) reaching 130 million children; and 2 mop-up campaigns in the highest-risk areas reaching 84 million children each time. India in particular has made much progress toward polio eradication in 2004. fewest # of cases ever.
In sum, Asia now has the best opportunity ever to interrupt transmission of wild poliovirus in 2005. The fullest commitment of political and health leaders at all levels is needed to reach every child during upcoming polio campaigns
7. Challenge: tenacious viral transmission and ‘fatigue’ (public and staff)
Planned response:
Use of type 1 monovalent OPV in Egypt and parts of India by May 2005
‘Underserved’ strategy
Integration with other interventions Prospects – Asia & Egypt Polio partners and vaccine manufacturers started development of a monovalent oral polio vaccine (type-1), to accelerate the interruption of wild poliovirus transmission in Egypt and parts of India. Seroconverson rates after 1 dose of mOPV are approximately double that of trivalent OPV. Polio partners and vaccine manufacturers started development of a monovalent oral polio vaccine (type-1), to accelerate the interruption of wild poliovirus transmission in Egypt and parts of India. Seroconverson rates after 1 dose of mOPV are approximately double that of trivalent OPV.
8. Impact of OPV Suspension, NigeriaPoliovirus Spread, 2004 In Africa, a polio epidemic spread from northern Nigeria to a total of 13 previously polio-free countries in 2003-2004. In Burkina Faso, the Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire and the Sudan, poliovirus transmission was re-established (i.e. the imported poliovirus circulated for over six months following initial importations).
The epidemic was caused by the suspension of immunization activities in northern Nigeria and exacerbated by low population immunity levels in neighbouring countries. Following the resumption of polio immunization activities on 31 July in Kano, Nigeria, large, synchronized campaigns were conducted across 23 countries in west and central Africa, reaching more than 80 million children each time.
The major country risks include Nigeria and Niger (where polio transmission has never been stopped), the Sudan (where the late 2004 outbreak threatens the polio-free status of Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Côte d'Ivoire (where immunization activities have not resumed following civil unrest in November 2004). In Africa, a polio epidemic spread from northern Nigeria to a total of 13 previously polio-free countries in 2003-2004. In Burkina Faso, the Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire and the Sudan, poliovirus transmission was re-established (i.e. the imported poliovirus circulated for over six months following initial importations).
The epidemic was caused by the suspension of immunization activities in northern Nigeria and exacerbated by low population immunity levels in neighbouring countries. Following the resumption of polio immunization activities on 31 July in Kano, Nigeria, large, synchronized campaigns were conducted across 23 countries in west and central Africa, reaching more than 80 million children each time.
The major country risks include Nigeria and Niger (where polio transmission has never been stopped), the Sudan (where the late 2004 outbreak threatens the polio-free status of Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Côte d'Ivoire (where immunization activities have not resumed following civil unrest in November 2004).
9. Summary India & Egypt: will intensify activities & add mOPV1 to stop polio during the 2005 low season.
10. Post-OPV Cessation Policies/Products
11. Priority of Post-OPV Cessation Planning ".. to manage the risk of paralytic disease caused by any polioviruses among current and future generations of children."*
[Elimination of risk not possible!]
*WER 2004;39:349-355.
13. iVDPV & Long-Term Excretion: WHO Registry 24 iVDPVs, including 22 long term excretors
2 currently known to excrete
7 type 1, 16 type 2, 1 type 3
cases have been from: Europe (9), USA (7), Japan (1), Argentina (1), Kuwait (1), Taiwan (1), Iran (1), Ireland/Zimbabwe (1), Thailand (1)
14. Risks of Polio After 'Eradication'
15. Policy Decision Cessation of OPV for routine immunization
Consensus of September 2003 (endorsed in September 2004) meeting
Risks > benefits in absence of wild poliovirus
Expectation of countries and stakeholders
High opportunity & financial costs of continued OPV.
16. Prerequisites for OPV Cessation Appropriate containment of all polioviruses.
Global surveillance & notification capacity.
mOPV stockpile & response mechanism.
Coordinated cessation of OPV.
'Post OPV' immunization policy in place.
