E8-24

1. E8-24 The dollar-value LIFO method was adopted by Enya Corp. on January 1, 2014. Its inventory on that date was $160,000. On December 31, 2014, the inventory at prices existing on that date amounted to $140,000. The price level at January 1, 2014, was 100, and the price level at December 31, 2014, was 112. • Compute the amount of the inventory at December 31, 2014, under the dollar-value LIFO method. • On December 31, 2015, the inventory at prices existing on that date was $172,500, and the price level was 115. Compute the inventory on that date under the dollar-value LIFO method.

2. E8-24 a.

3. E8-24 b.

4. LCM Practice Decker Company has five products in its inventory. Information about the December 31, 2011, inventory follows. Unit Unit Unit Replacement Selling ProductQuantityCostCostPrice A 1,000 $10 $12 $16 B 800 15 11 18 C 600 3 2 8 D 200 7 4 6 E 600 14 12 13 The selling cost for each product consists of a 15 percent sales commission. The normal profit percentage for each product is 40 percent of the selling price. Determine the balance sheet inventory carrying value at December 31, 2011, assuming the LCM rule is applied to individual products.

5. LCM Practice

6. LCM Practice Decker Company has five products in its inventory. Information about the December 31, 2011, inventory follows. Unit Unit Unit Replacement Selling ProductQuantityCostCostPrice A 1,000 $10 $12 $16 B 800 15 11 18 C 600 3 2 8 D 200 7 4 6 E 600 14 12 13 The selling cost for each product consists of a 15 percent sales commission. The normal profit percentage for each product is 40 percent of the selling price. Determine the balance sheet inventory carrying value at December 31, 2011, assuming the LCM rule is applied to the entire inventory.

7. LCM Practice Inventory carrying value would be $30,390, the lower of aggregate inventory cost ($33,600) and aggregate inventory market ($30,390). The amount of the loss from inventory write-down is $3,210 ($33,600 – 30,390).

8. Practice: Conventional Retail Method Smith-Kline Company maintains inventory records at selling prices as well as at cost. For 2011, the records indicate the following data: Cost Retail Beginning inventory $ 80 $ 125 Purchases 671 1,006 Freight-in on purchases 30 Purchase returns 1 2 Net markups 4 Net markdowns 8 Net sales 916 Use the conventional retail method to approximate cost of ending inventory.

9. Practice: (Conventional Retail) Cost Retail Beginning inventory $ 80 $ 125 Purchases 671 1,006 Freight-in on purchases 30 Purchase returns (1) (2) Net markups 4 Goods available for sale 780 1,133 Cost-to-retail percentages: Conventional cost ratio: $780 / $1,133 = 0.6884 Deduct: Net sales (916) Net markdowns (8) Ending inventory at retail $ 209 Ending inv at cost($209 x .6884) $144

10. LIFO to FIFO Conversion – Dow Chemical LIFO FIFO 6,847 46,020 52,867 7,087 45,780

11. E10-25 On April 1, 2012, Pavlova Company received a condemnation award of $410,000 cash as compensation for the forced sale of the company’s land and building, which stood in the path of a new state highway. The land and building cost $60,000 and $280,000, respectively, when they were acquired. At April 1, 2012, the accumulated depreciation relating to the building amounted to $160,000. On August 1, 2012, Pavlova purchased a piece of replacement property for cash. The new land cost $90,000, and the new building cost $380,000. Prepare the journal entries to record the transactions on April 1 and August 1, 2012.

12. E10-25: Continued April 1 Cash410,000 Accumulated Depreciation—Buildings 160,000 Land 60,000 Buildings 280,000 Gain on Disposal of Plant Assets 230,000 August 1 Land 90,000 Buildings 380,000 Cash 470,000

13. Example 9 On January 1, 2011, the Haskins Company adopted the dollar-value LIFO method for its one inventory pool. The pool’s value on this date was $660,000. The 2011 and 2012 ending inventory valued at year-end costs were $690,000 and $760,000, respectively. The appropriate cost indexes are 1.04 for 2011 and 1.08 for 2012. Calculate the inventory value at the end of 2011 and 2012 using the dollar-value LIFO method.

