1 / 9

Florida SUS Board of Governors Campus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup

Florida SUS Board of Governors Campus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”.

sheba
Download Presentation

Florida SUS Board of Governors Campus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Florida SUS Board of GovernorsCampus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University ofCentralFlorida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”

  2. Florida SUS Board of GovernorsCampus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup • 2007 Campus Master Plan Lessons Learned Report • Key Recommendation to update BOG Regulation • 6C-21 using a collaboration approach • Include SUS and university, local government, state • government, civic perspectives • Conduct as an open, inclusive and transparent process Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”

  3. Florida SUS Board of GovernorsCampus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup Chair • Steve Pfeiffer,NCF, General Counsel • LocalGovernment Perspectives • BobFriedman. Councilor. Town of Jupiter • Christopher Testerman,OrangeCounty • Fred Goodrow, City of Tallahassee • Vincent Long, Florida Association Counties, • Leon County • Board of Governors Perspective • Ken Ogletree,BOGArchitect • Community Perspectives • CharlesPattison,1000FriendsofFlorida • University Legal and Facilities Planning Perspectives • David Kian, FAU,Legal • Scott Cole, UCF, Legal • Barbara Donerly, USF, Facilities Planning • MarkBartolami,FSU, Facilities Planning • LindaDixon,UF, Facilities Planning • TomDonaudy,FAU, Facilities Planning • State and Other Perspectives • Charles Gauthier, DCA, Planning • Linda Shelley, Fowler Long, Tallahassee

  4. Florida SUS Board of GovernorsCampus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup Workplan May, 2008- Spring, 2009 • ESTABLISH A CAMPUS MASTER PLAN REGULATION DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP (JAN-APRIL, 2008) • CONVENE THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN REGULATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS (MAY-JULY, 2008) (2 MEETINGS) • Phase 1- Organizational Scoping of Issues, Education and Initial Findings and Drafting • BUILDING CONSENSUS ON THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN (SEPT. 08- MAR. 09)(5 MEETINGS) • Phase 2- Regulation Development and Drafting (September-December, 2008, 3 meetings) • Phase 3- Consensus Building on Regulation (January, 09- March 09, 2 meetings) • FINALIZE WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS AND STAFF • Presentation of Workgroup Recommendations to the BOG (Spring, 2009). • Promulgation of BOG regulation(Summer, 2009)

  5. Overview of the Campus Master Plan 2007 Lessons Learned Report & Recommendations • BOG should undertake a collaborative rule development process. • BOG, SUS Campuses and local governments should establish a • recurring source of funding for the SUS Concurrency Trust fund. • SUS Campuses and FAC/FLC should work together to improve • and provide greater consistency for a system that defines and • tracks improvements in the “context” areas. • SUS Campuses and host local governments should sponsor joint • planning processes for nearby off-campus improvements. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”

  6. Florida SUS Board of GovernorsCampus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Key Campus Master Plan Issue Areas ( from Workgroup Member Pre-Process Survey) • Connecting Campus Master Plans and Local Comprehensive Plans • Connecting Campus Master Plans to DOE Requirements • Structure of the CMP • Construction Funding and Infrastructure Requirements • Streamlining the CMP Adoption Process • Enhancing the Planning Relationship and Quality of the Plans • Addressing Regional and Branch Campuses • Timing, Scope of Input and Role of the BOG in the CMP process Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”

  7. Florida SUS Board of GovernorsCampus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Key Campus Development Agreement Issue Areas ( from Workgroup Member Pre-Process Survey) • Cost and Length of the CDA Process • Concurrency Funding • Concurrency Payments for Improvements • Accountability for Improvements • Other Infrastructure Funding Opportunities • Measuring Mitigation and Impacts • Managing Projects that May Be Inconsistent with the CMP of CDA • Independent Reviews • Public Engagement Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”

  8. Florida SUS Board of GovernorsCampus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Key ”Working Relationships” Issue Areas ( from Workgroup Member Pre-Process Survey) • Among all • SUS Campuses and BOG • SUS Campuses and Local Governments • SUS Campuses and Communities Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”

  9. Campus Master Plan 6C-21 Regulation Workgroup Questions?

More Related