310 likes | 436 Views
Nano-meniscii. E. CHARLAIX. Université de Lyon, France. NANOFLUIDICS SUMMER SCHOOL August 20-24 2007. THE ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS. OUTLINE. Capillarity at a nanoscale : orders of magnitude. Some experiments involving nano-meniscii.
E N D
Nano-meniscii E. CHARLAIX Université de Lyon, France NANOFLUIDICS SUMMER SCHOOL August 20-24 2007 THE ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS
OUTLINE Capillarity at a nanoscale : orders of magnitude Some experiments involving nano-meniscii Measuring capillary forces with SFA experiments Intrusion-extrusion of water in mesoporous media
Micro-Nanofluidic devices Two-phase flow in nano-channels Micro-heat pipes Tas & al, Appl. Phys Lett 2004 evaporation-condensation processes in thin liquid films
Biological & environmental processes Sap in trees Transport of solute in underground Stability of soils
Material science Humidity-induceed creep in composite materials Frost heave Cracks propagation in glass
2R r q h liquid r For water: r = 1µm Pcap ~ 1 atm 1. NEGATIVE PRESSURES Laplace law of capillarity glv: l-v surface tension r: radius of mean curvature Capillary rise Jurin’s law Sap in trees….
2. HUGE CAPILLARY FORCES R • Two spheres in contact: a wetting liquid (q < 90°) forms a liquid bridge r q If r<< R : the capillary force is • vanishing amount of liquid gives macroscopic force Nanomeniscus can sustain a Ø 2mm steal bead ! Israelachvili, Molecular and Surface Forces, 1985
rK Dc RH 50% 80% 99% rK1.5nm 4.5nm 100nm 3. CAPILLARY CONDENSATION Vapor reservoir RH= PV / PSAT < 100% D Condensed state favored if if The Kelvin’s radius is the mean radius of curvature for L/V equilibrium across a curved interface
4. NUCLEATION See recent work of E. Herbert, F. Caupin, S. Balibar if
First measurement of capillary forces with nano-meniscii Surface Force Apparatus Bowden et Tabor The friction and lubrication of solids Clarendon press 1958 J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces Academic press 1985 See also Christenson & al
F D Crassous et al, Europhys Letter 1994 Surface Force Apparatus in vapor atmosphere J.L. Loubet, ECL Lyon heptane vapor metal surfaces
0 D (nm) 50 R F (µN) Classical capillarity rK = 24 nm 4π gLVR Radius of curvature of nanomeniscus is derived from F(D) curve Strong negative pressure in the liquid bridge
Pv rK 3.6 52 nm 0 20 D (nm) 60 80 100 Maximum adhesion force does not change much with LB size
rK 0 5 10 D (nm) Maximum adhesion increases slightly with increasing curvature
4π gLVR 3e 0 D (nm) 50 Capillary force with van der Waals wetting films R ASLV Hamaker constant F (µN)
Dc rK Wetting effects are important with nano-scale meniscii
Dc 0 20 D (nm) 60 80 100
Wetting-drying of hydrophobic mesoporous media Lefevre & al, J. Chem. Phys. 2004 Micelle-templated silicas Covalent grafting of silane n-octyl-dimethylchlorosilane CTAB + TMB Octadecyl triammonium bromide Trimethyl benzene Pore radius from 1.3nm to 5.6 nm
Intrusion-extrusion pressure Rp = 1.3nm Rp = 1.5nm Rp = 5.6 nm Rp = 2.3nm
intrusion drying log
Rp liquid Pliq Laplace law for intrusion pressure Classical capillarity cos qa = 120.3° advancing angle • Very good agreeement with classical capillarity up to Rp=1.3 nm • does not work for extrusion
Temperature dependance of pressure cycle Pintrusion as T : gLV(T) accounts for shift Pextrusion as T
Nucleation model for water extrusion Annular bump Wall bubble
Excess free energy for the vapor nucleus at liquid pressure PL= PV +∆p bump bubble V/R3 The bubble is more favorable
Nucleation model for water extrusion Number of critical vapor nucleus per unit time and length of pore microscopic length and time , Pore empties when
∆Wc = 190 kBT ∆Wc = 135 kBT ∆Wc = 142 kBT Activation barrier accounts for: strong variation of extrusion pressure with pore size threshold pore size for extrusion temperature dependance of extrusion pressure But: classical capillarity model gives much too high energy barrier
Nucleation model for water extrusion Number of critical vapor nucleus per unit time and length of pore microscopic length and time , Pore empties when L ~1 µm t exp ~ s
Classical capillarity accounts well for pressure drop across nano-meniscus It does not work well for estimating energy barrier of LV nucleation Heterogeneous nucleation ? (wetting defects in nanopores) Three-phase line tension effects ? (line tension of 10 -11 N decreases ∆Wc by 400%) See recent work of S. Balibar & al on homogeneous nucleation in water