400 likes | 411 Views
Explore the role of counties in providing a range of services, including human services and criminal justice. Learn about the impact of Proposition 13 and other legislative changes on county finances, and the unique financial issues faced by Sacramento County. Discover the challenges of balancing the county budget and allocating resources.
E N D
County Services • Counties provide some services on a countywide basis • Human services • Criminal justice services • Property tax collection • Other services • Counties provide municipal services to unincorporated areas
Countywide Services • Human services • Welfare • CalWorks -- TANF • Foster Care • General Assistance • Public health • Mental health • Protective services
Countywide Services cont. • Criminal Justice • Jails • Prosecution • Public defense • Probation • field services • juvenile institutions • court reports
County Municipal Services • Local police protection -- Sheriff • Public works • Local Parks • Fire protection • Some services may be provided by special districts
Prop13 to Now Historical Perspective
Role of Legislative Body • In American system only the legislative body (Congress, Legislature, Board, or Council) can: • Levy taxes • Appropriate proceeds of taxes • Approve spending authority for Executive
Counties before 1978 • Board of Supervisors used to set a countywide property tax rate to fund countywide services • Counties had a greater share of the costs of human services programs • VLF was a much less significant revenue source
Pre Prop 13 Relationship of Taxes & Spending • Board of Supervisors had discretion over property tax rate & property tax revenue • There was a political balance between taxing and spending. • An elected official could gain political credit for keeping tax rates down
Prop 13 & Aftermath • Property tax rate reduce to 1% • Base growth capped at 2% • System forced to use growth to maintain base spending • AB 8 & SB 54 • Shift of property taxes from schools to local government • State assumes greater share of human services
The Fix Unravels1991-1993 • The state’s support of local government was withdrawn in the early 1990s • Realignment -- share of sales tax & VLF replace shares of support for human service programs • MOE required • Base level of funding not reached for 3 years
ERAF • Education Relief Augmentation Fund • Undoing of AB 8 bailout by shifting property tax revenue from local government to schools • Partial backfill for counties & cities from Proposition 172 Public Safety Sales Tax • How wild fires saved local government
ERAF -- Sacto County • The ERAF legislation caused the shift 1/2 of Sacramento County’s current property tax revenues • 1993-94 $ 95 million • 2001-02 $ 126.7 million • Prop 172 backfill of 1/2 to 1/3 of total • Annual loss of $40 million to $50 million
Growth in the 1990s • The long economic boom of the late 1990s covered over structural problems of county finance • Income tax revenue grew faster than property taxes, sales tax, & VLF • Availability of state & federal funding • VLF rate reductions & backfill
Current Situation • Counties facing fiscal challenges due to slowing economy • Sales tax absolute reductions hit Realignment & Prop 172 revenue • MOE requirements not changed • Human service & criminal justice costs increase when economy slows • Significant problems without state actions
Countywide Revenues • Direct program support for human services & criminal justice • Welfare reimbursements • Statewide pool revenue • Realignment • Proposition 172 Public Safety • Fees & charges • General purpose financing
Municipal Financing • Sales tax • Franchise fees • Utility tax • Business license tax • Fees • Property tax (county fire, park, & library districts)
Unique Nature of Sacramento County • Large urban Unincorporated Area with over 50% of county population • Significant sales tax base • Service responsibility • Sheriff • Public Works • Tension & conflict between countywide & municipal responsibilities
Budget Priorities • Funding mandates • County shares of state & federal programs • Honoring contracts • County workforce • Debt • Political priorities • Some are more equal than others
County Budget Dilemma • A county budget is tied to local & statewide economy • There is an inverse, or counter-cyclical relationship between revenue growth & human services & criminal justice program caseloads • When business is good, then revenues are bad
Requirement Appropriations Reserve contributions Financing Fund Balance Revenues Reserve releases Balancing the General Fund -- Theory
Balancing the General Fund -- Reality • Net cost of programs is determined & compared to general purpose financing • Net cost is equal to program expenditures less program revenues • General purpose financing is not linked to specific programs or groups of programs • No link between program net cost & availability of general purpose financing
Current County Financial Issues Incorporations & Annexations Retirement Benefit Enhancements
Incorporation • Formation of new city from portion of the Unincorporated Area • County issues • Regional governance • Fiscal impacts • Workforce impacts
Incorporation Fiscal Issues • Transfer of municipal service responsibility & municipal revenues • Balance between cost transfer & revenue transfer • Revenue neutrality • State law requires payments back • Negotiated structure • Securing payments
Annexation • Growth of existing cities • Transfer of municipal service responsibility & municipal revenues • Property tax exchange agreements required • Negotiations with entity that may enter into a binding & enforceable contract
Retirement Enhancements • Issue of increasing retirement benefit for public employees • Issues • Fiscal • Ethical • Workforce dislocation
Retirement Fiscal Issues • Defined benefit plans • Increasing benefits creates an unfunded liability for retirement systems • Employer, not employees, responsible for additional cost • $ 54 million for Sacramento County • Offsets