1 / 13

Kyoto, dyr og dårlig Mere Kyoto efter 2012?

Kyoto, dyr og dårlig Mere Kyoto efter 2012?. Pris og effekt. Pris for Kyoto: Forløbig omkring 60 mia $. Effekt: afvigelse fra udviklingen uden intervention ca. 0,1 C - omkring år 2025. http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Kyoto_Count_Up.htm. Varmt eller koldt?.

shelby
Download Presentation

Kyoto, dyr og dårlig Mere Kyoto efter 2012?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kyoto, dyr og dårligMere Kyoto efter 2012?

  2. Pris og effekt • Pris for Kyoto: Forløbig omkring 60 mia $. Effekt: afvigelse fra udviklingen uden intervention ca. 0,1 C - omkring år 2025. http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Kyoto_Count_Up.htm .

  3. Varmt eller koldt? • http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm

  4. Ingen ”global” opvarming i USA Annual mean surface temperatures in the contiguous United States between 1895 and 1997 http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm(Jf. også disskussion om sammenhæng mellem CO2 og Temperatur)

  5. CO2=Food for plants • ”As atmospheric CO2 increases, plant growth rates increase. Also, leaves lose less water as CO2 increases, so that plants are able to grow under drier conditions. Animal life, which depends upon plant life for food, increases proportionally. ”http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm

  6. En klar sammenhæng? Frygt for ny istid i perioden 1940-1970 - som følge af global nedkøling

  7. http://www.ipa.org.au/files/Review55-1%20The%20past%20is%20the%20key%20to%20the%20present.pdfhttp://www.ipa.org.au/files/Review55-1%20The%20past%20is%20the%20key%20to%20the%20present.pdf

  8. Pris og effekt? http://www.climatechangeissues.com/files/science/defreitas.pdf

  9. Prisen værd? The effect on global temperature rise of cuts in greenhouse gas emissions proposed by the “Old” Kyoto Protocol drafted in 1997 and the “New” Kyoto agreement drafted in July 2001.http://www.climatechangeissues.com/files/science/defreitas.pdf

  10. http://www.ipa.org.au/files/Review55-1%20The%20past%20is%20the%20key%20to%20the%20present.pdfhttp://www.ipa.org.au/files/Review55-1%20The%20past%20is%20the%20key%20to%20the%20present.pdf

  11. Icehouse or hothouse? “During the last 2 billion years the Earth's climate has alternated between a frigid "Ice House", like today's world, and a steaming "Hot House", like the world of the dinosaurs.” http://www.scotese.com/climate.htm

  12. Hothouse or icehouse? http://www.scotese.com/climate.htm

  13. En klar sammenhæng mellem Co2 og gennemsnits-temperaturen? http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/historical_CO2.htm

More Related