10 likes | 50 Views
This study evaluates the validity of Computerized Oculomotor Vision Screening (COVS) in measuring negative fusional vergence (NFV) recovery in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and non-mTBI subjects. Scatter plots and Bland-Altman plots are used to compare NFV recovery measures for both groups. The effectiveness of COVS in a military population is discussed in a pilot study.
E N D
Figure 6. Computerized oculomotor vision screening (COVS) validity for measuring negative fusional vergence (NFV) recovery. (a) NFV recovery measures of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) () and non-mTBI (×) subjects are presented on scatter plot showing regression line for both groups combined (fine solid line), mTBI group (fine dashed lines), and non-mTBI group (fine dotted line). (b) Bland-Altman plot shows horizontal lines at mean difference (bold dotted line); upper and lower 95 percent limits of agreement (LOAs) (bold dashed lines); and regression line for both groups combined (fine solid line), mTBI group (fine dashed lines), and non-mTBI group (fine dotted line). Area right of vertical dashed line indicates expected normative value range. PD = prism diopter. Capó-Aponte JE, Tarbett AK, Urosevich TG, Temme LA, Sanghera NK, Kalich ME. Effectiveness of computerized oculomotor vision screening in a military population: Pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(9):1377–98.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0128