1 / 18

Forest Rights Act, 2006: Beyond Rhetoric & Political Correctness

Explore the Forest Rights Act of 2006, delving into the movement beyond rhetoric and political correctness. Dive into the evolution, implementation, and challenges of this significant legislation.

shelbym
Download Presentation

Forest Rights Act, 2006: Beyond Rhetoric & Political Correctness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FOREST RIGHTS ACT, 2006: MOVEMENT BEYOND RHETORIC & POLITICAL CORRECTNESS? Dr. M.K.RAMESH Professor NLSIU

  2. I . PERCEPTIONS ABOUT FORESTS • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: MEETINGINDUSTRIAL DEMANDS – MINERAL EXTRACTION - MEGA PROJECTS – BIO-PROSPECTING AND IP • ECOLOGICAL : CONSERVATION - MAINTENANCE OF BALANCE • HUMAN RIGHT : SUSTENANCE & SURVIVAL – LIVELIHOOD – SHELTER • LEGAL : PRE- BRITISH ERA # SEAT OF LEARNING AND ABODE OF OUTLAWS ! # CPR # ROLE OF STATE

  3. COLONIAL ERA & POST-COLONIAL PERIOD (- up to 2005) # PRIMARILY STATE PROPERTY- EMINENT DOMAIN- USE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE- WESTERN NOTIONS OF FOREST MMT. IMBIBED – “PUBLIC TRUST” , A JUDICIAL CONSTRUCT # SCOPE FOR APPROPRIATION OF PRIVATE FORESTS BY STATE # INDIVIDUAL AND COMMUNITY RIGHTS , CONTROL AND MMT.(-CUSTOMARY) – “INTERSTS” AND “ PRIVILEGES”- EXERCISABLE AT THE DISCRTION OF STATE AGENCIES (- A FEW EXCEPTIONS IN CERTAIN STATES : “ VAN PANCHAYATS” ) –JFM & CFM # USE OF FOREST FOR NON-FOREST PUPOSE – CENTRAL APPROVAL

  4. #“RIGHT” JURISPRUDENCE: -LIMITED ACCESS, USE AND MMT. –DISCRETION OF STATE - CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST AND WILDLIFE AREAS, A MAJOR LIMITING FACTOR - CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION NOT ALIGNED TO LEGISLATIVE EVOLUTION CONCERNING NATURAL RESOURCES AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICES (- PROTECTIVE DISCRIMINATION, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, SCHEDULED AREAS, DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE ) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PESA,1996

  5. II.THE ACT • 1. OBJECTS: -TO RIGHT HISTORICAL INJUSTICE ; - TO ADDRESS THE LONG STANDING INSECURITY OF TENURIAL AND ACCESS RIGHTS AND TO INSULATE FROM FORCED DISPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM STATE DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS; - TO RECOGNIZE AND VEST FOREST RIGHTS, INCLUDING OCCUPATION, IN FOREST DWELLING SCHEDULED TRIBES AND OTHER

  6. TRADITIONAL FOREST DWELLERS (- FOR 3 GENERATIONS)*; - TO PROVIDE A FRAMEWORK FOR RECORDING FOREST RIGHTS - TO RECOGNIZE THEM AS INTEGRAL TO THE VERY SURVIVAL AND SUSTAINABILITY OF FOREST ECO-SYSTEM

  7. 2. RIGHTS : • (A). CATALOGUE OF RIGHTS: (i) RESIDENCE- INCLUDING COMMUNITY TENURES OF HABITAT & HABITATION OF PRIMITIVE TRIBAL GROUPS AND PRE-AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITIES. (ii) CULTIVATION- (INDIVIDUAL & COMMUNITY) -FOR LIVELIHOOD (- INCLUDING CUSTOMARY RIGHTS LIKE “NISTAR”) (iii) OWNERSHIP – TRADITIONAL RIGHTS-OVER MFP (NTFP)- COLLECTION, USE, DISPOSAL; FISHING; GRAZING; PROTECTION, REGENERATION, CONSERVATION OR MMT. OF ANY COMMUNITY FOREST RESOURCE-TRADITIONAL RTS. OF HUNTING/ TRAPPING , EXCLUDED

