390 likes | 523 Views
ANTITRUST. Music: Claude DeBussy Prelude: Afternoon of a Faun (1894) Nocturnes (1900) La Mer (The Sea) (1905) Performed by Orchestre de la Suisse Romande, Conductor: Armin Jordan (1991). Possible Goals. Balance Allocative & Productive Efficiency Protect Small Businesses
E N D
ANTITRUST • Music: Claude DeBussy • Prelude: Afternoon of a Faun (1894) • Nocturnes (1900) • La Mer (The Sea) (1905) • Performed by Orchestre de la Suisse Romande, Conductor: Armin Jordan (1991)
Possible Goals • Balance Allocative & Productive Efficiency • Protect Small Businesses • Concern re Survival: “Right” to Profit • Concern re Concentrated Political Power • Distributive Justice: Prevent Overcharges to Consumers • Business Ethics: Outlaw Offensive Commercial Practices
Antitrust Revolution • 4th Edition: Contains Thirteen Case Studies I Have Assigned in Prior Years • 5th Edition: Only Has Six of These
SCOPE & ENFORCEMENT • The Reach of the Antitrust Laws • Public Enforcement • Private Enforcement • Relation Between Procedure & Substance • Conduct of Large Private Civil Lawsuit
Conduct of Large Private Civil Lawsuits • Primary Focus: Settlement • Secondary Focus: Summary Judgment
Order of Proceedings • Preliminary Negotiations • Complaint • Motion to Dismiss Part or All • Investigation & Discovery • Summary Judgment Motions • Trial Prep/Negotiations
Investigation & Discovery: Interactive Process • Legal Research Set of Relevant Facts to Investigate • Discovery of Facts More DetailedLegal Qs to Research • Theories Change as Get More Info
Investigation & Discovery: Goals • Defendant • Limit Info Going to Plaintiff • Identify D Theory of Case (& Support) • Identify Evidence Key to P Theory of Case • Plaintiff: Find Evidence Sufficient to Survive Summary Judgment • Evidence Consistent w P Theory • Evidence Inconsistent w D Theory
Investigation & Discovery: Finding Evidence • Witness Interviews • Early Interrogatories • Contentions • I.D. Witnesses & Documents • Document Review (Most Important) • Depositions • Later Interrogatories: What Evidence Supports Claims
Order of Proceedings • Preliminary Negotiations • Complaint • Motion to Dismiss Part or All • Investigation & Discovery • Summary Judgment Motions • Trial Prep/Negotiations
THEMES OF THIS COURSE • Power of Attorneys & Legal Academics to Change the Law
HISTORICAL TRENDS • 1945-75: Anti-Big Business Ideology • 1975-92: “Antitrust Revolution” • 1992-2000: Line-Drawing and Some Counter-Revolution • 2001 : ???
ASSUMPTIONS OF CLASSICAL ECONOMICS • PEOPLE ACT RATIONALLY TO MAXIMIZE THEIR OWN INTERESTS
ASSUMPTIONS OF CLASSICAL ECONOMICS • PEOPLE ACT RATIONALLY TO MAXIMIZE THEIR OWN INTERESTS • RESOURCES MOVE TO MOST VALUABLE USE IF VOLUNTARY EXCHANGE PERMITTED
“VALUE” MEASURED BY AGGREGATE CONSUMER WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR THINGS
“EFFICIENCY” EXPLOITING ECONOMIC RESOURCES TO MAXIMIZE “VALUE”
Given these definitions … • Voluntary transactions are “efficient”
Given these definitions … • Voluntary transactions are “efficient” • Free market is “efficient” • allows sequences of transactions • resources end up w those who most value them
Given these definitions … • Voluntary transactions are “efficient” • Free market is “efficient” • allows sequences of transactions • resources end up w those who most value them • Interference with market by government or cartel is “inefficient”
PROBLEMS WITH ASSUMPTIONS • DEFINITION OF “VALUE” • PEOPLE OFTEN IRRATIONAL
PROBLEMS WITH ASSUMPTIONS • DEFINITION OF “VALUE” • CONSUMER CULTURE • DEPENDS ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION • MORE $ = MORE VOTES
PROBLEMS WITH ASSUMPTIONS • PEOPLE OFTEN IRRATIONAL • OFTEN APPEAR TO ACT AGAINST SELF-INTEREST • OFTEN PERCEIVE SELVES ACTING AGAINST SELF-INTEREST
PROBLEMS WITH ASSUMPTIONS • Raise Qs About Normative Use of Theory • Claims that results of comp. market always desirable • Claims that interference w comp. market always bad
PROBLEMS WITH ASSUMPTIONS • Raise Qs About Normative Use of Theory • Theory Often Describes World Pretty Well
PROBLEMS WITH ASSUMPTIONS • Raise Qs About Normative Use of Theory • Theory Often Describes World Pretty Well • ME: Works Best if Addressing Basic Consumer Items
DEMAND CURVE: GENERALLY BUY MORE OF GOOD THE LESS IT COSTS
DEMAND CURVE:GENERALLY BUY MORE OF GOOD THE LESS IT COSTS: • SUBSTITUTION EFFECT • INCOME EFFECT
DEMAND CURVE:GENERALLY BUY MORE OF GOOD THE LESS IT COSTS • SUBSTITUTION EFFECT: AS GOOD BECOMES CHEAPER, BUY IT INSTEAD OF ALTERNATIVES • INCOME EFFECT
DEMAND CURVE:GENERALLY BUY MORE OF GOOD THE LESS IT COSTS • SUBSTITUTION EFFECT • INCOME EFFECT: AS GOOD BECOMES CHEAPER, PURCHASING POWER INCREASES, SO BUY MORE
DEMAND CURVE:GENERALLY BY MORE OF GOOD THE LESS IT COSTSEXCEPTIONS (RARE): • INFERIOR GOODS • LUXURY GOODS
DEMAND CURVE:GENERALLY BY MORE OF GOOD THE LESS IT COSTSEXCEPTIONS: • INFERIOR GOODS: GOODS YOU BUY MORE OF, THE LESS $ YOU HAVE • LUXURY GOODS
DEMAND CURVE:GENERALLY BY MORE OF GOOD THE LESS IT COSTSEXCEPTIONS: • INFERIOR GOODS • LUXURY GOODS: GOODS YOU BUY BECAUSE OF THE HIGH PRICE
FACTORS AFFECTING DEMAND • PERSONAL TASTE • INCOME • PRICE OF COMPLEMENTARY GOODS • PRICE OF SUBSTITUTES
FACTORS AFFECTING DEMAND • PERSONAL TASTE • INCOME • PRICE OF COMPLEMENTARY GOODS • PRICE OF SUBSTITUTES
FACTORS AFFECTING DEMAND • PERSONAL TASTE • INCOME • PRICE OF COMPLEMENTARY GOODS • PRICE OF SUBSTITUTES
FACTORS AFFECTING DEMAND • PERSONAL TASTE • INCOME • PRICE OF COMPLEMENTARY GOODS • PRICE OF SUBSTITUTES