1 / 16

CSEPs SPA Rejections January/February 2008 update

CSEPs SPA Rejections January/February 2008 update. Level of reporting. Rejections are reported at line level This can inflate the rejection figures: If a file is resubmitted weekly without the error being corrected, each month could contain up to five rejections for one item

shea
Download Presentation

CSEPs SPA Rejections January/February 2008 update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CSEPs SPA RejectionsJanuary/February 2008 update

  2. Level of reporting • Rejections are reported at line level • This can inflate the rejection figures: • If a file is resubmitted weekly without the error being corrected, each month could contain up to five rejections for one item • CSP01 rejections could be incurred for one project but multiple shippers, further increasing the reported figures

  3. CSEPs SPA rejections – January 2008

  4. CSEPs SPA rejections – February 2008

  5. CSP01 – CSEP does not exist • Resolution: xoserve manually process rejections to enable resubmitted updates to accept • Current position: increases in January due to 480 brand new projects

  6. CSP01 – project level • Number of projects received each month resulting in CSP01s:

  7. Impact of CSP01 • Estimate of January CSP01 impacts: • 36,375 supply points (of which 36,248 are domestic) • 714 M kWh of AQ (555 M kWh domestic)

  8. CSP01 rejections – Jan08 analysis • Not investigated – ring-fenced with IGTs 352 • Not investigated – awaiting ref info 303 • Still investigating 427 • Investigated 1,063 • Total 2,145

  9. CSP01 rejections – Jan08 analysis • 1,063 investigated • Successful: 515 • Unsuccessful: 548 • Total 1,063

  10. CSP01 rejections – Jan08 analysis • 548 Unsuccessful - reasons • Quoted 42 • Accepted 176 • Cancelled 49 • Nest 7 • Not found 255 • With DN 4 • Other 15 • Total 548

  11. AQ04 – Max CSEP AQ exceeded • Resolution: IGTs examine whether updates/AQs are valid • Current position: low volumes attributed to system issue; validation corrected October hence increase to previous levels

  12. AQ04 – project level

  13. LMP01 – EUC incorrect for LMN • Resolution: IGTs should send updates using the EUC held by xoserve • Current position: large increase May, peak in June, some reduction since

  14. LMP03 – LMN is not live • Resolution: IGTs should not send updates for non live LMNs • Current position: large increase in January

  15. AQ03 – No change to supply point count or AQ • Resolution: IGTs should not send updates that do not change SPA data • Large peak in October (AQ review?), great improvement in November, maintained – not a current issue

  16. LMP06 – A live or pending meter is present • Resolution: IGTs should not submit new domestic sites where an LMN already exists for project/shipper combination • Current position: volumes variable; reduced to normal levels Feb

More Related