14. Example 9: Continued 2011 Ending Inventory at Base Year Cost Inventory Layers at Base Year Cost Inventory Layers Converted to Cost

15. Example 9 On January 1, 2011, the Haskins Company adopted the dollar-value LIFO method for its one inventory pool. The pool’s value on this date was $660,000. The 2011 and 2012 ending inventory valued at year-end costs were $690,000 and $760,000, respectively. The appropriate cost indexes are 1.04 for 2011 and 1.08 for 2012. Calculate the inventory value at the end of 2011 and 2012 using the dollar-value LIFO method.

16. Example 9: Continued 2012 Ending Inventory at Base Year Cost Inventory Layers at Base Year Cost Inventory Layers Converted to Cost

17. Example 10 Mercury Company has only one inventory pool. On December 31, 2011, Mercury adopted the dollar-value LIFO inventory method. The inventory on that date using the dollar-value LIFO method was $200,000. Inventory data are as follows: Ending Inventory at Ending Inventory at Year Year-End Costs Base Year Costs 2012 $231,000 $220,000 2013 299,000 260,000 2014 300,000 250,000 Compute the inventory at December 31, 2012, 2013, and 2014, using the dollar-value LIFO method.

18. Example 10: Continued 2012 Calculation of Cost Index Inventory Layers Converted to Cost

19. Example 10: Continued 2013 Calculation of Cost Index Inventory Layers Converted to Cost

20. Example 10 Mercury Company has only one inventory pool. On December 31, 2011, Mercury adopted the dollar-value LIFO inventory method. The inventory on that date using the dollar-value LIFO method was $200,000. Inventory data are as follows: Ending Inventory at Ending Inventory at Year Year-End Costs Base Year Costs 2012 $231,000 $220,000 2013 299,000 260,000 2014 300,000 250,000 Compute the inventory at December 31, 2012, 2013, and 2014, using the dollar-value LIFO method.

21. Example 10: Continued 2014 Calculation of Cost Index Inventory Layers Converted to Cost

22. E9-12 Astaire Company uses the gross profit method to estimate inventory for monthly reporting purposes. Presented below is information for the month of May. Inventory, May 1 $ 160,000 Purchases (gross) 640,000 Freight-in30,000 Sales1,000,000 Sales returns 70,000 Purchase discounts 12,000 • Compute the estimated inventory at May 31, assuming that the gross profit is 25% of sales. • Compute the estimated inventory at May 31, assuming that the gross profit is 25% of cost.

23. E9-12(a) Inventory, May 1 $ 160,000 Purchases (gross) 640,000 Freight-in30,000 Sales1,000,000 Sales returns 70,000 Purchase discounts 12,000 • Compute the estimated inventory at May 31, assuming that the gross profit is 25% of sales.

24. E9-12(b) • Compute the estimated inventory at May 31, assuming that the gross profit is 25% of cost. Not the easiest to use since we don’t know cost! GP = COGS * 25% and Sales – COGS = GP GP = (Sales – GP) * 25% GP = Sales * 25% – GP *25% GP + GP * 25% = Sales * 25% GP * 125% = Sales * 25% GP = Sales * 25% / 125% GP = Sales * 20%

25. E9-12(b) Inventory, May 1 $ 160,000 Purchases (gross) 640,000 Freight-in30,000 Sales1,000,000 Sales returns 70,000 Purchase discounts 12,000 • Compute the estimated inventory at May 31, assuming that the gross profit is 25% of cost (i.e., 20% of sales).

26. E9-24(a) You assemble the following information for Dillon Department Store, which computes its inventory under the dollar-value LIFO method. Cost Retail Inventory on January 1, 2012 $222,000 $300,000 Purchases 364,800 480,000 Increase in price level for year 9% Compute the cost of the inventory on December 31, 2012, assuming that the inventory at retail is $294,300.

27. E9-24(b) You assemble the following information for Dillon Department Store, which computes its inventory under the dollar-value LIFO method. Cost Retail Inventory on January 1, 2012 $222,000 $300,000 Purchases 364,800 480,000 Increase in price level for year 9% Compute the cost of the inventory on December 31, 2012, assuming that the inventory at retail is $359,700.