1 / 16

Main Title

Main Title. White Hat Bias: Truthful Reporting of Scientific Data. Mark B Cope, PhD Global Nutrition, Solae, LLC. Cope MB and Allison DB. Acta Paediatr 2010 99(11): 1615-7. JAMA 2010 303(20): 2058-64. Pharm Stats, 2011. Where do we see White Hat Bias?.

shania
Download Presentation

Main Title

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Main Title

  2. White Hat Bias: Truthful Reporting of Scientific Data Mark B Cope, PhD Global Nutrition, Solae, LLC

  3. Cope MB and Allison DB Acta Paediatr 2010 99(11): 1615-7. JAMA 2010 303(20): 2058-64. Pharm Stats, 2011

  4. Where do we see White Hat Bias? • Citing Results from Previous Publications Inaccurately • Miscommunications in the Media • especially headlines • Publication Bias-Published Based on Outcome • Inappropriate Inclusion/Exclusion of Information in Literature Reviews

  5. Citing Results from Previous Publications Inaccurately No significant change in BMI; fewer children in intervention group were obese at the end of the intervention (84% cited only the positive outcome; 12% were accurate; and 4% cited only the non-significant)

  6. James et al. Paper “After 12 months there was no significant change in the difference in body mass index (mean difference 0.13, -0.08 to 0.34) or z score (0.04, -0.04 to 0.12).” Press Release “Discouraging children from drinking fizzy drinks can prevent excessive weight gain, according to new research available on bmj.com.” Miscommunications in the press-especially headlines

  7. Publication Bias-published based on outcome • Tailoring reported results to intended message to increase chance of getting published • Omitting neutral results in order to publish sensational data Cope MB and Allison DB. Obesity Rev, 2008; 9:594-605

  8. Inappropriate Inclusion/Exclusion of Information • Evidence-based reviews can be biased • Selection of peer-reviewed articles to support a specific message • Use of partial data from previous work…only using what “fits the story” Cope MB and Allison DB. Obesity Rev, 2008; 9:594-605

  9. vs • Authors address an issue with different methods • Silo effect (one case study) • Martinez, J. and J. E. Lewi (2008). "An unusual case of gynecomastia associated with soy product consumption." Endocr Pract14(4): 415-418. • Totality of evidence • Perry, D. L., J. M. Spedick, et al. (2007). "Dietary soy protein containing isoflavonoids does not adversely affect the reproductive tract of male cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis)." J Nutr137(6): 1390-1394. • Giampietro, P. G., G. Bruno, et al. (2004). "Soy protein formulas in children: no hormonal effects in long-term feeding." J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab17(2): 191-196. • Kurzer, M. S. (2002). "Hormonal effects of soy in premenopausal women and men." J Nutr132(3): 570S-573S.

  10. Is This the Most Dangerous Food for Men?By Jim Thornton, Posted Date: May 19, 2009 • “All-natural protein” is often code for soy, which research shows may cause gynecomastia—the abnormal enlargement of the mammary glands in men. When you consume soy protein, you’re actually courting the Mr. Hyde side of two organic compounds: genistein and daidzein. Both act so similarly to estrogen that they’re known as phytoestrogens (plant produced estrogen). Eat enough of the stuff, and you open up the potential for hormonal havoc.” • -Men’s Health (http://www.menshealth.com/nutrition/soys-negative-effects/page/2) • “The condition (gynecomastia) can be brought on by obesity, excessive alcohol, pot smoking, and steroids—in other words, by simply acting stupid.” • -Men’s Health (http://www.menshealth.com/health/roid-rage)

  11. Does Soy Really Cause Man Boobs? Dr. Steve • “I should point out that searching "soy and gynecomastia" in the National Institute of Health database only spews out three articles, but you'll be happy to know that the reproductive tracts of male macaques were not adversely affected by ingesting soy. There is one interesting case report of a 60-year-old man who developed big ol' hooters and presented to a gland clinic for an answer. His gynecomastia eventually went away when they discovered he was drinking 3/4 of a GALLON of soy milk A DAY and told him to cut it out. With all the millions of people who ingest soy daily (there are countries where soy is a staple of the "normal" diet) the fact that there is one case report of one guy whose breast tissue was sensitive to soy products is reassuring to me.” • -Men’s Fitness(http://www.mensfitness.com/nutrition/abs-health/does-soy-really-cause-man-boobs)

  12. 2009 Soy Protein Does Not Lower Testosterone 15 placebo-controlled treatment groups were included in this meta-analysis “The results of this meta-analysis indicate that neither soy protein nor isoflavones affect reproductive hormone concentrations in men regardless of age or cancer status.”

  13. What We Can Do That Will Plausibly Improve Scientific Rigor? Emphasize the idea of science as a discipline and vocation. Develop a culture that unequivocally condemns personal attacks in science. Develop a set of ‘meta-methods’ which will collectively ensure the implementation of the fundamental scientific methods that already exist.

  14. More Good News! The Glass is More Than Half Full… • Scientific method is a Bias Reduction Technique • Ethics is an integral part of scientific training • Primary research methods are improving • Reporting standards are increasingly used and formalized • Evidence-based reviews are increasingly used and formalized • Trial registration and public data depositing are becoming more common.

  15. Conclusion • WHB is an issue within the scientific community and it is not isolated to any one particular group (academia, media, industry). • Methods are being developed to help reduce the amount of bias • Scientist, clinicians, educators, media, public health policy makers, and the public should be cognizant of WHB and closely evaluate literature and press releases more critically.

  16. Thank You!

More Related