1 / 51

Cattle Ranching, Land Use And Deforestation:

Cattle Ranching, Land Use And Deforestation:. Comparative Analysis of Brazil, Ecuador and Peru. Why ranching is important. Why ranching is important. Land clearing for pastures is a main cause of deforestation. Why ranching is important.

sherlock_clovis
Download Presentation

Cattle Ranching, Land Use And Deforestation:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cattle Ranching, Land Use And Deforestation: Comparative Analysis of Brazil, Ecuador and Peru

  2. Why ranching is important

  3. Why ranching is important • Land clearing for pastures is a main cause of deforestation

  4. Why ranching is important • Land clearing for pastures is a main cause of deforestation • Poor management main cause of the expansion of pastures (further deforestation)

  5. Why ranching is important • Land clearing for pastures is a main cause of deforestation • Poor management main cause of the expansion of pastures (further deforestation) • “Pecuarizacao” in Brazil

  6. Why ranching is important • Land clearing for pastures is a main cause of deforestation • Poor management main cause of the expansion of pastures (further deforestation) • “Pecuarizacao” in Brazil • Not observed in Peru and Ecuador

  7. Why ranching is important • Land clearing for pastures is a main cause of deforestation • Poor management main cause of the expansion of pastures (further deforestation) • “Pecuarizacao” in Brazil • Not observed in Peru and Ecuador • Promise of comparative study

  8. Conceptual Framework

  9. Cattle

  10. Yes Cattle No

  11. Yes Pasture Cattle No

  12. Yes Yes Pasture Mgt No Cattle No

  13. Yes Yes Pasture Mgt No Cattle Def. No

  14. Yes Yes Pasture Mgt No Cattle Def. No Other Activities

  15. Decision 1 Decision 1 Decision 1 Yes Yes Pasture Mgt No Cattle Def. No Other Activities

  16. Decision 1 Decision 1 Decision 1 Yes Yes Pasture Mgt Family subsist. market Firms No Cattle Def. No Other Activities

  17. Local/Regional Context Decision 1 Decision 1 Decision 1 Yes Yes Pasture Mgt Family subsist. market Firms No Cattle Def. No Other Activities

  18. National Context Local/Regional Context Decision 1 Decision 1 Decision 1 Yes Yes Pasture Mgt Family subsist. market Firms No Cattle Def. No Other Activities

  19. Global Context National Context Local/Regional Context Decision 1 Decision 1 Decision 1 Yes Yes Pasture Mgt Family subsist. market Firms No Cattle Def. No Other Activities

  20. Global Context National Context Local/Regional Context Decision 1 Decision 1 Decision 1 Scale Yes Yes Pasture Mgt Family subsist. market Firms No Cattle Def. No Other Activities

  21. Marketing Chains

  22. Marketing Chains • Defined

  23. Producer Consumer

  24. Producer Consumer

  25. Marketing Chains • Defined

  26. Marketing Chains • Defined • Why important?

  27. Marketing Chains • Defined • Why important? • Buyers set the price

  28. Marketing Chains • Defined • Why important? • Buyers set the price • Buyers set the terms (quality, quantity, frequency)

  29. Marketing Chains • Defined • Why important? • Buyers set the price • Buyers set the terms (quality, quantity, frequency) • Price & terms influence 3 critical decisions

  30. Marketing Chains • Defined • Why important? • Buyers set the price • Buyers set the terms (quality, quantity, frequency) • Price & terms influence 3 critical decisions • Altering the marketing chain can alter rate of deforestation

  31. Opportunities Constraints Costs Benefits

  32. Producer Consumer Marketing Chain

  33. Global Context National Context Local/Regional Context Producer Consumer Marketing Chain

  34. Significant Variants

  35. Significant Variants • In the relative power of different actors

  36. Producer Consumer Producer Consumer Marketing Chain

  37. Producer Consumer Producer Consumer Producer Consumer Marketing Chain

  38. Significant Variants • In the relative power of different actors

  39. Significant Variants • In the relative power of different actors • Presence of multiple marketing chains

  40. Consumer Producer Consumer

  41. Significant Variants • In the relative power of different actors • Presence of multiple marketing chains • Networks between links in multiple chains

  42. Consumer Producer Consumer

  43. Summary • Comparative analysis: Brazil, Peru, Ecuador

  44. Summary • Comparative analysis: Brazil, Peru, Ecuador • Factors that promote:

  45. Summary • Comparative analysis: Brazil, Peru, Ecuador • Factors that promote: • investment in cattle (decision 1)

  46. Summary • Comparative analysis: Brazil, Peru, Ecuador • Factors that promote: • investment in cattle (decision 1) • pasture management (decision 2)

  47. Summary • Comparative analysis: Brazil, Peru, Ecuador • Factors that promote: • investment in cattle (decision 1) • pasture management (decision 2) • deforestation (decision 3)

  48. Summary • Comparative analysis: Brazil, Peru, Ecuador • Factors that promote: • investment in cattle (decision 1) • pasture management (decision 2) • deforestation (decision 3) • Influence of marketing chains

  49. Summary • Comparative analysis: Brazil, Peru, Ecuador • Factors that promote: • investment in cattle (decision 1) • pasture management (decision 2) • deforestation (decision 3) • Influence of marketing chains • Targeting public policy to mutable points

More Related