17. Routine Immunization Policy Discontinue OPV (as recommended)
Remaining options:
Discontinue all polio vaccination
Replace OPV with IPV (country, region or globally)
Develop a new polio vaccine
18. Polio Vaccine Use Worldwide, 2004
19. Current WHO Statement on IPV
20. Products Pursued & Rationale I mOPV
Finish eradication in most difficult areas (anticipate licensure in Spring 2005 for mOPV1)
Serve as principle stockpile vaccine
Antivirals
Clear chronic excretion among long-term excretors
Available for post-exposure prophylaxis
Option for outbreak control (example: pandemic flu)
21. Sabin-IPV
Facilitate containment
Serve as "warm-base" for restart OPV production
Minimize the proliferation of new wild poliovirus amplification sites
Facilitate the replacement of all wild poliovirus in vaccine production (longterm objective)
“The AACPE (AdHoc Advisory Committee on Polio Eradication) is encouraged by the prospect of a potentially effective IPV using Sabin poliovirus strains, and urges acceleration of studies to demonstrate safety and protective efficacy.…” (WER 2004, 79,401-8)
Products Pursued & Rationale II
22. Timelines depend primarily on interruption of wild poliovirus.
Policy directions will be reviewed as new data becomes available.
23. Schematic: Risks & Timelines Main Risk
Years after last wpv
Containment
Vaccines
Surveillance
24. Summary/Conclusions OPV cessation prerequisite for maintaining eradication, elements:
Poliovirus detection & notification
Stockpile & emergency response
Long-term containment
National immunization policy decisions
Key is to manage the risks (no ‘risk free’ option)
25. Purpose For NVAC to:
Be informed and aware of key decisions and progress toward polio eradication.
Support US participation in the global stockpile & response and access to mOPV
Support WHO's efforts to stop the proliferation of wild polioviruses for IPV production and program to assess safety and efficacy of Sabin-IPV
Endorse plans for a NAS meeting on antiviral agents
26. THANK YOU!
27. EXTRA Slides-Polio Eradication Status
28. Selected Key Milestones Short-term (24 months):
License monovalent OPV & establish response mechanism.
Limit sites of wild poliovirus amplification (incl. IPV sites).
Consensus on long-term containment (GAP ed. III).
Introduce 'National Guidelines for OPV Cessation'.
Medium term (24-60 months):
Align surveillance/diagnostics with that of dangerous pathogens.
Long-term:
Promote use of Sabin strains only for IPV manufacture.
29. Ongoing Work Risks measurement & management
iVDPVs: prevalence, re-introduction risk, clearance strategies (IgG, antivirals)
cVDPV: define highest risk areas & potential strategies (e.g. limited pulses, IPV)
IPV sites: define biosecurity 'gains' with Sabin; for new producers
Lab stocks: verify survey/inventory process;
Stockpiles: size of mOPV stockpiles; role of IPV; restart capacity (5 year period)
IPV introduction
define country expectations re future polio immunization
model impact (esp. in terms of cVDPV emergence)
determine whether specific conditions warrant a WHO IPV recommendation
protective efficacy of Sabin-IPV
30. Potential World Health Assembly Resolutions (May 2005) OPV Cessation: consensus on globally coordinated OPV cessation as key goal of the eradication initiative.
Containment (future handling of polioviruses): consensus on need for safe storage at secure biosafety levels for Sabin, vaccine-derived & wild polioviruses after OPV cessation.
Outbreak Response (reintroduction of polioviruses): consensus on the need for vaccine stockpile and international controls, & mechanism for responding to polio outbreak should one occur.
31. Framework for National Guidelines for OPV Cessation Rationale for OPV Cessation
Containment activities for OPV Cessation
Surveillance before, during & after OPV Cessation
Stopping routine use of OPV
Polio vaccine stockpiles & outbreak response
Implications of IPV introduction
32. Summary/Conclusions II Prevention of wild poliovirus amplification sites of paramount importance
Development of mOPV, antiviral agents, and Sabin-IPV is integral part of post-OPV cessation planning
33. Show me the money….for 2005-2008 2005
Financial Resource Requirements: $ 615m
Contributions (Received/Projected): $ 515m
Funding Gap: $ 100m
2006-2008
Financial Resource Requirements: $ 805m
Stockpile: $ 250m
34. Sudan as of 18 Jan 05
35. Challenge:
largest outbreak in recent history.
Suspension of activities in Cote d’Ivoire
Low population immunity in affected areas
Possible spread to Ethiopia, DRC and other parts of E. Africa
Response:
New WHO/UNICEF team in Nigeria
Improved NID quality
Improved AFP surveillance
Involvement of religious and local leaders Prospects – Africa
36. Challenges Funding gap – G8 and new donors
Gaps in quality – both SIAs and surveillance
Security/conflicts – polio ceasefires
Burnout – recognition, incentives, staff support
Political commitment, particularly in India, Pakistan and Egypt
37. Conclusions and Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on Poliomyelitis Eradication, 21-22 Sept, 2004 Interrupting WPV transmission
Global program priorities
Enhancing the impact of SIAs
Measures to limit the international spread of wild poliovirus
Plans for globally coordinated cessation of use of OPV
38. Overview Overriding priority
Risks of poliovirus infection
Policy decision
Prerequisites
Products pursued & rationale
Summary & conclusions