1 / 28

RESULTS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR MANDATE PRIORITIZATION

Presentation of results and proposed approach on the application of methodology for mandate prioritization, including analysis by pillars and strategic vision alignment.

shari
Download Presentation

RESULTS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR MANDATE PRIORITIZATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RESULTS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR MANDATE PRIORITIZATION Determining the Overarching Factor

  2. INSTALLED IMPACT MANDATES % CAPACITY Meet criteria 7 8.6% Intermediate 13 16.0% Very High Low 6 7.4% Very Low 1 1.2% High 9 11.1% Intermediate 17 21.0% High Low 7 8.6% Very Low 1 1.2% High 4.9% Intermediate 5 6.2% Intermediate Low 3 3.7% Very Low 1 1.2% Low Low 4 4.9% Fulfilled/NA 3.7% TOTAL 81 100.0% Results of the Application of the Mandate Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) 33 mandates 4 40%

  3. PILLAR MANDATES % DEMOCRACY 2 6.1% HUMAN RIGHTS 5 15.2% INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT 11 33.3% MULTIDIMENSIONAL SECURITY 13 39.4% INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING 2 6.1% TOTAL 33 100.0% Results of the Application of the Mandate Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair)

  4. Mandate Priorization Exercise (Thematic grouping)

  5. Mandate Priorization

  6. Mandate Priorization

  7. Proposal of the Chair

  8. Proposal of the Chair • In the opinion of the Chair, although the results produced by the application of the mandate prioritization methodology approved by the Permanent Council are technically sound, founded as they are on objective and neutral measurements and assessments, they do not conform to political guidelines followed by the Organization. • In that regard, while the Chair recognizes that this process has been long and, at times, complicated, nevertheless, so far, the agreed-upon approach has been not to discard mandates per se, but to screen them out because they are duplicates, have been superseded, or do not qualify as mandates; or else to classify them by their contents (A, B, and C). • Accordingly, the Chair would like to propose the following approach: • Take the first criterion in the mandate prioritization methodology as the starting point; in other words, the mandates identified as contributing to the fulfillment of the Strategic Vision (81 mandates). • Go back to the “Strategic Vision Road Map,” which was used as a working tool and guide for the first stages of the Strategic Vision process. • Combine the 81 mandates selected using the methodology with the other components of the Strategic Vision, in order to use them, with the approval of the Permanent Council, as inputs in drafting the four-year strategic plans.

  9. Distribution of mandates by pillar before the application of the Overarching Factor Notes: Mandates 104 and 122 are duplicated, hence mandate 122 was eliminated Mandates 50 and 61 have been reallocated in the Pillar of Management, originally found in the Pillar of Institutional Strengthening

  10. “The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to the strengthening of democracy, the promotion and protection of human rights, the advancement of integral development, and the fostering of multidimensional security, all equal and interdependent, with justice and social inclusion, for the benefit of the peoples of the Americas” Vision Human Rights Integral Development Multidimensional Security Administration Institutional Strengthening Strategic Objectives Democracy Strategic Guidelines Mandates Work Plans (Organizational Structure) Operative Goals Budget Appropriation • Program • Sub-program

  11. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) PILLAR: DEMOCRACY         STRATEGIC VISION : "The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to the STRENGTHENING OF DEMOCRACY..."

  12. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) 1/2 PILLAR: HUMAN RIGHTSSTRATEGIC VISION: "The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to…..the PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS…"

  13. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) 2/2 PILLAR: HUMAN RIGHTSSTRATEGIC VISION : "The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to…..the PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS…"

  14. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) 1/2 PILLAR: INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC VISION "The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to ... the ADVANCEMENT OF INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT…"

  15. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) 2/2 PILLAR: INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC VISION "The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to ... the ADVANCEMENT OF INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT…"

  16. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) 1/2 PILLAR: MULTIDIMENSIONAL SECURITY STRATEGIC VISION: "The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to... the FOSTERING OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL SECURITY…"

  17. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) 2/2 PILLAR: MULTIDIMENSIONAL SECURITY STRATEGIC VISION: "The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to... the FOSTERING OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL SECURITY…"

  18. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) PILLAR: INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING

  19. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) PILLAR: ADMINISTRATION

  20. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) Pillar: DEMOCRACY

  21. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) Pillar: DEMOCRACY

  22. Political assessment for the Prioritization Methodology (Proposal of the Chair) Pillar: DEMOCRACY

  23. “The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to the strengthening of democracy, the promotion and protection of human rights, the advancement of integral development, and the fostering of multidimensional security, all equal and interdependent, with justice and social inclusion, for the benefit of the peoples of the Americas” Vision Human Rights Integral Development Administration Multidimensional Security Institutional Strengthening Pillars Democracy Strategic Objectives 4 3 5 3 3 3 Strategic Guidelines 2 3 7 5 5 2 21 10 33 9 Mandates 4 3

  24. Proposed Thematic Areas Institutional Strengthening DEMOCRACY Support to Electoral Processes Support to sustainable democracy Protective Measures and Follow-up of cases Human Rights Support to promotion and protection policies

  25. Proposed Thematic Areas Innovation and Competitiveness Tourism Labor Social Development Integral Development Science and Technology Sustainable Development Human Development Education and Culture

  26. Proposed Thematic Areas Defense Public Security MULTIDIMENSIONAL SECURITY Drug Abuse Control Fight Against Terrorism Fight against transnational organized crime

  27. Proposed Thematic Areas Planning and Evaluation INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING Support to participation of civil society Representation in Member States

  28. “The Organization of American States is the hemispheric political forum inclusive of all the countries of the Americas, committed to the strengthening of democracy, the promotion and protection of human rights, the advancement of integral development, and the fostering of multidimensional security, all equal and interdependent, with justice and social inclusion, for the benefit of the peoples of the Americas” Vision Multidimensional Security Human Rights Integral Development Administration Institutional Strengthening Pillars Democracy Strategic Objectives 4 3 5 3 3 3 Strategic Guidelines 2 3 7 5 5 2 21 10 33 9 Mandates 4 3 1 5 3 8 2 3 ThematicAreas FOUR-YEAR STRATEGIC PLANS

More Related