140 likes | 297 Views
TPS Methods Report. Goals. 1) Meet Boundary Condition 477.95 O K 2) Minimize TPS Mass. Convection hA(T inf – T Wall ) (Type 3) C h A(i r -i wall ) (Type 1). Time Dependant Heat Flux a w Aq rad. Reradiation e w A(T 4 wall – T 4 rad ). TPS Material #1. X. TPS Material #2.
E N D
Goals • 1) Meet Boundary Condition • 477.95O K • 2) Minimize TPS Mass
Convection hA(Tinf – TWall) (Type 3) ChA(ir-iwall) (Type 1) Time Dependant Heat Flux awAqrad Reradiation ewA(T4wall – T4rad) TPS Material #1 X TPS Material #2 TPS Material #j Heat Conduction Problem
MATLAB & SODDIT number_of_materials = 3; materials(1) = struct('name','SLA-561V.m', 'thickness',.04,'nodes',15,'ablator',1,'mult',1); materials(2) = struct('name','AETB.m', 'thickness',.01,'nodes',15,'ablator',0,'mult',1); materials(3) = struct('name','Graphite.m', 'thickness',.01,'nodes',15,'ablator',0,'mult',0);
SODDIT & MATLAB Material Data Sweep of scale .qw file Soddit_between.m Soddit_control.m Material Data Single value of scale .qw file Mysoddit.m SODDIT _plt.txt .inp File Get_plt_data.m Temp History Thickness History Maximum Time
Teflon SLA-561V AETB Graphite-Epoxy Code Validation TPS 1 TPS 2 5cm 2cm 1cm
SLA-561V AETB 5cm Graphite-Epoxy 2cm 1cm Test Case • Completed 600s Mission Duration • Inner Wall Temp meets 477.95O K Boundary Condition
TPS Minimization Scale = -.42
SLA-561V AETB 2.32 cm Graphite-Epoxy .58 cm 1 cm Weight Savings Original Density 37.83 kg/m2 Minimized Density 29.2 kg/m2 23% Savings over Reference!!!