1 / 26

Trip Distribution Lecture 9 Norman W. Garrick

Trip Distribution Lecture 9 Norman W. Garrick. 1. 3. 2. 5. 4. 8. 7. 6. Trip Generation. Socioeconomic Data Land Use Data. Input:. Output:. Trip Ends by trip purpose. Trip Generation Trip Distribution.

Download Presentation

Trip Distribution Lecture 9 Norman W. Garrick

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Trip Distribution Lecture 9 Norman W. Garrick

  2. 1 3 2 5 4 8 7 6 Trip Generation Socioeconomic Data Land Use Data Input: Output: Trip Ends by trip purpose

  3. Trip Generation Trip Distribution The question is… how do we allocate all the trips among all the potential destinations? Trip MatrixorTrip Table Zone 1

  4. Trip Distribution

  5. Trip Distribution • We link production or origin zones to attraction or destination zones • A trip matrix is produced • The cells within the trip matrix are the “trip interchanges” between zones

  6. Basic Assumptions of Trip Distribution • Number of trips decrease with COST between zones • Number of trips increase with zone “attractiveness”

  7. Methods of Trip Distribution • Growth Factor Models • Gravity Model

  8. Growth Factor Models • Growth Factor Models assume that we already have a basic trip matrix • Usually obtained from a previous study or recent survey data

  9. Growth Factor Models • The goal is then to estimate the matrix at some point in the future • For example, what would the trip matrix look like in 2 years time? • Trip Matrix, T (2018) • Trip Matrix, t(2008)

  10. Some of the More Popular Growth Factor Models • Uniform Growth Factor • Singly-Constrained Growth Factor • Average Factor • Detroit Factor • Fratar Method

  11. Uniform Growth Factor Model

  12. Uniform Growth Factor i = I = Production Zone j = J = Attraction Zone Tij = τ tij for each pair i and j Tij =Future Trip Matrix tij = Base-year Trip Matrix τ = General Growth Rate

  13. Uniform Growth Factor If we assume τ = 1.2 (growth rate), then… • Trip Matrix, t(2013) Tij = τ tij = (1.2)(5) = 6 • Trip Matrix, T (2018)

  14. Uniform Growth Factor The Uniform Growth Factor is typically used for over a 1 or 2 year horizon However, assuming that trips growat a standard uniform rate is a fundamentally flawed concept

  15. The Gravity Model

  16. The Inspiration for the Gravity Model The big idea behind the gravity model is Newton’s law of gravitation… The force of attraction between 2 bodies is directly proportional to the product of masses between the two bodies and inversely proportional to the square of the distance M1 M2 F = k r2

  17. Some of the Variables Tij = Qij = Trips Volume between i & j Fij =1/Wcij = Friction Factor Wij = Generalized Cost (including travel time, cost) c = Calibration Constant pij = Probability that trip i will be attracted to zone j kij = Socioeconomic Adjustment Factor Tij = Trips between i & j i = production zone j = attraction zone Tij = f (Pi, Aj, Cij) Cij = Generalized cost of trip from i to j

  18. The Gravity Model The bigger the friction factor, the more trips that are encouraged Pi Aj FijKij Tij =Qij = = Pipij ΣAjFijKij (Productions)(Attractions)(Friction Factor) = Sum of the (Attractions x Friction Factors) of the Zones Fij = 1 / Wcij or ln F = - c ln W

  19. To Apply the Gravity Model What we need… • Productions, {Pi} • Attractions, {Aj} • Skim Tables {Wij) • Target-Year Interzonal Impedances

  20. Gravity Model Example 8.2 • Given: • Target-year Productions, {Pi} • Relative Attractiveness of Zones, {Aj} • Skim Table, {Wij} • Calibration Factor, c = 2.0 • Socioeconomic Adjustment Factor, K = 1.0 • Find: • Trip Interchanges, {Qij}

  21. Find Trip Interchanges, {Qij} Find Denominator of Gravity Model Equation {AjFijKij} Calculate Friction Factors, {Fij} Find Probability that Trip i will be attracted to Zone j, {pij} Given… 1 F11= = 0.04 52 A2F12K12 Calibration Factorc = 2.0 Socioeconomic Adj. FactorK = 1.0 Target-Year Inter-zonal Impedances, {Wij} Given… Calculate Friction Factors, {Fij} 1 Fij = = Wcij Find AjFijKij AjFijKij=A2F12K12 (3)(0.01)(1.0) = 0.03 Find Probability that Trip from i will be attracted to Zone j, {pij} 0.03 p12 = = 0.5838 = Σ(AjFijKij) 0.0514 Find Trip Interchanges, {Qij} Q12 = P1p12 = (1500)(0.5838) = 876

  22. Find Trip Interchanges, {Qij} Find Denominator of Gravity Model Equation {AjFijKij} Calculate Friction Factors, {Fij} Find Probability that Trip i will be attracted to Zone j, {pij} Given… 1 F23= = 0.01 102 A3F23K23 Calibration Factorc = 2.0 Socioeconomic Adj. FactorK = 1.0 Target-Year Inter-zonal Impedances, {Wij} Given… Calculate Friction Factors, {Fij} 1 Fij = = Wcij Find AjFijKij AjFijKij=A3F23K23 (2)(0.01)(1.0) = 0.02 Find Probability that Trip from i will be attracted to Zone j, {pij} 0.02 p23 = = 0.1233 = Σ(AjFijKij) 0.1622 Find Trip Interchanges, {Qij} Q12 = P2p23 = (0)(0.1233) = 2

  23. Find Trip Interchanges, {Qij} Find Denominator of Gravity Model Equation {AjFijKij} Calculate Friction Factors, {Fij} Find Probability that Trip i will be attracted to Zone j, {pij} Given… 1 F23= = 0.01 102 A3F23K23 Calibration Factorc = 2.0 Socioeconomic Adj. FactorK = 1.0 Target-Year Inter-zonal Impedances, {Wij} Given… Calculate Friction Factors, {Fij} 1 Fij = = Wcij Find AjFijKij AjFijKij=A3F23K23 (2)(0.01)(1.0) = 0.02 Find Probability that Trip from i will be attracted to Zone j, {pij} 0.02 p23 = = 0.1233 = Σ(AjFijKij) 0.1622 Find Trip Interchanges, {Qij} Q12 = P2p23 = (0)(0.1233) = 2

  24. Keep in mind that the socioeconomic factor, K, can be a matrix of values rather than just one value

  25. The Problem with K-Factors • Although K-Factors may improve the model in the base year, they assume that these special conditions will carry over to future years and scenarios • This limits model sensitivity and undermines the model’s ability to predict future travel behavior • The need for K-factors often is a symptom of other model problems. • Additionally, the use of K-factors makes it more difficult to figure out the real problems

  26. Limitations of the Gravity Model • Too much of a reliance on K-Factors in calibration • External trips and intrazonal trips cause difficulties • The skim table impedance factors are often too simplistic to be realistic • Typically based solely upon vehicle travel times • At most, this might include tolls and parking costs • Almost always fails to take into account how things such as good transit and walkable neighborhoods affect trip distribution • No obvious connection to behavioral decision-making

More Related