1 / 11

Review Lifecourse Framework Review Sampson and Laub Moffitt’s Theory

Review Lifecourse Framework Review Sampson and Laub Moffitt’s Theory. Lifecourse Theory I. Must explain why there is stability in criminal behavior Must explain childhood precursors to offending (antisocial behavior) Must explain desistence, or “change”. Lifecourse Theory II.

shel
Download Presentation

Review Lifecourse Framework Review Sampson and Laub Moffitt’s Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review Lifecourse FrameworkReview Sampson and LaubMoffitt’s Theory

  2. Lifecourse Theory I • Must explain why there is stability in criminal behavior • Must explain childhood precursors to offending (antisocial behavior) • Must explain desistence, or “change”

  3. Lifecourse Theory II • Types of Lifecourse Theories (From Cullen and Agnew) • Stability Theories (Trait) • Stability and Change Theories (Sampson and Laub) • Stability or Change Theories (Moffitt)

  4. Sampson and Laub Childhood Adolescence Adulthood • Parenting • Supervision • Discipline • Social Bonds • Family • School • Delinquent Peers Context Delinquency Adult Crime Individual Differences Length of Incarceration • Social Bonds • Marriage • Good Job

  5. Terrie Moffitt • A Stability or Change Theory • Argument: • There are 2 different “kinds” of offenders in the world • These types can be characterized by their unique “offending trajectories” • Failure of Mainstream Criminology? • During adolescence, these two groups look rather similar

  6. Moffitt’s 2 Groups of Offenders • LCP’s • Early Start, Stable over lifecourse, 5% of general population (small group) • Therefore… • Why start so early? Why so stable? • AL’s • Late starters, desist in adulthood, very prevalent in population • Therefore…. • Why start so late? Why desist right away?

  7. Explaining the LCP trajectory • Presence of “Neuropsychological Deficits” • Where do they come from? • Why do they matter? INTERACTING WITH • Ineffective Parenting • Monitoring, supervision, etc. • This “dual hazard” puts them on bad path…however…

  8. Cumulative Continuity for LCP’s • What in the environment is affected? • Peer Rejection • School Failure • Parenting

  9. Explaining the AL’s • Maturity Gap • Knifing off Bonds as “rewarding” • Mimic • Why do AL’s desist? • However, some may exhibit continuity • “Snares” as another example of cumulative continuity

  10. Patterson II: Gerry Returs • We’ve covered his “early starter” theory already. • Late Starters? • Family Disruption affects parental efficacy • Lack of Supervision exposes kids to delinquent peers

  11. Key Moffitt Questions • Why do we need 2 theories? • How does she account for stability and change? • Specific explanations of LCP and AL offending

More Related