  8. (iv) CONVERSION (-PATTAS/ LEASES/ GRANTS) TO TITLES • (v) RIGHT OF SETTLEMENT AND CONVERSION OF FOREST VILLAGES INTO REVENUE VILLAGES • (vi) CONTINUATION OF STATUTORILY RECOGNIZED CUSTOMARY/ TRADITIONAL RIGHTS • (vii) ACCESS TO BD & COMMUNITY RIGHT TO IP & TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE RELATED BIO- & CULTURAL DIVERSITY

  9. (viii) insitu rehabilitation including right to alternative land when illegally evicted • (B)RIGHT TO BASIC CIVIC AMENITIES: C.G SHALL PROVIDE FOR LIMITED DIVERSION OF FOREST LAND ( -UPON RECOMMENDATION OF GRAMA SABHA) TO MAKE PROVISION FOR SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS, ROADS, TANKS ETC.

  10. (C) NATURE, EXTENT & LIMITS : (i) .HERITABLE BUT INALIENABLE (ii).DISPLACEMENT ONLY AFTER ENSURING TOTAL REHABILITATION (iii). CAP OF 4 HECTARES FOR ACTUAL AREA OF OCCUPATION / CULTIVATION (iv) EACH RIGHT COUPLED WITH A DUTY TO PROTECT WILDLIFE, CATCHMENT AREAS OF WATER SOURCES, CULTURAL & NATURAL HERITAGES

  11. 3.CRITICAL WILDLIFE HABITAT • S.2 (b) • S.4 (2)

  12. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE ARCHITECTURE & PROCESS: • G.S:- TO INITIATE THE PROCESS- PASS RESOLUTION-PETITION AGAINST ITS RESOLUTION WOULD LIE WITH S.D.L.C, WHOSE DECISION CAN BE CHALLENGED BEFORE D.L.C • S.D.LC:- EXAMINE G.S RESOLUTIONS AND PREPARE A RECORD OF RIGHTS • D.L.C :- DECIDE ON RECORD OF RIGHTS-FINAL & BINDING

  13. S.L.M.C:- MONITORS THE PROCESS OF RECOGNITION AND VESTING OF RIGHTS • 4. EFFECT :- (a) s.4 (c)- OVER RIDING EFFECT (b) s.13 - PROVISIONS IN ADDITION TO AND NOT IN DEROGATION OF PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER LAW IN FORCE

  14. 5. RULES: REQUIRE PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL • RULES, 2008 w.e.f. 1.1.08 • 6.STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION

  15. III.UNFOLDING DRAMA OF THE ABSURD ! 2004-2006 • TURF WAR BETWEEN MoEF & MINISTRY OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS • DISAPPEARANCE OF TIGERS FROM SARISKA- TIGER TASK FORCE- REPORT • MEDIA GLARE: BIG FIGHT! • PRESSURE GROUP (-PROMINENT YOUNG MPs) PETITIONING PM TO STALL THE PASSAGE OF THE BILL

  16. T.N.GODAVERMAN CASE: -CEC-FOREST COMMISSION- MoEF DIRECTIVE FOR DISCONTINUATION OF EVICTION OF TRIBALS FROM FORESTS • HUMAN RIGHT GROUPS & POLITICAL PARTIES – ARGUMENT FOR “ INCLUSION OF GROUPS” – TO PREVENT “ SOCIAL DIVISION”! • LONG GESTATION PERIOD OF THE LAW

  17. IV. OUTSTANDING PROBLEMS • INCOMPATIBILITY AMONG DIFFERENT LAWS- LACK OF HARMONY • MULTIPLICITY OF AUTHORITIES • PROBLEM OF CHARACTERIZATION OF RIGHTS AND PROBLEM OF INCLUSION & EXCLUSION • GRAMA SABHA-MARGINALISED ROLE • CRITICAL WILDLIFE HABITATS

More Related